The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Colbert: I Woke Up Yesterday Morning and My Tesla Could Drive Itself
Colbert loves his Tesla and calls it part of his contribution to fighting global warming. But last night on the show, he talked about a new update for the Tesla Model S: autopilot. The feature "essentially allows you to do semi-autonomous driving when you're behind the wheel," says a CNBC reporter in the Late Show segment.
He talks about how it's not just car companies competing to make the first fully autonomous self-driving car. "It seems like every billionaire with a tech company [think: Tesla, Apple and Google] is working on a self-driving car," jokes Colbert.
"This technology is self-driving towards us whether we like it or not," says Colbert. But he, for one, is all for it.
Find out why here:
Colbert is not the only one who loves his Tesla, though. Paul Sasso turned his Tesla into what he calls the "Bern Machine" and he's been touring the country in it as "part of a fundraising—and awareness-raising—campaign" on behalf of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. Sasso says on his Twitter page, "for every new photo of the Bern Machine posted to
#BernMachineChallenge, I will donate $1 to Bernie's campaign."
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Low-Fat Diets Rich in Fruits and Veggies May Reduce Women’s Risk of Breast Cancer Death, Study Finds
Colorado senator and 2020 hopeful Michael Bennet introduced his plan to combat climate change Monday, in the first major policy rollout of his campaign. Bennet's plan calls for the establishment of a "Climate Bank," using $1 trillion in federal spending to "catalyze" $10 trillion in private spending for the U.S. to transition entirely to net-zero emissions by 2050.
When Trump's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its replacement for the Obama-era Clean Power Plan in August 2018, its own estimates said the reduced regulations could lead to 1,400 early deaths a year from air pollution by 2030.
Now, the EPA wants to change the way it calculates the risks posed by particulate matter pollution, using a model that would lower the death toll from the new plan, The New York Times reported Monday. Five current or former EPA officials familiar with the plan told The Times that the new method would assume there is no significant health gain by lowering air pollution levels below the legal limit. However, many public health experts say that there is no safe level of particulate matter exposure, which has long been linked to heart and lung disease.