Groups File Suit over Largest Coal Plans Ever Approved by U.S. Interior Department
Safeguarding the climate, WildEarth Guardians and the Sierra Club today filed suit against the U.S. Department of Interior over one of the largest coal mining plans ever to be approved by the federal government.
“Our clean water, the air we breathe, the safety of our communities; they all depend on reversing the impacts of global warming and restoring a safe climate,” said Jeremy Nichols, WildEarth Guardians’ Climate and Energy program director. “In spite of this, the Interior Department is signing off on more coal and more greenhouse gases than ever before. This has to stop.”
The suit challenges four new coal leases in the Powder River Basin of northeastern Wyoming, which produces 43 percent of the nation’s coal. The leases would open the door for more than two billion tons of new strip mining. Coal from the Powder River Basin is burned throughout the U.S. and is increasingly exported to Asia, spewing carbon dioxide on a global scale.
The challenged leases threaten to lead to more than 3.3 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide, which would be like cutting down more than 400 million acres of forest—an area roughly four times the size of Texas. The mining comes as atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide are greatly exceeding 350 parts per million, the level considered safe for humanity.
In 2009, Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, sounded the alarms over increases in carbon dioxide and their link to global warming, stating in 2009, “Carbon pollution is putting our world—and our way of life—in peril.”
“The Sierra Club is deeply disappointed in the Department of Interior’s decision,” said Connie Wilbert with the Wyoming Chapter of the Sierra Club. “It’s time we invest in clean, responsible energies like wind and solar. With our economy at risk and our climate in crisis doubling down on coal is simply the wrong choice. This mining site will heavily contribute to one of the worst forms of pollution in the United States. Interior should not be in the business of making kids, families and communities sicker.”
Despite Salazar’s statement, the coal leases at issue would represent one of the largest coal mining plans ever approved by the federal government. Recent reports show that the Interior Department has been downplaying, if not outright covering up, greenhouse gas emissions associated with its coal decisions.
The Powder River Basin is a root contributor to global warming in the U.S. Producing more than 460 million tons of coal annually, power plants in 35 states from Oregon to New Jersey burn coal from the region. The coal is federally owned and managed by the Bureau of Land Management, an Interior Department agency. The Bureau estimates that for every one ton of Powder River Basin coal burned, 1.659 metric tons of carbon dioxide are released. In total, the region is responsible for 13 percent of all U.S. carbon dioxide emissions, more than any other single activity.
At the same time, strip mining in the Powder River Basin is fueling regional clean air concerns. Reports by the Bureau of Land Management have found that coal mining is contributing to violations of air quality limits for particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide gases (a byproduct of blasting at coal mines).
Today’s lawsuit targets the South Hilight, North Hilight, South Porcupine and North Porcupine coal leases. These leases would allow the expansion of the world’s two largest coal mines—the Black Thunder and North Antelope Rochelle mines—which are owned by two of the world’s largest coal companies—Arch Coal (Black Thunder) and Peabody Energy (North Antelope Rochelle).
Coal leases, which last for 20 years, give companies a right to mine, which guarantees that if the Bureau of Land Management’s decisions to issue the leases are upheld, the coal will be mined.
The leases are the first of six pending leases approved by the Interior Department to expand the Black Thunder and North Antelope Rochelle mines. Called the “Wright Area” coal leases, the six leases collectively threaten to open the door for a total of 4.2 billion tons of new coal mining.
Filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., today’s lawsuit challenges the Interior Department’s failure to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act and the Federal Land Policy Management Act.
For more information, click here.
England's Somerset county can now boast its first beaver dam in more than 400 years.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Alex McInturff, Christine Wilkinson and Wenjing Xu
What is the most common form of human infrastructure in the world? It may well be the fence. Recent estimates suggest that the total length of all fencing around the globe is 10 times greater than the total length of roads. If our planet's fences were stretched end to end, they would likely bridge the distance from Earth to the Sun multiple times.
Early advertisement for barbed wire fencing, 1880-1889. The advent of barbed wire dramatically changed ranching and land use in the American West by ending the open range system. Kansas Historical Society / CC BY-ND
The authors assembled a conservative data set of potential fence lines across the U.S. West. They calculated the nearest distance to any given fence to be less than 31 miles (50 kilometers), with a mean of about 2 miles (3.1 kilometers). McInturff et al,. 2020 / CC BY-ND
- 'This Is Not Like a Fence in a Backyard' — Trump's Border Wall vs ... ›
- New Border Wall Construction Threatens 8 Species With Extinction ... ›
Climate change is making ancient Hopi farming nearly impossible, threatening not just the Tribe's staple food source, but a pillar of its culture and religion, the Arizona Republic reports.
- These Are the Challenges Facing India's Most Sacred River ... ›
- Oil Spill Causes 'Major Disaster' for Ganges River Dolphins ... ›
By Kenny Stancil
An expert panel of top international and environmental lawyers have begun working this month on a legal definition of "ecocide" with the goal of making mass ecological damage an enforceable international crime on par with war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
- Are the Amazon Fires a Crime Against Humanity? - EcoWatch ›
- 'Her Work Will Live On': Climate Movement Mourns Loss of Ecocide ... ›