New Scorecard Ranks Food Packaging Options by Sustainability

A newly launched guide, called the UP Scorecard, helps consumers and companies identify more sustainable packaging options. 

The scorecard tool ranks food packaging based on six main sustainability factors, including water use required for manufacturing, recoverability, chemicals used in manufacturing, plastic pollution, sourcing and climate impacts.

“With the launch of the UP Scorecard, businesses and consumers now have a powerful tool at their fingertips to help navigate the complex world of food packaging sustainability and safety,” said Plastic Pollution Coalition, which was involved with the scorecard development. “By using the UP Scorecard, you can make informed decisions that reduce your environmental impact while also protecting human health.”

Each of the six factors receives a score out of 100, with 100 being the best possible sustainability score. Then, those factors are aggregated into a final score.

For example, when comparing product choices for cups designed to hold hot liquids, like coffee, that will be sold in the U.S., users can compare steel tumblers, ceramic mugs, PLA-lined paper cups, PE-lined paper cups, insulated PLA-lined paper cups and EPS foam cups. 

In this scenario, a ceramic mug has the highest summary score of the bunch at 66. It earned 100 marks for sourcing, recoverability, and plastic pollution, but scored lower for water use, chemicals of concern, and climate impact. EPS foam cups scored the lowest in this scenario, with a 20 summary score. It earned just one point each for sourcing, recoverability, and plastic pollution, with higher scores in water use and climate impact.

The tool was first announced in 2021 and has been in beta testing. Its fully launched version has been updated to make it more comprehensive by extending the range of materials and container types included in the scorecard, expanding the list of chemicals of concern based on up-to-date scientific data and introducing product portfolio comparisons for users to compare different products. The chemicals of concern are included based on multiple risk factors, including carcinogenicity, bioaccumulation, reproductive toxicity and endocrine disruption, among others.

The new updates also allow users to track their progress in switching to more sustainable packaging options and even check forecasts to see how their switches can influence their “eco footprints.”

Another part of the latest update is a new benchmark, where users can compare their food packaging choices against a fictional model city, called Ecoville. This region serves as a sustainable benchmark that users can look to when trying to make more sustainable packaging choices.

Users can test the tool with a guest profile or save their searches and track progress by creating an account.

UP Scorecard was developed as a collaboration among NGOs, food service companies and technical experts, which were coordinated by the Food Packaging Forum Foundation. This nonprofit coalition is dubbed the Single-Use Material Decelerator, or SUM’D.

The creators will continue to update the UP Scorecard with additional regions, product types, materials and chemicals of concern, along with adjustments based on user feedback.

“As the packaging landscape evolves, the UP Scorecard will continue to evolve with it — providing transparency and a path toward a more sustainable future,” the Plastic Pollution Coalition said.