The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Four Lessons From the U.S. for Countries About to be Fracked
The U.S. has blessed the world with many wondrous things. Atomic bombs and peanut butter. Assembly lines and CocaCola. And now there is another American invention posed to spread past our borders and into your water supply: Fracking. Fracking is a technique used by the oil industry to blast apart underground shale rock layers using liquids at high pressure. The process has allowed the oil and gas industry to reach deposits of fossil fuels that were previously unreachable, and has ignited a massive increase in drilling in the U.S. It has also exposed and exacerbated the problems of fossil fuel exploitation, from pollution and environmental degradation to the social ills associated with an economy based on resource extraction. Here are some lessons we in the U.S. have learned about fracking and the companies that frack us.
Fracking Companies have Systematically Run Over Communities in the U.S.
An oil company moves into a small village. Soon pollution and poor treatment of the town’s resources by the oil corporation cause widespread outrage. To quell dissent, the oil company employs ex-soldiers and military tactics. Most Americans have the hubris to think that this would only happen in places like Indonesia and Niger—but this is the story of rural Pennsylvania, where Range Resources hired military personnel to conduct Psychological Operations, or Psyops, on Pennsylvanians opposed to drilling and fracking. One fracking executive even referred to people opposed to drilling as an “insurgency,” and recommended that other fracking companies read the Army and Marine Corps counterinsurgency manual.
Fracking companies are also fighting to nullify and prevent local fracking bans. In response to the dangers of drilling, communities above the oil and gas fields have begun to vote on and pass local bans on fracking. The fracking industry has fought back with lawsuits and political pressure, seeking to overturn the democratically voted-on resolutions.
A woman in Pennsylvania displays tap water contaminated by fracking
Fracking Contaminates Water and Water Wells and Can Suck Entire Towns Dry.
When everything goes as planned, fracking contaminates huge amounts of fresh water. In order to frack, large quantities of water and chemicals must be injected underground—two to 10 million gallons per well, per frack, and each well can be fracked multiple times. The water that gets pumped underground is purposefully laced with carcinogenic chemicals to create frack fluid, most of which stays in the well, locked underground and out of the hydrological cycle forever. What comes back to the surface, called “flowback,” is heavily contaminated by the chemical mixtures that comprise the frack fluid, as well as dissolved salts and heavy metals from deep within the Earth. Estimates from the industry indicate that drillers in Pennsylvania created approximately 19 million gallons of this wastewater per day in 2011.
When things don’t go as planned, fracking fluid spills into waterways, gets dumped into streams and rivers, or leaks underground contaminating underground aquifers.
In Texas, the demand for water for fracking was so high, an entire town was sucked dry for days on end. Texas is now building over 60 miles of water pipeline to supply the town of Barnhart, because of the water demands of fracking.
In Spite of Industry Claims, They Can’t Predict Exactly What Will Happen Underground During Fracking.
It is important to note that the high volume hydraulic fracturing we now know as fracking is a new process. The same fracking public relations machine that tells you fracking is decades old and therefore completely safe, also hails an oil man named George Mitchell as “the father of fracking.” Mitchell revolutionized the process in 1997 by adding the “high volume” part, and fracking today is done on a scope and scale that has no precedent.
Therefore it is only recently that real studies on high volume fracking have begun. Studies on such basic things as how far the fractures can go underground have already found that the fissures underground go much farther than frackers thought, a troubling revelation.
Other studies have found that the cement and steel pipes that protect aquifers from fracking fluid fail at startling rates, which causes contamination of water wells.
Fracking Leaks Methane and Other Dangerous Chemicals Into the Atmosphere at Alarming Rates.
Methane, like carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. But methane is 105 times more powerful than carbon dioxide, making even modest leaks of methane dangerous to the stability of the climate. A recent study in Colorado found that fracking wells were leaking at a rate of 60 tons of methane per hour, an astonishing rate of leakage.
Some boosters of fracking and fracked gas say that gas is a boon to the climate because it is less carbon polluting than coal. But even they admit that gas is only better than coal if less than 3.4 percent of the methane escapes unburned into the atmosphere. The leakage rates in Colorado, which amounted to 12 percent, indicate that fracked gas may be orders of magnitude more detrimental to the health of our climate than any other source of emissions.
Furthermore, the gas leaking from fracking wells is not only harmful to the global climate. It is also dangerous to breathe, being comprised of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), which cause range of deleterious health effects including cancer. Studies have found significant VOC pollution due to fracking.
So, What Would We Recommend to a Country and a People on the Verge of Being Fracked?
Watch out for unsubstantiated industry claims that fracking is safe and environmentally responsible. Fracking companies have spent millions on PR efforts to influence public opinion, very successfully in the U.S. Read the stories of people affected by fracking. Realize it is no panacea for the climate or for the economy. And let your voice be heard.
Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
‘Companies Should Not Be Allowed to Use Hazardous Ingredients in Products People Use’: Michelle Pfeiffer Speaks Up for Safer Cosmetics
The beauty products we put on our skin can have important consequences for our health. Just this March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned that some Claire's cosmetics had tested positive for asbestos. But the FDA could only issue a warning, not a recall, because current law does not empower the agency to do so.
Michelle Pfeiffer wants to change that.
The actress and Environmental Working Group (EWG) board member was spotted on Capitol Hill Thursday lobbying lawmakers on behalf of a bill that would increase oversight of the cosmetics industry, The Washington Post reported.
By Julia Conley
Scientists at the United Nations' intergovernmental body focusing on biodiversity sounded alarms earlier this month with its report on the looming potential extinction of one million species — but few heard their calls, according to a German newspaper report.
The climate crisis is a major concern for American voters with nearly 40 percent reporting the issue will help determine how they cast their ballots in the upcoming 2020 presidential election, according to a report compiled by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
Of more than 1,000 registered voters surveyed on global warming, climate and energy policies, as well as personal and collective action, 38 percent said that a candidate's position on climate change is "very important" when it comes to determining who will win their vote. Overall, democratic candidates are under more pressure to provide green solutions as part of their campaign promises with 64 percent of Democrat voters saying they prioritize the issue compared with just 34 percent of Independents and 12 percent of Republicans.
President Donald Trump has agreed to sign a $19.1 billion disaster relief bill that will help Americans still recovering from the flooding, hurricanes and wildfires that have devastated parts of the country in the past two years. Senate Republicans said they struck a deal with the president to approve the measure, despite the fact that it did not include the funding he wanted for the U.S.-Mexican border, CNN reported.
"The U.S. Senate has just approved a 19 Billion Dollar Disaster Relief Bill, with my total approval. Great!" the president tweeted Thursday.
"There was a lot of devastation throughout the state," Governor Mike Parson said at a Thursday morning press conference, as NPR reported. "We were very fortunate last night that we didn't have more injuries than what we had, and we didn't have more fatalities across the state. But three is too many."