The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Four New Feedstocks Fail to Meet Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a previous direct and final rule to amend the Renewable Fuel Standard on March 5 after environmental groups, including Friends of the Earth, submitted comments about the agency's failure to address land use change and greenhouse gas and invasive species impacts in its analysis of four new biofuel feedstocks.
The original ruling allowed four biofuel feedstocks—camelina oil, energy cane, giant reed and napiergrass—to qualify toward mandates for biofuels consumption set by the Renewable Fuel Standard. Friends of the Earth, along with the Environmental Working Group, Clean Air Task Force, National Wildlife Federation and Natural Resources Defense Council, submitted comments on the environmental threats from biofuels made of these feedstocks.
Michal Rosenoer, biofuels policy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, had the following statement in response:
"We applaud the EPA for withdrawing its decision to allow these environmentally damaging feedstocks to meet the Renewable Fuel Standard. This is a huge win for the environment and a good first step towards reconsidering what should qualify as an advanced biofuel. Biofuels must be judged according to their impacts to air, water and land as well as the climate.
"The biofuel feedstocks in question would have done serious damage to natural ecosystems and increased environmental degradation. The Renewable Fuel Standard does not have the sustainability criteria necessary to ensure that biofuels are produced in ways that protect rather than degrade the quality of the air, water, land and habitats vital to a healthy planet. We are glad the EPA looked at our comments and reversed its ruling."
For more information, click here.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
At least 1,688 dams across the U.S. are in such a hazardous condition that, if they fail, could force life-threatening floods on nearby homes, businesses, infrastructure or entire communities, according to an in-depth analysis of public records conducted by the the Associated Press.
By Sabrina Kessler
Far-reaching allegations about how a climate-sinning American multinational could shamelessly lie to the public about its wrongdoing mobilized a small group of New York students on a cold November morning. They stood in front of New York's Supreme Court last week to follow the unprecedented lawsuit against ExxonMobil.
By Alex Robinson
Leah Garcés used to hate poultry farmers.
The animal rights activist, who opposes factory farming, had an adversarial relationship with chicken farmers until around five years ago, when she sat down to listen to one. She met a poultry farmer called Craig Watts in rural North Carolina and learned that the problems stemming from factory farming extended beyond animal cruelty.
Temperatures plunged rapidly across the U.S. this week and around 70 percent of the population is expected to experience temperatures around freezing Wednesday.
In April, he claimed they caused cancer, and he sued to stop an offshore wind farm that was scheduled to go up near land he had purchased for a golf course in Aberdeenshire in Scotland. He lost that fight, and now the Trump Organization has agreed to pay the Scottish government $290,000 to cover its legal fees, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.
By Paul Brown
When countries run short of food, they need to find solutions fast, and one answer can be urban farming.
By Lakshmi Magon
This year, three studies showed that humor is useful for engaging the public about climate change. The studies, published in The Journal of Science Communication, Comedy Studies and Science Communication, added to the growing wave of scientists, entertainers and politicians who agree.