Climate Flip-Flopper Marco Rubio Announces Presidential Candidacy
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio once acknowledged that climate change was a serious issue that needed to be addressed. But now he's thrown his hat in the ring for the Republican presidential nomination, a field in which such science-based beliefs are taboo. So now he's a full-blown climate denier, spouting the GOP party line.
Photo credit: Shutterstock
It's been no secret for the last couple of years that Rubio had his eye on the White House. He was tapped by his party to do the response to President Obama's State of the Union address in January 2013. So by last year, when he was asked by interviewer Jonathan Karl on ABC's This Week, "You do not think that human activity, the production of CO2, has caused warming to our planet?" he responded with Tea Party talking points: "I do not believe that human activity is causing these dramatic changes to our climate the way these scientists are portraying it, and I do not believe that the laws that they propose we pass will do anything about it, except it will destroy our economy."
When Karl asked him "How big a threat is climate change?" Rubio said, "I don't agree with the notion that some are putting out there, including scientists, that somehow, there are actions we can take today that would actually have an impact on what's happening in our climate. Our climate is always changing. And what they have chosen to do is take a handful of decades of research and—and say that this is now evidence of a longer-term trend that's directly and almost solely attributable to manmade activity."
"I don't know of any era in world history where the climate has been stable," Rubio continued. "Climate is always evolving and natural disasters have always existed. But I do believe that the fact is, that these events that we're talking about are impacting us, because we've built very expensive structures in Florida and other parts of the country near areas that are prone to hurricanes. We've had hurricanes in Florida forever. I have no problem with taking mitigation activity. What I have a problem with is these changes to our law that somehow politicians say are going to change our weather. That's absurd."
In that interview, the 42-year-old U.S. senator asserted that he was ready to be president. But it was the 35-year-old state legislator Rubio who sounded more prepared. Those who only know the Rubio of today, who is just debuting on the national stage, would not have recognized the young legislator who spoke to the Florida House of Representatives back in 2007.
In touting energy independence, he appeared to accept climate change and taking action on climate as a given not to be argued with, as he promoted the potential for Florida to be a new energy leader.
"Another opportunity before us is to serve as an international model for energy efficiency and independence," he said. "On the issue of energy, global warming, dependence on foreign sources of fuel and capitalism have come together to create opportunities for us that were unimaginable just a few short years ago. Today Florida has the opportunity to pursue bold energy policies, not just because they're good for the environment but because people can actually make money doing them. This nation, and ultimately the world, is headed towards emission caps and energy diversification. Those changes will require technological advances that make those measures cost effective. The demand for such advances will create an industry to meet it. Florida should become the Silicon Valley of that industry."
Some political observers have suggested that Rubio could bring Hispanic voters to the GOP in 2016 because he himself is Cuban-American, despite the fact that those of Cuban descent represent less than four percent of American Hispanics and there is another Cuban-American, Ted Cruz, already in the race. But polling suggests that Rubio's positions on the environment are way out of line with a majority of American Hispanics.
A 2014 poll conducted for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) by Latino Decisions found that nine out of 10 Latino voters want the government to take action on climate change, 8 in 10 want President Obama to take action against carbon emissions and 86 percent support setting limits on carbon emissions from power plants, an action Obama took with his Clean Power Plant rule last summer. Rubio is opposed to that rule. In each case, a majority of Latino Republicans polls agreed with government action on climate change and environmental pollution.
“Of the issues we’ve polled, the only other national issue Latinos feel more intensely about is immigration reform,” said Matt Barreto, co-founder of Latino Decisions and associate professor of political science at the University of Washington. “Action on climate change is a very high priority for Latinos—regardless of age, income, party affiliation or where they live. This is a clear message for public officials who want support from Latinos: protecting the environment is a top priority. If you want their support, taking action on climate change is an important place to start.”
"Latinos intensely support taking action on climate change and fighting air pollution,” said NRDC senior attorney Adrianna Quintero, senior attorney for NRDC. “Latinos in the U.S. recognize the threat that climate change poses to the well being of our families and the future of our community in this country and abroad, and want our leaders to solve it. Latinos have a deep sense of interconnectedness, not only to family and friends we see every day but to our cousins, aunts and grandparents, whether they live in the United States or abroad. That powerful sense of community extends to concerns for others. Fighting climate change is part of our obligation to build a more hopeful future, for all.”
Photo credit: Shutterstock
Rubio launched his campaign in his native Miami, one of the American cities more threatened by the effects of climate change including sea level rise, flooding and hurricanes.
NextGen Climate, which has launched its "Hot Seat" campaign to call out the deniers in what it's referring to as "The Koch Primaries," said, "Millions of Floridians are already threatened by sea level rise—including a disproportionate number of Latinos—and are experiencing the negative impact of climate change first-hand. Florida’s rising sea levels jeopardize the state’s communities, homes and drinking water—and threaten $3.5 trillion of assets in Rubio’s hometown of Miami alone. Even the Freedom Tower, the site of Rubio’s campaign launch, could be underwater by 2060. As Rubio begins his campaign and visits key states, NextGen Climate will continue to urge him to stand up for our kids and take action to address climate change once and for all."
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
By Robin Scher
Beyond the questions surrounding the availability, effectiveness and safety of a vaccine, the COVID-19 pandemic has led us to question where our food is coming from and whether we will have enough.
- Can Urban Farms Prevent Hunger in 54 Million People in the U.S. ... ›
- New Report Finds Malnutrition World's Top Killer Amid Pandemic ... ›
- Oxfam Warns 12,000 Could Die Per Day From Hunger Due to ... ›
- Three Ways to Support a Healthy Food System During the COVID ... ›
- Trump USDA Resumes Effort to Cut Food Stamp Benefits - EcoWatch ›
- Pandemic Threatens Food Security for Many College Students ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Tearing through the crowded streets of Philadelphia, an electric car and a gas-powered car sought to win a heated race. One that mimicked how cars are actually used. The cars had to stop at stoplights, wait for pedestrians to cross the street, and swerve in and out of the hundreds of horse-drawn buggies. That's right, horse-drawn buggies. Because this race took place in 1908. It wanted to settle once and for all which car was the superior urban vehicle. Although the gas-powered car was more powerful, the electric car was more versatile. As the cars passed over the finish line, the defeat was stunning. The 1908 Studebaker electric car won by 10 minutes. If in 1908, the electric car was clearly the better form of transportation, why don't we drive them now? Today, I'm going to answer that question by diving into the history of electric cars and what I discovered may surprise you.
As bitcoin's fortunes and prominence rise, so do concerns about its environmental impact.
- 15 Top Conservation Issues of 2021 Include Big Threats, Potential ... ›
- How Blockchain Could Boost Clean Energy - EcoWatch ›
By David Drake and Jeffrey York
The Research Brief is a short take about interesting academic work.
The Big Idea
People often point to plunging natural gas prices as the reason U.S. coal-fired power plants have been shutting down at a faster pace in recent years. However, new research shows two other forces had a much larger effect: federal regulation and a well-funded activist campaign that launched in 2011 with the goal of ending coal power.
- Major Milestone: More than 100,000 MW Worth of Coal-Fired Power ... ›
- Coal Will Not Bring Appalachia Back to Life, But Tech and ... ›
- Renewables Beat Coal in the U.S. for the First Time This April ... ›