Delaware Riverkeeper Network Calls on Sen. McIlhinney to Retract Misinformation
Delaware Riverkeeper Network sent a letter on Feb. 24 to State Sen. Chuck McIlhinney (R-10) calling for him to retract his recent public statements misinterpreting Act 13, the law enacted with the passage of HB1950, the Marcellus Shale law that adopts sweeping changes to the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Act and preempts municipalities’ control of gas drilling, exposing local residents to greater risk of pollution and community degradation from natural gas operations throughout the Commonwealth. Sen. McIlhinney had gone on record opposing HB1950’s gutting of municipal rights but then voted for the measure, casting one of a handful of critical votes that allowed the municipal takeover bill to pass.
Sen. McIlhinney has falsely claimed that Act 13, signed into law last week by Gov. Corbett, does not remove municipal controls and has defended the law as a financial benefit. Delaware Riverkeeper Network has rebuked the senator for misleading communities, including his constituents, as to what the law really requires and—considering his gross misinterpretation of the law—soundly criticized him for not knowing what he actually voted for. The group has petitioned the senator to immediately retract his false statements and set the record straight.
The letter submitted to the senator this morning is attached and copied below:
February 24, 2012
State Senator Charles T. McIlhinney, Jr.
10th Senatorial District
22 S. Main St.
Doylestown, PA 18901
Dear Senator McIlhinney,
Your published editorial claiming that the new legislation that you supported (Act 13) does not prevent municipalities from passing stricter zoning than the new law’s standards is incorrect. You go on to claim “In fact, a municipality is well within its rights to pass zoning laws that prohibit a single natural gas well from being drilled within its borders”. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are concerned that citizens and municipal officials are going to be confused by this false information, and in reliance upon it may take actions that could subject them to serious consequences that they are not anticipating nor ready for—and so we urge you to please have a retraction printed in the newspaper and ensure a copy is mailed to every municipality in the region.
Act 13 preempts local zoning of gas operations, including gas wells, pipelines, and other gas “operations” and applies universally to all municipalities in Pennsylvania, regardless of whether they decide to collect an impact fee through Act 13. Municipalities have NO CHOICE as to whether the standards in Act 13 apply to them or not; no municipality can escape the new law.
The law, by clear language, forces municipalities to allow gas drilling and “oil and gas operations”, except for natural gas processing plants, in all zoning districts within their boundaries. “Oil and gas operations” is defined broadly and includes gas well drilling, hydraulic fracturing (or “fracking”), location assessment, seismic testing, and pipeline operations. How can you assert that a gas well can be prevented by a municipality when the law states clearly that gas wells and these related operations must be allowed? Allowing such misinformation to stand subjects municipalities, municipal officials and the citizens of the Commonwealth to serious consequences for actions they may take in reliance upon it.
Open waste pits—which hold fracking chemicals, flowback and other dangerous pollutants such as radioactive materials, hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds, heavy metals, and gaseous toxins that are freely released to the air and can be spilled or leaked—must be allowed under the new law in all zoning districts, including residential districts, so long as they are not closer than 300 feet from an existing building. Three hundred feet is less than a football field (360 feet) in length—if this isn’t “near schools and hospitals”, as you claim in your editorial, your definition of “near” is terribly wrong.
Act 13 also requires municipalities to allow natural gas compressor stations as uses permitted by right in agricultural and industrial districts, and as conditional uses in all other zoning districts. Pipelines and their requisite compressor stations are expected to multiply as gas companies seek to deliver their product to market. Even in communities where no drilling is occurring, gas pipelines and compressor stations are being built. How will Bucks County’s farms defend themselves now that Act 13 forces these industrial facilities into agricultural areas? And into all other districts with limited ability to control the operations through conditions?
Municipalities are also deprived of any meaningful role in state permitting. A municipality can submit comments to PADEP on permit applications for gas operations but PADEP is NOT REQUIRED TO EVEN CONSIDER those comments. Even worse, Act 13 prevents municipalities from appealing PADEP permitting decisions for oil and gas permits. The municipality, with its knowledge and responsibility to safeguard residents and important community resources, is prohibited from defending them as a result of Act 13.
The bottom line is that municipalities must allow industrial activities and the pollution hazards that accompany these operations in non-industrial areas with little ability to protect the community and surrounding resources. The fundamental role that municipalities must play in protecting their community and resources is eliminated by Act 13. The result will be people living cheek-to-jowl with gas operations and all the human health, safety and community costs that come with that proximity.
Your promotion of Act 13 by touting the new funding it will bring “without a single new well being drilled” is particularly offensive. First of all, your prediction that this could be the case for Bucks County exposes a misunderstanding on your part which is unfathomable considering that you voted for the law and are now standing as one of its staunchest supporters. Act 13 applies to gas operations, not only gas wells, and Bucks County can expect to see its share of gas pipelines, compressor stations, and processing facilities. Further, an application to drill a new gas well has already been filed with PADEP in Nockamixon Township by Turm Oil in a location prohibited for gas drilling by the Township’s current zoning—so clearly Bucks County is already being targeted by the oil and gas industry for development and they are already trying to take advantage of Act 13’s free-reign.
But perhaps more importantly, your thinking belies an “island” mentality that is one of the underlying problems that led to the passage of this shortsighted and pernicious law. The idea that Bucks County should reap funds on the backs of communities across the Commonwealth where gas drilling is occurring is repugnant. The alarming rate of violations of environmental permits by gas and oil operators, the proliferation of accidents and spills in drilling regions, the increasing rate of permit issuance by PADEP without needed oversight, is resulting in an unbearable toll being borne by communities and the environment in drilling regions. Citizens of this Commonwealth are losing their drinking water, their health, their livestock, the value of their properties, their peace of mind and their quality of life—to suggest that this is all justified so others can reap some financial windfall is, again, repugnant. Your “island” frame of mind lacks the basic recognition of the common good and the value of our shared resources in the Commonwealth.
As the oil and gas industry builds out without adequate regulatory limits and with inadequate technical practices, the price of that impact fee will become heavier and heavier. It is simply unacceptable that some parts of the State should reap profits while others carry the load. And even if you do not agree, please remember that everything that happens upstream affects us downstream and the Marcellus Shale regions in the Upper and Middle Delaware River Watershed are already heavily leased; if drilling is allowed to commence in the Delaware River Watershed, the impacts to Bucks County’s environment and communities will be inescapable.
And let’s not forget that none of us will truly escape the far-reaching costs of unbridled resource extraction. Just look at the tens of thousands of miles of Pennsylvania’s waterways that have been ruined by the coal industry over the past century. Haven’t we learned anything from that polluting legacy that we as taxpayers are still paying to clean up?
We respectfully request that you retract your editorial and correct the misinformation you have issued to the public. Your interpretation of Act 13 in regards to how it will affect municipalities is dead wrong. You owe it to the public to set the record straight.
Maya K. van Rossum Tracy Carluccio
the Delaware Riverkeeper Deputy Director
For more information, click here.
New fossils uncovered in Argentina may belong to one of the largest animals to have walked on Earth.
- Groundbreaking Fossil Shows Prehistoric 15-Foot Reptile Tried to ... ›
- Skull of Smallest Known Dinosaur Found in 99-Million-Year Old Amber ›
- Giant 'Toothed' Birds Flew Over Antarctica 40 Million Years Ago ... ›
- World's Second-Largest Egg Found in Antarctica Probably Hatched ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
- Pruitt Guts the Clean Power Plan: How Weak Will the New EPA ... ›
- It's Official: Trump Administration to Repeal Clean Power Plan ... ›
- 'Deadly' Clean Power Plan Replacement ›
By Jonathan Runstadler and Kaitlin Sawatzki
Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers have found coronavirus infections in pet cats and dogs and in multiple zoo animals, including big cats and gorillas. These infections have even happened when staff were using personal protective equipment.
- Gorillas in San Diego Test Positive for Coronavirus - EcoWatch ›
- Wildlife Rehabilitators Are Overwhelmed During the Pandemic. In ... ›
- Coronavirus Pandemic Linked to Destruction of Wildlife and World's ... ›
- Utah Mink Becomes First Wild Animal to Test Positive for Coronavirus ›
By Peter Giger
The speed and scale of the response to COVID-19 by governments, businesses and individuals seems to provide hope that we can react to the climate change crisis in a similarly decisive manner - but history tells us that humans do not react to slow-moving and distant threats.
A Game of Jenga<p>Think of it as a game of Jenga and the planet's climate system as the tower. For generations, we have been slowly removing blocks. But at some point, we will remove a pivotal block, such as the collapse of one of the major global ocean circulation systems, for example the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), that will cause all or part of the global climate system to fall into a planetary emergency.</p><p>But worse still, it could cause runaway damage: Where the tipping points form a domino-like cascade, where breaching one triggers breaches of others, creating an unstoppable shift to a radically and swiftly changing climate.</p><p>One of the most concerning tipping points is mass methane release. Methane can be found in deep freeze storage within permafrost and at the bottom of the deepest oceans in the form of methane hydrates. But rising sea and air temperatures are beginning to thaw these stores of methane.</p><p>This would release a powerful greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, 30-times more potent than carbon dioxide as a global warming agent. This would drastically increase temperatures and rush us towards the breach of other tipping points.</p><p>This could include the acceleration of ice thaw on all three of the globe's large, land-based ice sheets – Greenland, West Antarctica and the Wilkes Basin in East Antarctica. The potential collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet is seen as a key tipping point, as its loss could eventually <a href="https://science.sciencemag.org/content/324/5929/901" target="_blank">raise global sea levels by 3.3 meters</a> with important regional variations.</p><p>More than that, we would be on the irreversible path to full land-ice melt, causing sea levels to rise by up to 30 meters, roughly at the rate of two meters per century, or maybe faster. Just look at the raised beaches around the world, at the last high stand of global sea level, at the end of the Pleistocene period around 120,0000 years ago, to see the evidence of such a warm world, which was just 2°C warmer than the present day.</p>
Cutting Off Circulation<p>As well as devastating low-lying and coastal areas around the world, melting polar ice could set off another tipping point: a disablement to the AMOC.</p><p>This circulation system drives a northward flow of warm, salty water on the upper layers of the ocean from the tropics to the northeast Atlantic region, and a southward flow of cold water deep in the ocean.</p><p>The ocean conveyor belt has a major effect on the climate, seasonal cycles and temperature in western and northern Europe. It means the region is warmer than other areas of similar latitude.</p><p>But melting ice from the Greenland ice sheet could threaten the AMOC system. It would dilute the salty sea water in the north Atlantic, making the water lighter and less able or unable to sink. This would slow the engine that drives this ocean circulation.</p><p><a href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/atlantic-conveyor-belt-has-slowed-15-per-cent-since-mid-twentieth-century" target="_blank">Recent research</a> suggests the AMOC has already weakened by around 15% since the middle of the 20th century. If this continues, it could have a major impact on the climate of the northern hemisphere, but particularly Europe. It may even lead to the <a href="https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/39731?show=full" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">cessation of arable farming</a> in the UK, for instance.</p><p>It may also reduce rainfall over the Amazon basin, impact the monsoon systems in Asia and, by bringing warm waters into the Southern Ocean, further destabilize ice in Antarctica and accelerate global sea level rise.</p>
The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation has a major effect on the climate. Praetorius (2018)
Is it Time to Declare a Climate Emergency?<p>At what stage, and at what rise in global temperatures, will these tipping points be reached? No one is entirely sure. It may take centuries, millennia or it could be imminent.</p><p>But as COVID-19 taught us, we need to prepare for the expected. We were aware of the risk of a pandemic. We also knew that we were not sufficiently prepared. But we didn't act in a meaningful manner. Thankfully, we have been able to fast-track the production of vaccines to combat COVID-19. But there is no vaccine for climate change once we have passed these tipping points.</p><p><a href="https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2021" target="_blank">We need to act now on our climate</a>. Act like these tipping points are imminent. And stop thinking of climate change as a slow-moving, long-term threat that enables us to kick the problem down the road and let future generations deal with it. We must take immediate action to reduce global warming and fulfill our commitments to the <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Paris Agreement</a>, and build resilience with these tipping points in mind.</p><p>We need to plan now to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, but we also need to plan for the impacts, such as the ability to feed everyone on the planet, develop plans to manage flood risk, as well as manage the social and geopolitical impacts of human migrations that will be a consequence of fight or flight decisions.</p><p>Breaching these tipping points would be cataclysmic and potentially far more devastating than COVID-19. Some may not enjoy hearing these messages, or consider them to be in the realm of science fiction. But if it injects a sense of urgency to make us respond to climate change like we have done to the pandemic, then we must talk more about what has happened before and will happen again.</p><p>Otherwise we will continue playing Jenga with our planet. And ultimately, there will only be one loser – us.</p>
By John R. Platt
The period of the 45th presidency will go down as dark days for the United States — not just for the violent insurgency and impeachment that capped off Donald Trump's four years in office, but for every regressive action that came before.
- Biden Announces $2 Trillion Climate and Green Recovery Plan ... ›
- How Biden and Kerry Can Rebuild America's Climate Leadership ... ›
- Biden's EPA Pick Michael Regan Urged to Address Environmental ... ›
- How Joe Biden's Climate Plan Compares to the Green New Deal ... ›