The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
IEA: China and India to Fuel Further Rise in Global Coal Demand in 2018
By Daisy Dunne
The IEA's Coal 2018 report finds that global coal demand grew by 1 percent in 2017 after two years of decline. The rise was chiefly driven by global economic growth, it says. Despite recent growth, demand is still below "peak" levels seen in 2014.
Demand is likely to "remain stable" until 2023, the report authors say. This is because falling demand in western Europe and North America is likely to be offset by increased demand in a host of Asian countries, including India, Indonesia and Vietnam.
Carbon Brief takes a look at the IEA's changing coal forecasts for key world regions.
Each year, the IEA publishes a series of six-year forecasts for key energy markets. For example, the Coal 2018 report looks at the market for the fossil fuel out to 2023, broken down by country and sector.
This year's report leads with the news that global coal demand returned to growth in 2017 after two years of decline. It is likely that demand will continue to grow in 2018, said Keisuke Sadamori, director of energy markets and security at the IEA. He told a press briefing:
"The global coal demand declined in 2015 and 2016. In 2017, it rebounded, and our estimates suggest it will grow in 2018 too. However, this is very different to the growth we saw earlier in the decade."
In other words, global coal demand is growing, but is still below "peak" levels seen in 2014. Actual demand is shown in red on the chart below, with each year's IEA forecast shown in shades of blue. (Note that the y-axis does not start at zero.)
The further expected increase to demand in 2018 is thought to be "driven by strong coal power generation in China and India," the report says.
The chart also shows how, in 2016, global coal demand fell to a level lower than expected by the IEA's projections.
This year's six-year forecast is the first to project a small decline in global coal demand by 2021—suggesting IEA is moving away from forecasting ongoing growth in demand.
The change in forecast reflects the fact that "we are in a different world" to when the IEA made its first coal projections in 2011, said Carlos Fernández Alvarez, a senior energy analyst at the IEA. He told Carbon Brief:
"In 2011, the big question about coal was when Chinese coal consumption would peak. Given the sheer size of China and of Chinese growth, this meant that the world's coal consumption would also grow. Now, we are in a different world. Not only owing to changes in China, but many other things have happened in the meantime, such as the shale revolution, the renewable costs decline and the Paris Agreement—so our forecast has also changed."
The projected plateau and slow decline of global demand in the coming years is partly the result of efforts to move away from coal in western Europe and North America, the authors say.
The map below, which is taken from page 89 of the report, gives an idea of how coal phase-out plans currently look across Europe.
On the map, light green shows countries that have no coal power plants, dark green shows out where phase-out has been planned for 2020-30, orange shows where a phase-out has been discussed and scarlet is used for countries with no phase-out policy.
Differences in coal phase-out policy in countries across Europe. Light green shows countries that have no coal power plants, dark green shows where phase-out has been planned for 2020-30, orange shows where a phase-out has been discussed and scarlet is used for countries with no phase-out policyCoal 2018, IEA
The map paints a picture of "two Europes," the report says. In western Europe, specific policies for a coal phase out combined with action on climate change, including through the EU Emissions Trading System, is likely to hit coal demand hard, the report says:
"By 2023, at least two more countries, France and Sweden, will have closed their last coal power plants, and Germany will be the only significant coal consumer remaining in western Europe."
Across the EU, coal consumption declined by 1.1 percent to 627m tonnes in 2017. Consumption of thermal coal—which is used in power generation—dropped by a sharp 7 percent from 2016 to 188m tonnes, while coking coal—which is used in steel production—remained flat. Lignite use for power generation increased 2 percent to 381m tonnes.
However, in eastern Europe—where coal demand remains level—most countries have not announced phase-out policies, the report says, and new coal power plants are under construction in the Balkans, Greece and Poland.
The report projects that, in the EU, coal demand will drop 2.5 percent per year, from 325m tonnes of coal equivalent (mtce) in 2017 to 280 mtce in 2023. (Coal equivalent is a standardized measure of the energy obtained from burning coal.)
By this point, it will have taken 30 years for coal consumption to drop by half, the report notes, "indicating the resiliency of coal as an energy resource."
Looking across the whole of Europe, however, brings a different forecast. Coal demand is expected to fall at a rate of 1.3 percent—owing to demand remaining stable in eastern Europe and potentially increasing in Turkey, the report says.
In the U.S., coal demand dropped by 2.6 percent to 641m tonnes in 2017. However, this decline is less rapid than in the last two years, likely reflecting a slow-down in the closure of coal power stations, the report says. Coal retirements have returned to near-record levels in 2018.
In China, the world's largest coal producer, demand rose by 10m tonnes to 3,664m tonnes in 2017, following three years of decline. This rise was largely fueled by an increase in coal-fired power generation, the report says.
However, the IEA projects a decline in coal demand to 2,673 mtce by 2023. This is owed to expected declines of coal consumption by key industries, such as steel.
Another expected driver of falling demand in China is the country's "Blue Sky" policy—an action plan for cutting air pollution across large cities. The policy has seen several cities, including Beijing, introduce bans on residents burning coal for heat. The report says:
"Environmental policies, and in particular clean-air measures, constrain coal demand. The main target of the policy action is to reduce direct coal use and small boilers in residential heating, as well as in the commercial and industrial sectors. Cement, steel and small power producers are also targeted in China's air-quality campaign."
These measures, along with China's commitment to investing in renewable energy and energy efficiency, led the IEA to project an overall decline in demand in China—despite the growth seen in 2017. The report says:
"Considering all these moving pieces, we maintain the forecast in last year's report that China's coal demand has entered a slow but structural decline at less than 1% per year on average."
The world's greatest percentage increase in coal power demand (5.4 percent) is expected to occur in Southeast Asia—where demand is projected to rise from 186 mtce in 2017 to 259 mtce in 2023.
Demand growth is expected to be highest in Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines, the report says:
"Although these countries differ considerably in energy resource endowment, they share robust economic growth, a rising population and an expanding middle class, all of which boost power demand. As coal-based power is expected to cover a significant share of the additional demand … considerable new coal-fired capacity is set to come online in these four countries."
In India, demand is expected to rise from 563 mtce in 2017 to 708 mtce in 2023. The chief driver of this demand is a growing desire for coal-fired power, fueled by ongoing infrastructure development and the expansion of the country's middle class, the report says.
Coal demand in India is also expected to grow as a result of expansion in key industries, such as cement and sponge iron production. By 2023, India's non-power coal consumption is expected to rise by 33 mtce to 163 mtce.
However, demand is expected to rise more slowly than in the previous decade, the report says. This is largely down to investment in renewable sources of power, the report says.
The IEA expects the proportion of electricity from renewable sources to double to 25 percent of the total power mix by 2023. The Indian government is aiming to install 100 gigawatts (GW) of solar by 2022 and 50GW of wind—double the wind capacity of 2017 and four times the solar capacity. The report says:
"The large-scale ongoing renewable expansion and the use of supercritical technology in new coal power plants will slow coal demand growth, which will grow by less than 4% per year through 2023, compared to over 6% on average per year in the past decade."
In addition to growing more slowly than in the recent past, India's coal demand has fallen short of earlier IEA forecasts. This year, the IEA has once again cut its forecast for coal demand growth in India.
Reposted with permission from our media associate Carbon Brief.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Tracy L. Barnett
Sources reviewed this article for accuracy.
For Sicangu Lakota water protector Cheryl Angel, Standing Rock helped her define what she stands against: an economy rooted in extraction of resources and exploitation of people and planet. It wasn't until she'd had some distance that the vision of what she stands for came into focus.
Last week, the Peruvian Palm Oil Producers' Association (JUNPALMA) promised to enter into an agreement for sustainable and deforestation-free palm oil production. The promise was secured by the U.S. based National Wildlife Federation (NWF) in collaboration with the local government, growers and the independent conservation organization Sociedad Peruana de Ecodesarrollo.
The rallying cry to build it again and to build it better than before is inspiring after a natural disaster, but it may not be the best course of action, according to new research published in the journal Science.
"Faced with global warming, rising sea levels, and the climate-related extremes they intensify, the question is no longer whether some communities will retreat—moving people and assets out of harm's way—but why, where, when, and how they will retreat," the study begins.
The researchers suggest that it is time to rethink retreat, which is often seen as a last resort and a sign of weakness. Instead, it should be seen as the smart option and an opportunity to build new communities.
"We propose a reconceptualization of retreat as a suite of adaptation options that are both strategic and managed," the paper states. "Strategy integrates retreat into long-term development goals and identifies why retreat should occur and, in doing so, influences where and when."
The billions of dollars spent to rebuild the Jersey Shore and to create dunes to protect from future storms after Superstorm Sandy in 2012 may be a waste if sea level rise inundates the entire coastline.
"There's a definite rhetoric of, 'We're going to build it back better. We're going to win. We're going to beat this. Something technological is going to come and it's going to save us,'" said A.R. Siders, an assistant professor with the disaster research center at the University of Delaware and lead author of the paper, to the New York Times. "It's like, let's step back and think for a minute. You're in a fight with the ocean. You're fighting to hold the ocean in place. Maybe that's not the battle we want to pick."
Rethinking retreat could make it a strategic, efficient, and equitable way to adapt to the climate crisis, the study says.
Dr. Siders pointed out that it has happened before. She noted that in the 1970s, the small town of Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin moved itself out of the flood plain after one too many floods. The community found and reoriented the business district to take advantage of highway traffic and powered it entirely with solar energy, as the New York Times reported.
That's an important lesson now that rising sea levels pose a catastrophic risk around the world. Nearly 75 percent of the world's cities are along shorelines. In the U.S. alone coastline communities make up nearly 40 percent of the population— more than 123 million people, which is why Siders and her research team are so forthright about the urgency and the complexities of their findings, according to Harvard Magazine.
Some of those complexities include, coordinating moves across city, state or even international lines; cultural and social considerations like the importance of burial grounds or ancestral lands; reparations for losses or damage to historic practices; long-term social and psychological consequences; financial incentives that often contradict environmental imperatives; and the critical importance of managing retreat in a way that protects vulnerable and poor populations and that doesn't exacerbate past injustices, as Harvard Magazine reported.
If communities could practice strategic retreats, the study says, doing so would not only reduce the need for people to choose among bad options, but also improve their circumstances.
"It's a lot to think about," said Siders to Harvard Magazine. "And there are going to be hard choices. It will hurt—I mean, we have to get from here to some new future state, and that transition is going to be hard.…But the longer we put off making these decisions, the worse it will get, and the harder the decisions will become."
To help the transition, the paper recommends improved access to climate-hazard maps so communities can make informed choices about risk. And, the maps need to be improved and updated regularly, the paper said as the New York Times reported.
"It's not that everywhere should retreat," said Dr. Siders to the New York Times. "It's that retreat should be an option. It should be a real viable option on the table that some places will need to use."
Leaked documents show that Jair Bolsonaro's government intends to use the Brazilian president's hate speech to isolate minorities living in the Amazon region. The PowerPoint slides, which democraciaAbierta has seen, also reveal plans to implement predatory projects that could have a devastating environmental impact.