Quantcast
Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

Help Support EcoWatch

Fracking: Putting Our National Parks at Risk

Energy
Fracking: Putting Our National Parks at Risk

America’s national parks cover nearly 52 million acres—an area roughly the size of Kansas—and contain some of the most incredible natural landscapes in the country. Sweeping valleys, frosted mountain peaks and immaculate waterways host a range of incredible wildlife, many of which are threatened or endangered.

Colorado's White River National Forest is among the 200 million acres of public land being targeted by oil and gas executives for fracking. Photo credit: Bryce R. Bradford / Creative Commons

National parks are also public lands, maintained by the federal government with taxpayer money. They are, quite literally, our land. But while national parks are highly protected, the land surrounding them—as well as other public land like national forests and state parks—are much more vulnerable to exploitation under U.S. law. Now, frackers want to take advantage of that. That's bad news for the wildlife and waterways that cross park boundaries. 

Oil and gas companies already have the rights to frack on some 30 million acres of public land in the U.S., but they want more. In fact, they’re targeting more than 200 million additional acres of public lands for fracking, much of it in national forests, state parks and the areas surrounding national parks.

Here are just a few places at risk:

1. Glacier National Park

National parks like Glacier are technically protected from extractive industries like fracking within their bounds. But the land surrounding them? Frackers say that’s fair game.

Already, the National Parks Conservation Association states that visitors to Glacier's eastern boundary can “throw a stone and hit any of 16 exploratory wells and their associated holding tanks, pump jacks and machinery.”

Mountain goats in Glacier National Park, Montana. Photo credit: J. Stephen Conn / Creative Commons

2. White River National Forest

White River National Forest, in central Colorado, is the country's most visited national forest. It’s home to incredible wildlife—deer, elk, bears, mountain lions and more. None of this has stopped fossil fuel companies from pursuing the rights to frack on roughly 250,000 acres of the forest.

And earlier this year, fracking lobbyists fought back against an administrator’s attempt to restrict drilling on forest land.

White River National Forest, Colorado. Photo credit: Scott Mecum / U.S. Department of Agriculture

3. George Washington National Forest

The largest national forest in the U.S., Virginia’s George Washington National Forest has been at the center of a heated discussion about fracking’s future in the southeast. Last November, Forest Service officials approved fracking on 177,000 acres, roughly 17 percent of the forest’s land.

Commenters were quick to point out the implications not only for the forest, but also for drinking water and health for the four million people dependent on the Potomac River for drinking water.

George Washington National Forest, Virginia. Photo credit: Chesapeake Bay Program / Creative Commons

Read page 1

4. Sproul State Forest

Fracking isn’t only an issue on federally managed land. Some states have been quick to let oil and gas companies enter their state parks and Pennsylvania is one of them. Most of the state sits on top of the Marcellus Shale, a hotbed of fracking activity in the U.S.

Pennsylvania has already opened 700,000 acres of state land to industry, with much of the activity located in Sproul State Forest.

Sproul State Forest, Pennsylvania. Photo credit: Nicholas A. Tonelli / Creative Commons

5. Arapaho National Forest

Also in Colorado, the Arapaho National Forest and surrounding Pawnee National Grassland already house 63 active oil and gas wells. Almost one-third of the region’s land has been leased to private companies.

Arapaho National Forest, Colorado. Photo credit: Let Ideas Compete / Creative Commons

6. Theodore Roosevelt National Park

North Dakota is at the center of the American fracking boom, which has come at a high price for Theodore Roosevelt National Park. Once a favored haven of President Theodore Roosevelt (as the name suggests), the park is now a favored target for frackers.

Western North Dakota already hosts 45,000 operational drilling wells, with more to come. Noise from truck traffic can already be heard within the park and signs on the park’s southern border warn visitors of the hydrogen sulfide gas that pollutes the air surrounding wells. This is especially detrimental to wildlife that come and go through the park's borders into land now leased to frackers.

American bison grazing in Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota. Photo credit: Jenny W / Creative Commons

The Dangers of Fracking

Fracking is more expensive, more polluting and more dangerous than renewable energy. It releases methane, a greenhouse gas at least 85 times as powerful as carbon dioxide at disrupting the climate.

Fracking has also been linked to major air pollution and water contamination. Communities near some fracking sites have even reported being able to light the water coming out of their kitchen sinks on fire due to gas contamination.

Industry lobbyists have succeeded in delaying federal regulations on fracking, meaning the majority of fracking activity continues to take place unseen and unchecked. Even with proper oversight, there is no such thing as safe fracking—spills, leaks and other "fraccidentsare bound to occur.

In a world where we can have clean, affordable energy from the wind and the sun, why should we pursue fracking in the first place?

Fracking is diverting money and attention from the long-term solutions we need for a sustainable energy system, while contributing to global warming and environmental degradation. For the sake of our health, our climate and our public lands, it’s time to ditch fracking and start focusing on the clean energy future we need.

Let’s start by banning fracking on public lands.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

World’s Oceans Face Worst Coral Die-Off in History, Scientists Warn

Mark Ruffalo Urges Pennsylvania Governor to Enact Immediate Fracking Moratorium

Fracking Boom Goes Bust as Companies File for Bankruptcy

Chile to Create One of World’s Largest Marine Parks

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

The frozen meat section at a supermarket in Hong Kong, China, in February. Chukrut Budrul / SOPA Images / LightRocket via Getty Images

Imported frozen food in three Chinese cities has tested positive for the new coronavirus, but public health experts say you still shouldn't worry too much about catching the virus from food or packaging.

Read More Show Less
This image of the Santa Monica Mountains in California shows how a north-facing slope (left) can be covered in white-blooming hoaryleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus crassifolius), while the south-facing slope (right) is much less sparsely covered in a completely different plant. Noah Elhardt / Wikimedia Commons / CC by 2.5

By Mark Mancini

If weather is your mood, climate is your personality. That's an analogy some scientists use to help explain the difference between two words people often get mixed up.

Read More Show Less
Flames from the Lake Fire burn on a hillside near a fire truck and other vehicles on Aug. 12, 2020 in Lake Hughes, California. Mario Tama / Getty Images

An "explosive" wildfire ignited in Los Angeles county Wednesday, growing to 10,000 acres in a little less than three hours.

Read More Show Less
Although heat waves rarely get the attention that hurricanes do, they kill far more people per year in the U.S. and abroad. greenaperture / Getty Images

By Jeff Berardelli

Note: This story was originally published on August 6, 2020

If asked to recall a hurricane, odds are you'd immediately invoke memorable names like Sandy, Katrina or Harvey. You'd probably even remember something specific about the impact of the storm. But if asked to recall a heat wave, a vague recollection that it was hot during your last summer vacation may be about as specific as you can get.

Read More Show Less

A film by Felix Nuhr.

Thailand has a total population of 5,000 elephants. But of that number, 3,000 live in captivity, carrying tourists on their backs and offering photo opportunities made for social media.

Read More Show Less
Scientists have found a way to use bricks as batteries, meaning that buildings may one day be used to store and generate power. Public Domain Pictures

One of the challenges of renewable power is how to store clean energy from the sun, wind and geothermal sources. Now, a new study and advances in nanotechnology have found a method that may relieve the burden on supercapacitor storage. This method turns bricks into batteries, meaning that buildings themselves may one day be used to store and generate power, Science Times reported.

Bricks are a preferred building tool for their durability and resilience against heat and frost since they do not shrink, expand or warp in a way that compromises infrastructure. They are also reusable. What was unknown, until now, is that they can be altered to store electrical energy, according to a new study published in Nature Communications.

The scientists behind the study figured out a way to modify bricks in order to use their iconic red hue, which comes from hematite, an iron oxide, to store enough electricity to power devices, Gizmodo reported. To do that, the researchers filled bricks' pores with a nanofiber made from a conducting plastic that can store an electrical charge.

The first bricks they modified stored enough of a charge to power a small light. They can be charged in just 13 minutes and hold 10,000 charges, but the challenge is getting them to hold a much larger charge, making the technology a distant proposition.

If the capacity can be increased, researchers believe bricks can be used as a cheap alternative to lithium ion batteries — the same batteries used in laptops, phones and tablets.

The first power bricks are only one percent of a lithium-ion battery, but storage capacity can be increased tenfold by adding materials like metal oxides, Julio D'Arcy, a researcher at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, who contributed to the paper and was part of the research team, told The Guardian. But only when the storage capacity is scaled up would bricks become commercially viable.

"A solar cell on the roof of your house has to store electricity somewhere and typically we use batteries," D'Arcy told The Guardian. "What we have done is provide a new 'food-for-thought' option, but we're not there yet.

"If [that can happen], this technology is way cheaper than lithium ion batteries," D'Arcy added. "It would be a different world and you would not hear the words 'lithium ion battery' again."

Trending

Aerial view of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Gamboa, Panama, where a new soil study was held, on Sept. 11, 2019. LUIS ACOSTA / AFP via Getty Images

One of the concerns about a warming planet is the feedback loop that will emerge. That is, as the planet warms, it will melt permafrost, which will release trapped carbon and lead to more warming and more melting. Now, a new study has shown that the feedback loop won't only happen in the nether regions of the north and south, but in the tropics as well, according to a new paper in Nature.

Read More Show Less