Grand River Flotilla Protests Enbridge Tar Sands Spill and Pipeline Expansion
The Michigan Coalition Against Tar Sands (MI CATS) took to the water on Saturday in a flotilla to protest the Canadian corporation Enbridge at the destruction site which undercuts the Grand River. Members and friends of the MI CATS paddled the Grand River in an organized flotilla to challenge the injustice and harm caused by the 2010 expansion and spill of Enbridge’s tar sands pipeline 6B.
Protesters carried signs and chanted slogans “Kalamazoo Hates Tar Sands Too” to remind the public of the destruction caused by Enbridge’s spill in 2010—which is far from clean, more than three years later. They held the space on the water for a moment of silence in remembrance of 6B’s failure in 2010, and as a gesture towards the climate catastrophes and ecological disasters that are likely to continue as tar sands’ infrastructure is put in place.
Upon exiting the water, the protesters returned to a nearby picnic site where they were joined by members of the community, fellow activists, students and community organizations to take part in a barbecue and listen to an expert panel of speakers including, an indigenous elder, a spill victim turned activist and outdoor enthusiast Craig Ritter.
The speakers highlighted the injustices caused by the spill and the ongoing violations endured by communities surrounding the spill zone, as well as the spiritual and physical detriment the destruction of mother Earth has on us all.
Visit EcoWatch’s TAR SANDS pages for more related news on this topic.
By Robin Scher
Beyond the questions surrounding the availability, effectiveness and safety of a vaccine, the COVID-19 pandemic has led us to question where our food is coming from and whether we will have enough.
- Can Urban Farms Prevent Hunger in 54 Million People in the U.S. ... ›
- New Report Finds Malnutrition World's Top Killer Amid Pandemic ... ›
- Oxfam Warns 12,000 Could Die Per Day From Hunger Due to ... ›
- Three Ways to Support a Healthy Food System During the COVID ... ›
- Trump USDA Resumes Effort to Cut Food Stamp Benefits - EcoWatch ›
- Pandemic Threatens Food Security for Many College Students ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Tearing through the crowded streets of Philadelphia, an electric car and a gas-powered car sought to win a heated race. One that mimicked how cars are actually used. The cars had to stop at stoplights, wait for pedestrians to cross the street, and swerve in and out of the hundreds of horse-drawn buggies. That's right, horse-drawn buggies. Because this race took place in 1908. It wanted to settle once and for all which car was the superior urban vehicle. Although the gas-powered car was more powerful, the electric car was more versatile. As the cars passed over the finish line, the defeat was stunning. The 1908 Studebaker electric car won by 10 minutes. If in 1908, the electric car was clearly the better form of transportation, why don't we drive them now? Today, I'm going to answer that question by diving into the history of electric cars and what I discovered may surprise you.
As bitcoin's fortunes and prominence rise, so do concerns about its environmental impact.
- 15 Top Conservation Issues of 2021 Include Big Threats, Potential ... ›
- How Blockchain Could Boost Clean Energy - EcoWatch ›
By David Drake and Jeffrey York
The Research Brief is a short take about interesting academic work.
The Big Idea
People often point to plunging natural gas prices as the reason U.S. coal-fired power plants have been shutting down at a faster pace in recent years. However, new research shows two other forces had a much larger effect: federal regulation and a well-funded activist campaign that launched in 2011 with the goal of ending coal power.
- Major Milestone: More than 100,000 MW Worth of Coal-Fired Power ... ›
- Coal Will Not Bring Appalachia Back to Life, But Tech and ... ›
- Renewables Beat Coal in the U.S. for the First Time This April ... ›