EcoWatch
Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k Subscribe Subscribe
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Conservation
  • Food + Agriculture
  • Renewables
  • Oceans
  • Policy
  • Insights + Opinion
  • Go Solar Today
      • Top Companies By State
        • California Solar Companies
        • Texas Solar Companies
        • New York Solar Companies
        • Florida Solar Companies
        • See All States
      • Top Incentives By State
        • California Solar Incentives
        • Texas Solar Incentives
        • New York Solar Incentives
        • Florida Solar Incentives
        • See All States
      • Solar Panel Costs By State
        • Solar Panel Costs in California
        • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
        • Solar Panel Costs in New York
        • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
        • See All States
      • Value of Solar by State
        • Is Solar Worth It In California?
        • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
        • Is Solar Worth It New York?
        • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
        • See All States
      • Company Reviews
        • Tesla Solar Review
        • Sunrun Solar Review
        • SunPower Solar Review
        • Vivint Solar Review
        • See All Companies
      • Common Solar Questions
        • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
        • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
        • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
        • Can You Finance Solar?
        • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
        • Payback On Solar Panels?
      • Solar Resources
        • Interactive Solar Calculator
        • Federal Solar Tax Credit
        • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
        • Tesla Solar Roof Review
        • Cheapest Solar Panels
      • Companies Compared
        • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs SunPower
        • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
        • SunPower vs ADT Solar
EcoWatch
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Conservation
  • Food + Agriculture
  • Renewables
  • Oceans
  • Policy
  • Insights + Opinion
  • Go Solar Today
    • Go Solar Today
    • Top Companies By State
      • California Solar Companies
      • Texas Solar Companies
      • New York Solar Companies
      • Florida Solar Companies
      • See All States
    • Top Incentives By State
      • California Solar Incentives
      • Texas Solar Incentives
      • New York Solar Incentives
      • Florida Solar Incentives
      • See All States
    • Solar Panel Costs By State
      • Solar Panel Costs in California
      • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
      • Solar Panel Costs in New York
      • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
      • See All States
    • Value of Solar by State
      • Is Solar Worth It In California?
      • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
      • Is Solar Worth It New York?
      • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
      • See All States
    • Company Reviews
      • Tesla Solar Review
      • Sunrun Solar Review
      • SunPower Solar Review
      • Vivint Solar Review
      • See All Companies
    • Common Solar Questions
      • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
      • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
      • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
      • Can You Finance Solar?
      • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
      • Payback On Solar Panels?
    • Solar Resources
      • Interactive Solar Calculator
      • Federal Solar Tax Credit
      • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
      • Tesla Solar Roof Review
      • Cheapest Solar Panels
    • Companies Compared
      • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs SunPower
      • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
      • SunPower vs ADT Solar

The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k
    EcoWatch
    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k
    Home Policy

    EPA Proposes First Legal Limits for PFAS in Drinking Water

    By: Olivia Rosane
    Published: March 14, 2023
    Edited by Chris McDermott
    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon
    Water samples collected for PFAS testing in the Kalamazoo River watershed in Michigan
    Water samples collected for PFAS testing, from Portage Creek in the Kalamazoo River watershed in Michigan in 2018. Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy / CC BY-ND 2.0
    Why you can trust us

    Founded in 2005 as an Ohio-based environmental newspaper, EcoWatch is a digital platform dedicated to publishing quality, science-based content on environmental issues, causes, and solutions.

    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

    For the first time, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed standards for limiting toxic forever chemicals in drinking water.

    The draft regulation, unveiled Tuesday, would target six types of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that are known to be found in drinking water, setting legal limits for their presence. 

    “EPA’s proposal to establish a national standard for PFAS in drinking water is informed by the best available science, and would help provide states with the guidance they need to make decisions that best protect their communities,” EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan said in an agency press release. “This action has the potential to prevent tens of thousands of PFAS-related illnesses and marks a major step toward safeguarding all our communities from these dangerous contaminants.”

    For years, I’ve been clear: EPA must take action to protect communities from PFAS pollution.

    That’s why I’m proud to announce that @EPA is proposing the first-ever national standard to limit PFAS in drinking water.https://t.co/36AJIo0Qdd pic.twitter.com/kKOCgjDqmy

    — Michael Regan, U.S. EPA (@EPAMichaelRegan) March 14, 2023

    PFAS are a class of thousands of chemicals that have been widely used by industry since the mid-twentieth century for a variety of uses including firefighting foam, nonstick cookware and stain- or -water-resistant textiles. They have earned their moniker “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily in the human body or the environment — they are present in the drinking water of around 200 million U.S. residents and the blood serum of the majority of people tested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This is a concern because PFAS exposure has been linked to health problems from immunosuppression to developmental issues to cancer. 

    More From EcoWatch
    • Solar Water Heaters Guide
    • The Best Solar Powered Water Pumps
    • Inflation Reduction Act Solar Rebate and Credit Guide

    The Biden administration has taken steps to address PFAS pollution by, among other things, updating the health advisory levels for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) — two of the most common PFAS — in drinking water, proposing that the same two PFAS be listed as hazardous substances under the Superfund law and channeling $10 billion towards dealing with new contaminants via the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. However, Tuesday’s proposal marks the first time that the federal government has set enforceable limits on the chemicals. 

    The proposed rule would regulate PFOS and PFOA as individual contaminants. The Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for these chemicals in drinking water would be set at four parts per trillion, which is the level at which it is possible to measure them accurately. 

    It would also regulate four other PFAS — PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and GenX Chemicals — as a mixture. This means that drinking water systems would use a hazard index calculation to determine if a mix containing one or more of these chemicals posed a threat. Public water systems would then need to test regularly for the regulated PFAS, publicize the test results and reduce the concentration of the chemicals if it exceeds the legal limits. 

    “EPA expects that if fully implemented, the rule will prevent thousands of deaths and reduce tens of thousands of serious PFAS-attributable illnesses,” the agency wrote.

    The move was widely praised by environmental advocates. 

    “After decades of delay, President Biden’s EPA has delivered a drinking water standard for PFOA and PFOS which, when finalized, will be the toughest in the nation,”  activist and actor Mark Ruffalo said in the EPA release. “By proposing to regulate four other PFAS as a mixture, the Biden EPA is also putting our communities ahead of the polluters.”

    The polluters, predictably, were less thrilled. Industry group the American Chemistry Council (ACC) said in a statement shared with EcoWatch that it welcomed attempts to regulate PFOS and PFOA — which all of its members had phased out more than eight years ago. However, it took issue with the MCLs proposed by the EPA, as well as its decision to assess multiple chemicals under a single index. 

    “The EPA’s misguided approach to these MCLs is important, as these low limits will likely result in billions of dollars in compliance costs,” an ACC spokesperson said. “The proposals have important implications for broader drinking water policy priorities and resources, so it’s critical that EPA gets the science right. We look forward to reviewing these proposals in detail and commenting to EPA throughout the process.”

    Environmental advocates, on the other hand, warned against industry influence in the final rule. 

    “For the millions of people with PFAS in their tap water, strong national drinking water standards cannot come soon enough,” Earthjustice attorney Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz said in a statement emailed to EcoWatch. “Today’s proposal is a necessary and long overdue step towards addressing the nation’s PFAS crisis, but what comes next is equally important. EPA must resist efforts to weaken this proposal, move quickly to finalize health-protective limits on these six chemicals, and address the remaining PFAS that continue to poison drinking water supplies and harm communities across the country.”

    The EPA expects to have a final rule ready by the end of the year.

    Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

      By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, and to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

      Olivia Rosane

      Olivia Rosane is an environmental journalist with a decade’s worth of experience. She has been contributing to EcoWatch since 2018 and has also covered environmental themes for Common Dreams, Atmos, Rewilding, Seattle Met, Treehugger, The Trouble, YES! Magazine and Real Life. She holds a Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Cambridge and a master’s in Art and Politics from Goldsmiths, University of London.
      Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

      Read More

      Pollination ‘Magic’ Happens at Night Too, First-of-Its-Kind Study Finds
      Pollinators are essential for the reproduction of most plant species,
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
      Humpback Whales Give Birth During Epic Migrations and Continue Traveling: Study
      Scientists once believed that humpback whales only gave birth in
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
      Plants Produce More Nectar in Response to the Sound of Buzzing Bees: Study
      When plants hear the buzzing of bees collecting nectar, they
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes

      Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

        By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, and to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

        Latest Articles

        • Pollination ‘Magic’ Happens at Night Too, First-of-Its-Kind Study Finds
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          May 23, 2025
        • Humpback Whales Give Birth During Epic Migrations and Continue Traveling: Study
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          May 23, 2025
        • Plants Produce More Nectar in Response to the Sound of Buzzing Bees: Study
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          May 23, 2025
        • NOAA: 2025 Atlantic Hurricane Season Predicted to Be Above Normal With 13 to 19 Named Storms
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          May 22, 2025
        • IEA Warns of Potential Shortages of Copper as Demand Increases For Renewables
          by Paige Bennett
          May 22, 2025
        • States Can Take Meaningful Climate Action, Even Without Federal Support: Study
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          May 22, 2025
        • Cultural Values on Indigenous Lands Help Forests Thrive at Nearly Twice the Rate of Protected Areas: Study
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          May 21, 2025
        • Removal of Invasive Bullfrogs Leads to Increase of Native Pond Turtles in Yosemite, Study Finds
          by Paige Bennett
          May 21, 2025
        EcoWatch

        The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

          • Climate Climate
          • Animals Animals
          • Health + Wellness Health + Wellness
          • Insights + Opinion Insights + Opinion
          • Adventure Adventure
          • Oceans Oceans
          • Business Business
          • Solar Solar
          • About EcoWatch
          • Contact EcoWatch
          • EcoWatch Reviews
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy Policy
          • Learn About Solar Energy
          • Learn About Deregulated Energy
          • EcoWatch UK
          Follow Us
          Facebook 558k
          Twitter 222k
          Instagram 52k
          Subscribe Subscribe

          Experts for a healthier planet and life.

          Mentioned by:
          Learn more
          • Privacy Policy
          • Terms of Use
          • Cookie Preferences
          • Do Not Sell My Information
          © 2025 EcoWatch. All Rights Reserved.

          Advertiser Disclosure

          Our editorial team is committed to creating independent and objective content focused on helping our readers make informed decisions. To help support these efforts we receive compensation from companies that advertise with us.

          The compensation we receive from these companies may impact how and where products appear on this site. This compensation does not influence the recommendations or advice our editorial team provides within our content. We do not include all companies, products or offers that may be available.