The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
A recent study funded in part by the Charles G. Koch Foundation supports existing scientific evidence that global climate change is happening and is primarily caused by humans. The study's lead author, Dr. Richard Muller, was a well-known climate skeptic who was "converted" by his own examination of global temperature data.
Charles Koch and his brother David have funneled more than $61 million to groups that deny the science and seriousness of climate change. Because of this massive effort and the contradictory investment in Dr. Muller's project, which is currently being submitted for formal peer-review, Greenpeace believes it is crucial for Charles Koch to set the record straight. Does Mr. Koch stand with the conclusions of the science he helped fund, or will he continue to finance unscientific political advocacy against global warming solutions?
I make my case to Charles Koch in the following letter:
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Paul Brown
When countries run short of food, they need to find solutions fast, and one answer can be urban farming.
By Lakshmi Magon
This year, three studies showed that humor is useful for engaging the public about climate change. The studies, published in The Journal of Science Communication, Comedy Studies and Science Communication, added to the growing wave of scientists, entertainers and politicians who agree.
By Tara Lohan
If I were to open my refrigerator, the origins of most of the food wouldn't be too much of a mystery — the milk, cheese and produce all come from relatively nearby farms. I can tell from the labels on other packaged goods if they're fair trade, non-GMO or organic.
By Mark Hertsgaard and Kyle Pope
Some good news, for a change, about climate change: When hundreds of newsrooms focus their attention on the climate crisis, all at the same time, the public conversation about the problem gets better: more prominent, more informative, more urgent.