By Kieran Cooke
The electric bus would have let Londoners enjoy clean air early in the twentieth century, saving millions of people from breathing problems and premature death, but dishonesty and double-dealing promoted the internal combustion engine instead.
The world is only now slowly waking up to the scale of the problem. Air pollution caused by fumes from the hundreds of thousands of vehicles on our roads is one of the big killers of the modern age, especially in cities, and is, along with climate change, a serious threat to the future of the planet.
At least 40,000 deaths in London each year are attributed to outdoor air pollution, much of it the result of the noxious fumes emitted from internal combustion engine-driven cars, trucks and buses, particularly those fueled by diesel.
Yet, as investigative journalist Mick Hamer wrote in his excellent new book A Most Deliberate Swindle, much of this pollution could have been avoided.
More than a century ago the technology existed for electric vehicles, hailed today as one of the main ways to tackle the urban pollution crisis. The adoption of a revolutionary vehicle called the electrobus could have ushered in an age of clean transport and clean air.
Hamer tells the story of how a massive fraud of shareholders and various other scurrilous activities acted as a severe brake on the development of electric transport.
"One thing is pretty certain," wrote Hamer. "The electric vehicle wouldn't have been stuck in the doldrums for a century, and today's electric revival wouldn't have had to start from zero.
"Our cities could have been a whole lot cleaner, healthier and quieter. The electrobus swindle didn't just impoverish the shareholders of Edwardian England. We were all robbed."
Turn the clock back to 1906, when the age of horse-drawn public transport is gradually coming to an end in the United Kingdom. A number of petrol-fueled buses are on London's streets. They are noisy and smelly—some of them catch fire. They are prone to breakdown.
The electrobus—powered by batteries—is noiseless, emits no fumes and is more reliable. Its backers say it's also cheaper to run than petrol vehicles.
This was the age of the entrepreneurial investor, a time when members of the public were caught up in a rush to become shareholders in all manner of get-rich-quick schemes—from gold mines in the Amazon to rubber plantations in Malaya.
Shares in Demand
The public fell over itself to buy shares in the London Electrobus Company and what was considered to be "the aristocrat among public conveyances."
The problem was that while the basic idea of the bus was sound, the people behind it were not. Hamer lists a colorful cast of devious characters—headed by a German-born lawyer and including the nephew of the Greek prime minister and his astrologer, a music hall artist, a crooked judge and a gunrunner.
Shareholders were systematically deceived by "solicitors and accountants who could not be trusted to add up the pennies in a child's piggy bank."
"On top of the fraud, bribery and blackmail, there was champagne, sex, juicy divorce cases, a drunken brawl and motoring derring-do. This was no longer a simple story about an electric bus."
Some electrobuses did run on London's streets. Harrods, the fashionable department store, used electric delivery vans till 1918.
In 1911 a fleet of 17 electric and hybrid buses was running in Brighton, on England's south coast, but by then the London Electrobus Company—wracked by court cases and press exposés of its fraudulent goings-on—had gone into liquidation.
Boost for Oil
Along with Henry Ford's model T car, internal combustion-powered buses were starting to be mass-produced, and costs dropped. Oil consumption grew dramatically.
Perhaps the air would be a lot better today if it weren't for those fraudsters of more than 100 years ago.
"If battery power worked for buses then other vehicles might have followed suit," said Hamer.
"In the grand scheme of things, the failure of an electric bus may seem trivial, but it led ultimately to the failure of electric delivery vehicles," Hamer added.
"The result was a resounding victory for the internal combustion engine, which in turn established acceptable levels of noise and pollution. We still hear and breathe these consequences today."
Reposted with permission from our media associate Climate News Network.