EcoWatch
Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k Subscribe Subscribe
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Renewables
  • Culture
  • Science
  • Go Solar Today
      • Top Companies By State
        • California Solar Companies
        • Texas Solar Companies
        • New York Solar Companies
        • Florida Solar Companies
        • See All States
      • Top Incentives By State
        • California Solar Incentives
        • Texas Solar Incentives
        • New York Solar Incentives
        • Florida Solar Incentives
        • See All States
      • Solar Panel Costs By State
        • Solar Panel Costs in California
        • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
        • Solar Panel Costs in New York
        • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
        • See All States
      • Value of Solar by State
        • Is Solar Worth It In California?
        • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
        • Is Solar Worth It New York?
        • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
        • See All States
      • Company Reviews
        • Tesla Solar Review
        • Sunrun Solar Review
        • SunPower Solar Review
        • Vivint Solar Review
        • See All Companies
      • Common Solar Questions
        • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
        • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
        • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
        • Can You Finance Solar?
        • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
        • Payback On Solar Panels?
      • Solar Resources
        • Interactive Solar Calculator
        • Federal Solar Tax Credit 2023
        • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
        • Tesla Solar Roof Review
        • Cheapest Solar Panels
      • Companies Compared
        • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs SunPower
        • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
        • SunPower vs ADT Solar
EcoWatch
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Renewables
  • Culture
  • Science
  • Go Solar Today
    • Go Solar Today
    • Top Companies By State
      • California Solar Companies
      • Texas Solar Companies
      • New York Solar Companies
      • Florida Solar Companies
      • See All States
    • Top Incentives By State
      • California Solar Incentives
      • Texas Solar Incentives
      • New York Solar Incentives
      • Florida Solar Incentives
      • See All States
    • Solar Panel Costs By State
      • Solar Panel Costs in California
      • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
      • Solar Panel Costs in New York
      • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
      • See All States
    • Value of Solar by State
      • Is Solar Worth It In California?
      • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
      • Is Solar Worth It New York?
      • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
      • See All States
    • Company Reviews
      • Tesla Solar Review
      • Sunrun Solar Review
      • SunPower Solar Review
      • Vivint Solar Review
      • See All Companies
    • Common Solar Questions
      • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
      • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
      • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
      • Can You Finance Solar?
      • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
      • Payback On Solar Panels?
    • Solar Resources
      • Interactive Solar Calculator
      • Federal Solar Tax Credit 2023
      • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
      • Tesla Solar Roof Review
      • Cheapest Solar Panels
    • Companies Compared
      • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs SunPower
      • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
      • SunPower vs ADT Solar

The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k
    EcoWatch
    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k
    Home Business

    Corporate So-Called Climate Leaders Rely on ‘Greenwashed’ Net Zero Plans, Report Finds

    By: Olivia Rosane
    Updated: February 14, 2023
    Edited by Chris McDermott
    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon
    A Walmart store with solar panels on the roof in Northern California
    A Walmart store with solar panels on the roof in Northern California. Walmart is one of 15 major companies with a low or very low integrity climate plan. Steve Proehl / Getty Images
    Why you can trust us

    Founded in 2005 as an Ohio-based environmental newspaper, EcoWatch is a digital platform dedicated to publishing quality, science-based content on environmental issues, causes, and solutions.

    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

    In order to limit global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, and avoid the worst impacts of the climate crisis, we need to lower greenhouse gas emissions by 43 percent by 2030. Yet the climate plans of 24 major companies that paint themselves as environmental leaders would only see their supply chain emissions fall by 15 percent by that date, or 21 percent at the most generous interpretation of their plans.

    That’s one key finding from New Climate Institute and Carbon Market Watch’s second annual Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor, released Monday.

    “In this critical decade for climate action, companies’ current plans do not reflect the necessary urgency for emission reductions,” report co-author Thomas Day of NewClimate Institute said in a press release. “Regulators, voluntary initiatives and companies must place a renewed and urgent focus on the integrity of companies’ emission reduction plans up to 2030. The discourse on longer-term net zero should not distract from the immediate task at hand.”

    2/ The 24 companies assessed in this report are major multinationals contributing to approx. 4% of global #GHG emissions. They are prominently highlighting their climate leadership credentials but demonstrating a general lack of progress since the CCRM 2022.

    — NewClimate Institute (@newclimateinst) February 13, 2023

    The 24 multinational corporations assessed in the report together contributed around four percent of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2019. They include shipping giant Maersk, food or beverage companies like PepsiCo and Nestlé, retailers like H&M Group and Fast Retailing (Uniqlo) and tech companies like Apple, Google and Microsoft. All of these companies have pledged themselves to curbing their emissions in line with limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees as part of an initiative affiliated with the UN-backed Race to Zero campaign. 

    However, the analysis revealed that many of them are in fact dragging their feet. Of the 24 companies, 15 of them had climate strategies that the report considered to be low or very low integrity. 

    More From EcoWatch
    • Are Solar Panels Worth It for Your Home? (2023 Buyer’s Guide)
    • A Brief History of Solar Energy
    • How to Lower Your Energy Bill

    “At a time when corporations need to come clean about their climate impact and shrink their carbon footprint, many are exploiting vague and misleading ‘net zero’ pledges to greenwash their brand while continuing with business as usual,” Carbon Market Watch’s Executive Director Sabine Frank said, as The Wall Street Journal reported.

    The report found three major problems with corporate climate plans:

    1. Missing the deadline: While 22 companies had set 2030 targets, these targets were not nearly ambitious enough to match the emissions reductions needed by that date. This was partly because many of the near-term targets only focused on emissions from the companies’ direct activities or energy sourcing, otherwise known as scope 1 and 2 emissions. This excludes all indirect, or scope 3 emissions, such as emissions from the use of a company’s product. But these emissions made up more than 90 percent of most companies’ footprints. 
    2. Shallow Pledges: Many of the companies’ net zero pledges were ambiguous and not actually in line with “deep decarbonization.” Only five companies — H&M Group, Holcim, Stellantis, Maersk, and Thyssenkrupp — actually had plans to cut emissions by at least 90 percent by their net-zero target date. In total, all 24 plans would only see the companies’ combined emissions fall by 36 percent by the so-called net-zero deadline. 
    3. Offending Offsets: Many of the companies’ plans still relied too heavily on carbon offsets, which have been repeatedly shown to be unreliable. At least 75 percent of the companies relied on offsets based on preserving forests or other natural carbon sinks. However, by their living nature, these projects can’t guarantee long term carbon storage, and sufficiently canceling out emissions this way would require two to four planet Earths if other companies were to follow suit. 

    “By making such outlandish carbon neutrality claims, these corporations are not only misleading consumers and investors, but they are also exposing themselves to increasing legal and reputational liability,” policy expert on carbon markets at Carbon Market Watch Lindsay Otis said in the press release. “Instead, they should implement ambitious climate plans to reduce their own emissions, while financing action outside of their own activities, without claiming that this makes them carbon neutral.”

    5/ #Offsetting practices remain a key concern: They undermine targets and mislead consumers. Half of the companies we assessed make carbon neutrality claims today, but these claims only cover 3% of those companies’ emissions on average.🚩
    To the report: https://t.co/cfWrOzSrDJ pic.twitter.com/TkpJZXwJSB

    — NewClimate Institute (@newclimateinst) February 13, 2023

    On an individual basis, Maersk came out the best with a plan of “reasonable integrity,” helped along in part by its investments in alternative fuels and ships. On the other side of the spectrum, American Airlines, Samsung, Carrefour, Deutsche Post DHL, Fast Retailing (Uniqlo), Inditex (Zara), Nestlé, PepsiCo, Volkswagen and Walmart all had plans of low or very low integrity. 

    In response to the report, Nestlé defended its climate plans, saying it had used the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) standard. 

    “There is clearly disagreement between these two expert organizations (New Climate Institute (NCI) and the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi)), with regard to the approach companies should take toward achieving net zero emissions,” the company wrote in a statement. “This is problematic since, given the enormity and urgency of addressing climate change, companies need clear, common guidance on which to base their approach.” The report does offer some guidance on what companies should do, according to The Wall Street Journal. In addition to making sure that their net-zero plans do cover at least 90 percent of total emissions, they can also do their best to calculate and disclose scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, help their suppliers become more sustainable and make sure that they are using 24/7 renewable energy.

    Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

      By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy & to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

      Olivia Rosane

      Olivia Rosane is a freelance writer and reporter with a decade’s worth of experience. She has been contributing to EcoWatch daily since 2018 and has also covered environmental themes for Treehugger, The Trouble, YES! Magazine and Real Life. She holds a Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Cambridge and a master’s in Art and Politics from Goldsmiths, University of London.
      Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

      Read More

      Global Freshwater Demand Will Exceed Supply 40% by 2030, Experts Warn
      Samuel Taylor Coleridge first published the poem “The Rime of
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
      Train Derails, Leaks an Estimated 5,000 Gallons of Fuel on Reservation in Washington
      Another train has derailed, this time on the Swinomish Reservation
      By Paige Bennett
      Two Aging UK Coal Plants to Shutter in March Despite Government Requests to Remain on Standby
      Two aging UK coal plants will close at the end
      By Olivia Rosane

      Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

        By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy & to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

        Latest Articles

        • Arctic Sea Ice Maximum Extent Is Fifth Lowest on Record
          by Olivia Rosane
          March 17, 2023
        • Global Freshwater Demand Will Exceed Supply 40% by 2030, Experts Warn
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          March 17, 2023
        • Train Derails, Leaks an Estimated 5,000 Gallons of Fuel on Reservation in Washington
          by Paige Bennett
          March 17, 2023
        • Forest Recovery Can Offset Some Tropical Deforestation Emissions, But Not All
          by Olivia Rosane
          March 17, 2023
        • Two Aging UK Coal Plants to Shutter in March Despite Government Requests to Remain on Standby
          by Olivia Rosane
          March 17, 2023
        • Meet Europe’s Latest National Park, A Wild River in the Heart of Albania
          by Olivia Rosane
          March 17, 2023
        • Volkswagen Announces Plans for a More Affordable Electric Car
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          March 16, 2023
        • Property Values of Homes Near Solar Farms Appraised in New Study
          by Paige Bennett
          March 16, 2023
        EcoWatch

        The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

          • Climate Climate
          • Animals Animals
          • Health + Wellness Health + Wellness
          • Insights + Opinion Insights + Opinion
          • Adventure Adventure
          • Oceans Oceans
          • Business Business
          • Solar Solar
          • About EcoWatch
          • Contact EcoWatch
          • EcoWatch Reviews
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy Policy
          • Learn About Solar Energy
          • Learn About Deregulated Energy
          • EcoWatch UK
          Follow Us
          Facebook 573k
          Twitter 238k
          Instagram 37k
          Subscribe Subscribe

          Experts for a healthier planet and life.

          Mentioned by:
          Learn more