Coalition Denounces Legislation That Would Pave Way for Fracking in Illinois


Americans Against Fracking

Following the introduction of a bill that would, in effect, serve as a road map for introducing hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” to the state, 15 Illinois-based and national organizations and individuals—including Illinois People’s Action, Food & Water Watch, Southern Illinoisans Against Fracturing our Environment (SAFE), 350.org, Breast Cancer Action and Americans Against Fracking advisory board members Mark Ruffalo, Sandra Steingraber and Josh Fox—urged Governor Pat Quinn and the Illinois General Assembly to reconsider the legislation. In a letter to the lawmakers, the groups outlined how HB 2615 would ultimately expose Illinois residents to the widely documented public health, economic and environmental problems associated with fracking.

More than 50 people gathered in Springfield, Illinois today to deliver more than 600 petitions against the fracking bill to Governor Pat Quinn. Grassroots leaders asked the Governor's staff to protect their communities and oppose the bill. Photo by Jessica Fujan

“This bill is anything but a regulation bill,” says Illinois People’s Action (IPA) leader Mary Bechtel. “It’s really a de-regulation bill. It’s full steam ahead for big energy companies to exploit our state for their own profits, and we’re going to fight to protect our air, water, health and farmland. New York Governor Cuomo just extended his state’s moratorium on fracking because the science is still unclear.  Is science different in Illinois?  We need a moratorium here too.” IPA is demanding Quinn kill the bill and work for a ban on fracking.

Public backlash against fracking has escalated in recent years as more than 300 U.S. communities have taken action against the process. States such as New York, New Jersey and Maryland have taken more measured approaches when considering whether to allow the process, including soliciting input from the public and studying health impacts, steps that Illinois policymakers failed to consider when brokering the terms of HB 2615.

“The people of Illinois are no less deserving of protections than those of New York and Maryland, where caution is the responsible way to approach the raft of unstudied health problems related to hydrofracking,” said Americans Against Fracking advisory boardmember Mark Ruffalo. “We need to fight to protect Illinois from the impacts of fracking and the raft of mysterious health problems we see arising in states where caution has been thrown to the wind. We call on the leadership of Governor Quinn and the Illinois legislature to follow New York’s lead and wait to drill after health studies have been done. HB 2615 is rash, irresponsible and shortsighted.”

The groups opposing HB 2615 consider the bill ill timed and inadequate. High volume fracking is not currently occurring in Illinois and organizations signed on to the letter urged lawmakers to keep it that way. The letter points out, however, that even as a regulation bill, HB 2615 is grossly inadequate in that, among other things, it:

  • Fails to fully disclose to the public information about the chemicals used in fracking
  • Allows fracking operations to set up just 500 feet from water wells, homes, churches, schools, hospitals and nursing homes
  • Allows fracking just 300 feet from “the ordinary high water mark of any river, perennial stream, natural or artificial lake, pond or reservoir.”
  • Fails to provide for local control by county government over whether fracking can occur in its jurisdiction
  • Endangers water supplies by only sampling and testing water near drilling sites up to 30 months after drilling and fracking, despite the fact that the risk of underground contamination associated with these activities can persist for years.

“The oil and gas industry is zeroing in on our communities, despite the objections of many concerned citizens and entire communities,” said Vito A. Mastrangelo of SAFE. “SAFE plans to increase the pressure on our elected officials. We intend to ensure that fracking does not come to our communities—not provide a road map to frack them.”

The detrimental effects of fracking are numerous and well documented. Extracting, transporting and burning natural gas all contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and worsen global climate change. In addition to the carbon dioxide emitted from burning natural gas, significant amounts of methane leak as new wells are fracked and as natural gas is transported. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, about 33 times more efficient at trapping heat than carbon dioxide over 100 years, and about 70 to 100 times more potent than carbon dioxide over 20 years according to a 2009 study published in the magazine Science. Moreover, more than 1,000 cases of water contamination have been documented near fracking and drilling sites in the U.S.

“Fracking not only pollutes our air and water, it also exacerbates climate change and threatens public health,” said Food & Water Watch midwest region director Emily Carroll. “Illinoisans do not need half measures that open our state to this dangerous process. Governor Quinn and the legislature should take a step back, take a second look at the facts about fracking, and take immediate action to make sure that not a single well is drilled in Illinois.”

As for the public health effects of drilling and fracking, the process has been linked to increased ground level ozone pollution, greater instances of asthma and the discharge of volatile organic compounds into the atmosphere. A 2012 study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science found that, when compared to those who live further away, people living within half a mile of fracking operations face significantly higher cancer risks, as well as a greater chance of other health problems connected to pollution.

“Chemicals used in the fracking process include known carcinogens and endocrine disruptors that can leach into wells and aquifers and mix with drinking water in nearby communities as well as far-off cities,” noted Breast Cancer Action policy and campaigns coordinator Annie Sartor.

“A growing body of evidence demonstrates the connection between toxic chemicals used in the fracking process to increased risk of many health harms, including breast cancer. It is the role of our elected leaders to protect us from toxic chemicals that may increase risk of developing disease, and Illinois legislators must put public health first by rejecting HB 2615, instituting an immediate moratorium on fracking and taking steps to ensure that fracking never comes to Illinois,” she concluded.

Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.


Sign the petition today, telling President Obama to enact an immediate fracking moratorium:


EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

Aerial assessment of Hurricane Sandy damage in Connecticut. Dannel Malloy / Flickr / CC BY 2.0

Extreme weather events supercharged by climate change in 2012 led to nearly 1,000 more deaths, more than 20,000 additional hospitalizations, and cost the U.S. healthcare system $10 billion, a new report finds.

Read More Show Less
Giant sequoia trees at Sequoia National Park, California. lucky-photographer / iStock / Getty Images Plus

A Bay Area conservation group struck a deal to buy and to protect the world's largest remaining privately owned sequoia forest for $15.6 million. Now it needs to raise the money, according to CNN.

Read More Show Less
This aerial view shows the Ogasayama Sports Park Ecopa Stadium, one of the venues for 2019 Rugby World Cup. MARTIN BUREAU / AFP / Getty Images

The Rugby World Cup starts Friday in Japan where Pacific Island teams from Samoa, Fiji and Tonga will face off against teams from industrialized nations. However, a new report from a UK-based NGO says that when the teams gather for the opening ceremony on Friday night and listen to the theme song "World In Union," the hypocrisy of climate injustice will take center stage.

Read More Show Less
Vera_Petrunina / iStock / Getty Images Plus

By Wudan Yan

In June, New York Times journalist Andy Newman wrote an article titled, "If seeing the world helps ruin it, should we stay home?" In it, he raised the question of whether or not travel by plane, boat, or car—all of which contribute to climate change, rising sea levels, and melting glaciers—might pose a moral challenge to the responsibility that each of us has to not exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of climate change. The premise of Newman's piece rests on his assertion that traveling "somewhere far away… is the biggest single action a private citizen can take to worsen climate change."

Read More Show Less
Volunteer caucasian woman giving grain to starving African children. Bartosz Hadyniak / E+ / Getty Images

By Frances Moore Lappé

Food will be scarce, expensive and less nutritious," CNN warns us in its coverage of the UN's new "Climate Change and Land" report. The New York Times announces that "Climate Change Threatens the World's Food Supply."

Read More Show Less
British Airways 757. Jon Osborne / Flickr / CC BY-SA 2.0

By Adam Vaughan

Two-thirds of people in the UK think the amount people fly should be reined in to tackle climate change, polling has found.

Read More Show Less
Climate Week NYC

On Monday, Sept. 23, the Climate Group will kick off its 11th annual Climate Week NYC, a chance for governments, non-profits, businesses, communities and individuals to share possible solutions to the climate crisis while world leaders gather in the city for the UN Climate Action Summit.

Read More Show Less

By Pam Radtke Russell in New Orleans

Local TV weather forecasters have become foot soldiers in the war against climate misinformation. Over the past decade, a growing number of meteorologists and weathercasters have begun addressing the climate crisis either as part of their weather forecasts, or in separate, independent news reports to help their viewers understand what is happening and why it is important.

Read More Show Less