The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
A study featured in the current issue of Nature reveals that ocean warming has already affected fisheries around the world over the past four decades as fish populations shift in response to changing sea temperatures. The findings provide an indicator of the effect that climate change has on the distribution and abundance of fish. The study also points to the need for wildlife officials in New England and around the world to give fish and the ecosystems they rely upon a better chance to adapt to climate change.
“We’ve been talking about climate change as if it’s something that’s going to happen in the distant future–our study shows that it has been affecting our fisheries and oceans for decades,” said Dr. Daniel Pauly, co-author of the study, in a press release from the University of British Columbia, where he is principal investigator with the school’s Sea Around Us Project.
That is especially true for New England, where sea temperatures last year were the warmest ever recorded.
“Places like New England saw new species typically found in warmer waters, closer to the tropics,” said William Cheung, co-author of the study and assistant professor at the University of British Columbia.
As Talking Fish reported, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officials have the opportunity to help fish adapt to these changes if they make the right call on a pending decision regarding large swaths of protected waters here in New England. Rising sea temperatures will further stress species already struggling to recover from decades of past overfishing and damage to seafloor habitat. A recent NOAA document outlines a sound strategy to help fish species survive the additional pressure of climate change. The strategy’s top priority is to “conserve habitat to support healthy fish.”
Unfortunately, NOAA fisheries officials are considering a proposal that would instead sharply reduce habitat protections in New England waters. The proposal would allow bottom trawl fishing in some 5,000 sq. miles of closed areas—waters that have sheltered spawning and juvenile fish since at least the mid-1990s.
Some in the fishing industry argue that the closed areas somehow don’t count as habitat. The fish certainly seem to think that it’s habitat, as they use these areas for spawning and shelter. And last month more than 100 prominent scientists sent a letter to NOAA citing the numerous studies documenting the habitat benefits of these areas and the harm caused by bottom trawl fishing.
The Nature study is a stark reminder that climate change is a serious challenge in the here and now, not off in the distant future. It’s time for fisheries managers to start acting on that.
Visit EcoWatch’s BIODIVERSITY page for more related news on this topic.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Paul Brown
When countries run short of food, they need to find solutions fast, and one answer can be urban farming.
By Lakshmi Magon
This year, three studies showed that humor is useful for engaging the public about climate change. The studies, published in The Journal of Science Communication, Comedy Studies and Science Communication, added to the growing wave of scientists, entertainers and politicians who agree.
By Tara Lohan
If I were to open my refrigerator, the origins of most of the food wouldn't be too much of a mystery — the milk, cheese and produce all come from relatively nearby farms. I can tell from the labels on other packaged goods if they're fair trade, non-GMO or organic.
By Mark Hertsgaard and Kyle Pope
Some good news, for a change, about climate change: When hundreds of newsrooms focus their attention on the climate crisis, all at the same time, the public conversation about the problem gets better: more prominent, more informative, more urgent.