The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Permafrost and Wetland Emissions Could Cut 1.5°C Carbon Budget ‘by Five Years’
By Robert McSweeney
These natural processes are "positive feedbacks"—so called because they release more greenhouse gases as global temperatures rise, thus reinforcing the warming. They have previously not been represented in carbon budget estimates as they are not included in most climate models, the researchers say.
The findings suggest that human-caused emissions will be need to be cut by an additional 20 percent in order to meet the Paris agreement's 1.5°C or 2°C limits, the researchers estimate.
'Engines for Turning CO2 Into Methane'
Over the last year or so, there has been a flurry of new carbon budget studies—using slightly different approaches to estimate how much CO2 we can emit and still hold global temperature rise to no more than 1.5°C or 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Carbon Brief summarized all the 1.5°C budgets in a recent analysis piece.
Many of these studies use global climate models to make their estimates. However, there are some processes which affect the climate that are not yet incorporated into these models.
The new study, published in Nature Geoscience, aims to fill that gap. It focuses on two processes on the land surface: thawing permafrost and natural wetlands.
These are both positive feedbacks for the climate because, as they respond to rising temperatures, they cause the release of more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Permafrost thawing causes disturbances to the soils. This photo was taken on Forsheim Peninsula, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada.A. Cassidy, UBC Geography / CC BY 2.0
These soils hold a huge amount of carbon, accumulated from dead plants and animals over thousands of years. Rising temperatures put this carbon at risk of being released, explained Dr. Chris Jones, head of the earth system and mitigation science team at the Met Office Hadley Centre. Jones is not an author on the new study, but his team was involved closely in the work. He told Carbon Brief:
"While [permafrost] is frozen, it is inert. As it thaws, this carbon is vulnerable to decomposition—like any other soil carbon. Depending on whether it is waterlogged or not this can be emitted to the atmosphere as CO2 or methane."
How much is released as CO2 and how much as methane is still uncertain, and is an active area of research. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas—approximately 26 times more powerful than CO2 at trapping heat in the atmosphere, although it only lasts for around a decade in the atmosphere.
In natural wetlands, plants absorb CO2 from the atmosphere as they grow. But, because they are waterlogged, when the plants decompose they release methane, rather than CO2. This makes wetlands "effectively engines for turning CO2 into methane," said Jones.
In the Amazon, for example, flooded forests actually release methane through the trees themselves.
Wetlands respond to a warming climate in three ways, Jones explained:
"As [the climate] warms, the local decomposition rate increases. Also, as rainfall changes, we may see increased or decreased areas of wetlands. This varies regionally and, again, is a large uncertainty across climate models. Finally, a direct effect of increased CO2 in the atmosphere is to increase the growth rate of the vegetation and, hence, increase the amount of CO2 being turned into methane."
The study is the first to bring all these factors together, he noted.
The researchers used a "multi-layered soil carbon model" called JULES (Joint UK Land Environment Simulator), explained lead author Dr. Edward Comyn-Platt, a land surface modeller at the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. JULES has an improved representation of soil chemistry and the way that wetlands create methane.
With permafrost, for example, "this not only improves our estimates of the carbon stored in soils at high latitudes, but also allows us to estimate how much of this soil will be lost as the permafrost regions thaw," Comyn-Platt told Carbon Brief.
To estimate carbon budgets, the researchers use an "inverted" form of the model. This means that rather than plugging in pathways of future greenhouse gas emissions and seeing how global temperatures respond, the researchers input pathways of global temperature rise and use the model to estimate the corresponding levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
The study looks at three scenarios of future global warming: holding temperature rise at 1.5°C and 2°C, and one where warming "overshoots" 1.5°C, reaches 1.75°C, then returns to 1.5°C.
In their "control" model runs with no permafrost or wetland feedbacks, the researchers estimate the 1.5°C budget at 720bn-929bn tonnes of CO2 from the beginning of 2018—equivalent to 20-25 years of emissions at current rates.
This is slightly higher than some recent budgets because the JULES model tends to simulate a large amount of carbon uptake from the land surface, explained Comyn-Platt, freeing up space for more CO2 emissions in the budget.
The researchers then used the model to simulate the response of permafrost and natural wetlands to climate change. When the additional CO2 and methane emissions are incorporated, the available carbon budget shrinks substantially—falling to 533bn-753bn tonnes of CO2 for 1.5°C, or 14-20 years of emissions.
That means accounting for the impacts of permafrost and wetlands takes around five years off the 1.5°C budget. And, as the table below shows, the budgets for the 1.5°C overshoot and 2°C scenarios are similarly reduced.
This "nice work" shows that even if we were to get net emissions to zero in the next few decades, emissions would need to fall further in order to stabilize temperatures at 1.5°C or 2°C, said Piers Forster, professor of physical climate change at the University of Leeds and director of the Priestley International Centre for Climate. He told Carbon Brief:
"The extra carbon released from thawing permafrost and warming wetlands would continue beyond the date of net-zero emissions and this would need to be countered for in order to consider carbon budgets applicable for 2100 and beyond."
The study also highlights the constant evolution in the complexity of climate models, said Jones, with new model components being developed and run separately before being incorporated into global models.
The graphic below shows how new components have been added to global climate models over time.
In this case, the wetland model "scheme" will be shortly be brought into UKESM1—the UK Earth System Model run by the Met Office Hadley Centre and partners, said Jones. And the permafrost scheme "will follow in due course."
Reposted with permission from our media associate Carbon Brief.
- Is There A Ticking Time Bomb Under The Arctic? ›
- The Arctic is full of toxic mercury, and climate change is going to ... ›
- Melting Permafrost | Weather Underground ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
‘Companies Should Not Be Allowed to Use Hazardous Ingredients in Products People Use’: Michelle Pfeiffer Speaks Up for Safer Cosmetics
The beauty products we put on our skin can have important consequences for our health. Just this March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned that some Claire's cosmetics had tested positive for asbestos. But the FDA could only issue a warning, not a recall, because current law does not empower the agency to do so.
Michelle Pfeiffer wants to change that.
The actress and Environmental Working Group (EWG) board member was spotted on Capitol Hill Thursday lobbying lawmakers on behalf of a bill that would increase oversight of the cosmetics industry, The Washington Post reported.
By Julia Conley
Scientists at the United Nations' intergovernmental body focusing on biodiversity sounded alarms earlier this month with its report on the looming potential extinction of one million species — but few heard their calls, according to a German newspaper report.
The climate crisis is a major concern for American voters with nearly 40 percent reporting the issue will help determine how they cast their ballots in the upcoming 2020 presidential election, according to a report compiled by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
Of more than 1,000 registered voters surveyed on global warming, climate and energy policies, as well as personal and collective action, 38 percent said that a candidate's position on climate change is "very important" when it comes to determining who will win their vote. Overall, democratic candidates are under more pressure to provide green solutions as part of their campaign promises with 64 percent of Democrat voters saying they prioritize the issue compared with just 34 percent of Independents and 12 percent of Republicans.
President Donald Trump has agreed to sign a $19.1 billion disaster relief bill that will help Americans still recovering from the flooding, hurricanes and wildfires that have devastated parts of the country in the past two years. Senate Republicans said they struck a deal with the president to approve the measure, despite the fact that it did not include the funding he wanted for the U.S.-Mexican border, CNN reported.
"The U.S. Senate has just approved a 19 Billion Dollar Disaster Relief Bill, with my total approval. Great!" the president tweeted Thursday.
"There was a lot of devastation throughout the state," Governor Mike Parson said at a Thursday morning press conference, as NPR reported. "We were very fortunate last night that we didn't have more injuries than what we had, and we didn't have more fatalities across the state. But three is too many."