Quantcast
Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

Help Support EcoWatch

Delaware Riverkeeper Opposes Proposed Pennsylvania Air Emissions Permit

Energy
Delaware Riverkeeper Opposes Proposed Pennsylvania Air Emissions Permit

Delaware Riverkeeper Network

Delaware Riverkeeper Network submitted comments on May 23 to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s (PADEP) Air Quality Bureau in Harrisburg regarding PADEP’s proposed revisions to the General Plan Approval and/or General Operating Permit for Natural Gas Production and Processing Facilities, known as GP-5. PADEP noticed the proposed revisions in March with a comment deadline of May 2 but then extended the comment period to May 23. The revisions apply to natural gas operations throughout the Commonwealth and were necessary to address changes in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) performance standards and national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants.

For a copy of DRN’s comments, click here.

DRN’s comment focuses on the issue of atmospheric deposition of airborne pollutants from natural gas production and processing facilities. DRN concludes that the proposed GP-5 is not effective for the protection of human health or the environment and advocates that PADEP correct the deficiencies in the proposed permit before moving ahead.

“The deposition of pollutants emitted by natural gas operations on to water will lead to water quality degradation and provides a substantial pollution pathway that PADEP does not address in the proposed GP-5," said Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper. “This is a huge missing piece of the air pollution puzzle that faces all Pennsylvanians because of the dangerous pollutants the gas industry emits. The problem must be solved by addressing the whole picture, not just little bits. PADEP needs to fix this and fix it now,” said van Rossum.

DRN engaged an air expert, Cherelle Blazer, MESc, of Texas to conduct a technical review of the GP-5 in regards to the issue of the deposition of air pollution on water; her report is included in the link to DRN comments above. Ms. Blazer found the proposed permit revisions to be inadequate in protecting public health and the environment because it does not go far enough in addressing the problem of deposition. Ms. Blazer recommends action be taken to analyze cumulative effects and then institute a plan to address them, to make more substantive cuts to emissions and to explore ways to prevent emissions such as restricting certain polluting activities (i.e. gas well flaring).

Ms. Blazer reviewed the scientific literature on this issue and points out that employing Best Available Control Technology (BACT), which is the primary method used in the GP-5, is simply not enough to keep air emissions from degrading the environment. In fact, the use of BACT in other parts of the country where drilling has been occurring has not resulted in effectively controlling nitrogen and sulfate, two of the dangerous air pollutants emitted by gas facilities that are deposited on to water. In Sublette County, Wyoming, where BACT is mandatory, nitrate and sulfate emissions have actually increased and there is evidence of atmospheric deposition in the water and on the land near gas fields there. Ms. Blazer points out that the proposed GP-5 permit can result in the same situation in Pennsylvania.

“Many pollutants are released by natural gas activities and they all must be stopped. Some of these toxics are deposited on land, vegetation and surface water, where they cause water quality pollution that affect millions more people downstream as well as downwind. PADEP is proposing to do the same old thing—a strictly technological fix. Well, this isn’t working anywhere in the nation. PADEP needs a new model—they need to prevent the pollution that is harming people and polluting our air and water,” said Tracy Carluccio, deputy director, Delaware Riverkeeper Network.

For more information on gas drilling, click here.

Visit EcoWatch's FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.

In an ad released by Republican Voters Against Trump, former coronavirus task force member Olivia Troye roasted the president for his response. Republican Voters Against Trump / YouTube

Yet another former Trump administration staffer has come out with an endorsement for former Vice President Joe Biden, this time in response to President Donald Trump's handling of the coronavirus pandemic.

Read More Show Less

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

Climate Group

Every September for the past 11 years, non-profit the Climate Group has hosted Climate Week NYC, a chance for business, government, activist and community leaders to come together and discuss solutions to the climate crisis.

Read More Show Less

Trending

A field of sunflowers near the Mehrum coal-fired power station, wind turbines and high-voltage lines in the Peine district of Germany on Aug. 3, 2020. Julian Stratenschulte / picture alliance via Getty Images

By Elliot Douglas

The coronavirus pandemic has altered economic priorities for governments around the world. But as wildfires tear up the west coast of the United States and Europe reels after one of its hottest summers on record, tackling climate change remains at the forefront of economic policy.

Read More Show Less
Monarch butterflies in Mexico's Oyamel forest in Michoacan, Mexico after migrating from Canada. Luis Acosta / AFP / Getty Images

By D. André Green II

One of nature's epic events is underway: Monarch butterflies' fall migration. Departing from all across the United States and Canada, the butterflies travel up to 2,500 miles to cluster at the same locations in Mexico or along the Pacific Coast where their great-grandparents spent the previous winter.

Read More Show Less
The 30th First Annual Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony on Sept. 17 introduced ten new Ig Nobel Prize winners, each intended to make people "laugh then think." Improbable Research / YouTube

The annual Ig Nobel prizes were awarded Thursday by the science humor magazine Annals of Improbable Research for scientific experiments that seem somewhat absurd, but are also thought-provoking. This was the 30th year the awards have been presented, but the first time they were not presented at Harvard University. Instead, they were delivered in a 75-minute pre-recorded ceremony.

Read More Show Less

Support Ecowatch