EPA Chief Gina McCarthy Calls Out Climate Deniers
In a speech yesterday at environmental think tank Resources for the Future, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) head Gina McCarthy said it was "sad" that those who deny the need for action on climate change hide behind the excuse that it will hurt the economy. She made the case that it was not taking action that would do, defending the steps that President Obama has announced in recent weeks, including at this week's UN Climate Summit, as a boon to the U.S. economy.
"Simply put: the economy isn’t a reason to fear action, it’s a reason to take it," she said. "We don’t have to choose between a healthy environment and a healthy economy. They’re not separate—they’re intertwined. A world-leading economy depends on a healthy environment and a stable climate."
Much of her speech played on the traditional image of America as a country with a fierce pride in its can-do attitude.
"Can you imagine President Kennedy looking up at the moon and saying, 'Nah ... we’ll just wait for someone else do it,'" she said, referring to Kennedy's memorable "We choose to go to the moon" speech of September 1962 in which he said "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone and one which we intend to win."
She pointed to America's leadership in another battle as well: saving the ozone layer.
"The world needed a solution," she said. "It needed a leader. The United States didn’t temper its resolve, despite the hesitation of other nations. American science identified the problem. American industry innovated the solution. Because we acted, the ozone layer is healing. Our people are safer. And our economy is stronger."
She reminded her audience that it was the same old story with the nearsighted deniers then too: "Back when we took action to heal the ozone layer, special interest critics manufactured doomsday predictions. They spun stories of supermarket refrigerators shutting off and manufacturing plants shutting down. Guess what? None of it happened. If those scare tactics sound familiar, it’s because they’re the same ones we hear today on climate change."
McCarthy enumerated the ways in which failing to take action will cost the economy: food and gas prices, the cost of combatting fires, droughts and floods, health impacts, insurance. And she talked about actions already taken including fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, the exponential growth in solar and wind energy and the jobs they have already created, states that have enacted standards to cut emissions, saying "When it comes to the American economy, cutting pollution doesn’t dull our competitive edge, it sharpens it."
She then lit into the naysayers.
"It’s sad to see a small but vocal group of critics hide behind the word 'economy' to protect their own special interests; when the truth is, climate action is in everyone’s best interest," she said. "It’s worrisome when we hear those critics say, quote, '… I’m not a scientist, but climate action is going to ruin the economy …' Well, as President Obama has said, those critics have one thing right: they are not scientists. They’re not economists, either. ... Those same critics point fingers at other nations dragging their feet as an excuse for the United States to stand still. We don’t hide behind the inaction of other nations as an excuse for mediocrity. We are not about stagnation, we are about innovation."
She said that states like Oklahoma, Louisiana, Texas and Arkansas that produce some of the most vocal climate deniers could see an annual net benefit of about $16 billion by embracing solutions to climate change.
Predictably, those with a financial interest in the status quo responded as if they weren't even listening.
Laura Sheehan, senior vice president for communications at the American Coalition for Clean Coal Energy retorted, "Administrator McCarthy must be wishing on a star to compare President Kennedy’s space mission, which had real-world benefits, to President Obama’s climate plan, that will hurt the U.S. economy, cost Americans jobs and do virtually nothing to impact climate change in any meaningful way. With other nations pursuing smart, economically viable energy policies, President Obama’s approach makes America the loser when it comes to energy and manufacturing innovation. The Obama administration’s failure to come clean about the facts, choosing instead to hide behind over-the-top, scare-inducing rhetoric, affirms that we must expose the truth about the proposal’s economic consequences and stop it from moving forward.”
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
England's Somerset county can now boast its first beaver dam in more than 400 years.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Alex McInturff, Christine Wilkinson and Wenjing Xu
What is the most common form of human infrastructure in the world? It may well be the fence. Recent estimates suggest that the total length of all fencing around the globe is 10 times greater than the total length of roads. If our planet's fences were stretched end to end, they would likely bridge the distance from Earth to the Sun multiple times.
Early advertisement for barbed wire fencing, 1880-1889. The advent of barbed wire dramatically changed ranching and land use in the American West by ending the open range system. Kansas Historical Society / CC BY-ND
The authors assembled a conservative data set of potential fence lines across the U.S. West. They calculated the nearest distance to any given fence to be less than 31 miles (50 kilometers), with a mean of about 2 miles (3.1 kilometers). McInturff et al,. 2020 / CC BY-ND
- 'This Is Not Like a Fence in a Backyard' — Trump's Border Wall vs ... ›
- New Border Wall Construction Threatens 8 Species With Extinction ... ›
Climate change is making ancient Hopi farming nearly impossible, threatening not just the Tribe's staple food source, but a pillar of its culture and religion, the Arizona Republic reports.
- These Are the Challenges Facing India's Most Sacred River ... ›
- Oil Spill Causes 'Major Disaster' for Ganges River Dolphins ... ›
By Kenny Stancil
An expert panel of top international and environmental lawyers have begun working this month on a legal definition of "ecocide" with the goal of making mass ecological damage an enforceable international crime on par with war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
- Are the Amazon Fires a Crime Against Humanity? - EcoWatch ›
- 'Her Work Will Live On': Climate Movement Mourns Loss of Ecocide ... ›