Cancer-Causing Chemical in Shampoos Subject of Ground-Breaking Legal Agreement
The Center for Environmental Health (CEH) announced today it has reached first-ever legal agreements with 26 major companies to discontinue using the cancer-causing chemical cocamide DEA in shampoo and personal care products.
In August 2013, CEH brought lawsuits against companies selling products in California that contain cocamide DEA without a health warning, as required under Prop 65, the state’s consumer protection law for toxic chemicals. In June 2012, the stated listed the chemical as a known carcinogen based on the assessment by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which evaluated skin exposure tests on animals. Cocamide DEA is a synthetic chemical created from a chemical reaction between coconut oils and diethanolamine. It has been used for decades in shampoos and other products as a foaming agent.
On May 2, CEH legal settlements with 14 companies were finalized in Alameda County Superior Court. Under the agreement, the companies agreed to stop using cocamide DEA in their products. While the litigation is binding only in the state of California, it is expected that the companies will stop selling products containing the chemical nationwide. The 14 companies are:
Ampro Industries, Inc.
Accessory Zone, LLC
Avlon Industries, Inc.
House of Cheatham, Inc.
Lush Handmade Cosmetics Ltd.
McBride Research Labs, Inc.
Michel Design Works Ltd.
Person & Covey, Inc.
Pharmaca Integrative Pharmacy, Inc.
Somerset Toiletry Company, Ltd.
Todd Christopher International, Inc. dba Vogue International
Trans-India Products, Inc. dba Shikai Products
CEH has signed agreements with 12 other companies, which are expected to be approved by the court in June. The 12 companies are:
Farouk Systems, Inc.
Fisk Industries, Inc.
Golden Sun, dba Newhall Labs, Inc.
Grandall Distributing Co, Inc.
Grisi Hnos., S.A. de C.V.
Hoyu America Transition Co.
Imperial Dax Company, Inc.
Mudlark Papers, Inc.
Skinfood USA, Inc.
Olympic Mountain and Marine Products, Inc.
Walgreen Co. and its subsidiary Drugstore.com, Inc.
There are ongoing cases pending against more than 100 other companies.
“These legal settlements are a great victory for children’s and families’ health. Simply put, there is no reason why anyone should be lathering a cancer-causing chemical into their hair or their children’s hair,” said CEH Research Director Caroline Cox. “This is also a victory for California’s Prop 65 consumer protection law, which promotes safer products and insures our right to know when common products pose serious health threats.”
Despite these legal settlements, some companies continue to sell unlabeled products containing the carcinogen. In April, CEH bought children’s bubble bath products containing cocamide DEA from Dollar General stores, almost six months after CEH notified Dollar General that it was in violation of California law.
Items containing cocamide DEA that CEH purchased recently from Dollar General. Photo credit: CEH
“It’s absolutely crazy that federal law allows cosmetics companies to use chemicals linked to cancer in shampoos, lotions and makeup,” said Janet Nudelman, director of program and policy at the Breast Cancer Fund and director of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. “Kudos to California and the Center for Environmental Health for taking action to get companies to stop using cocamide DEA. Now it’s the job of Congress to give the $71 billion beauty industry the makeover it needs by setting regulations that protect human health.”
In their new report, Safer Suds: Eliminating a Cancer-Causing Chemical in Shampoos and Soaps, CEH and the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics are urging Congress to adopt federal legislation for safer personal care products—the Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013.
The cosmetics industry is virtually self-regulated. Decisions about ingredient safety are left up to the cosmetics industry. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cannot require these companies to conduct safety assessments before using chemicals nor can it require product recalls. The Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013 would require:
A phase-out of ingredients linked to cancer, birth defects and developmental harm
Creation of a health-based safety standard that includes protections for children, the elderly, workers and other vulnerable populations
Elimination of labeling loopholes by requiring full ingredient disclosure on product labels and company websites, including salon products and the constituent ingredients of fragrance
Worker access to information about unsafe chemicals in personal care products
Data-sharing to avoid duplicative testing and encourage the development of alternatives to animal testing
Adequate funding so the FDA has the resources it needs to more effectively regulate the cosmetics industry
The two groups recommend the following steps to avoid cocamide DEA in the products you use:
Carefully read labels on your soaps, shampoos and other similar products. Don’t buy products that list cocamide DEA as an ingredient. While companies are removing this chemical from their products, there are still old products on store shelves.
Check out the Think Dirty® app to learn more about the potentially toxic ingredients in your cosmetics and personal care products. Don’t buy products that list those ingredients.
Tell Dollar General to stop selling products that contain cocamide DEA.
Ask your Representative to co-sponsor and support the Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013. Congress needs to know that this issue is important to consumers
YOU ALSO MIGHT LIKE
- Redwoods are the world's tallest trees.
- Now scientists have discovered they are even bigger than we thought.
- Using laser technology they map the 80-meter giants.
- Trees are a key plank in the fight against climate change.
They are among the largest trees in the world, descendants of forests where dinosaurs roamed.
Pixabay / Simi Luft<p><span>Until recently, measuring these trees meant scaling their 80 meter high trunks with a tape measure. Now, a team of scientists from University College London and the University of Maryland uses advanced laser scanning, to create 3D maps and calculate the total mass.</span></p><p>The results are striking: suggesting the trees <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73733-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">may be as much as 30% larger than earlier measurements suggested.</a> Part of that could be due to the additional trunks the Redwoods can grow as they age, <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73733-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a process known as reiteration</a>.</p>
New 3D measurements of large redwood trees for biomass and structure. Nature / UCL<p>Measuring the trees more accurately is important because carbon capture will probably play a key role in the battle against climate change. Forest <a href="https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/09/carbon-sequestration-natural-forest-regrowth" target="_blank">growth could absorb billions of tons</a> of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year.</p><p>"The importance of big trees is widely-recognised in terms of carbon storage, demographics and impact on their surrounding ecosystems," the authors wrote<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73733-6" target="_blank"> in the journal Nature</a>. "Unfortunately the importance of big trees is in direct proportion to the difficulty of measuring them."</p><p>Redwoods are so long lived because of their ability to <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73733-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">cope with climate change, resist disease and even survive fire damage</a>, the scientists say. Almost a fifth of their volume may be bark, which helps protect them.</p>
Carbon Capture Champions<p><span>Earlier research by scientists at Humboldt University and the University of Washington found that </span><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716302584" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Redwood forests store almost 2,600 tonnes of carbon per hectare</a><span>, their bark alone containing more carbon than any other neighboring species.</span></p><p>While the importance of trees in fighting climate change is widely accepted, not all species enjoy the same protection as California's coastal Redwoods. In 2019 the world lost the equivalent of <a href="https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/deforestation-and-forest-degradation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">30 soccer fields of forest cover every minute</a>, due to agricultural expansion, logging and fires, according to The Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF).</p>
Pixabay<p>Although <a href="https://c402277.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/publications/1420/files/original/Deforestation_fronts_-_drivers_and_responses_in_a_changing_world_-_full_report_%281%29.pdf?1610810475" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the rate of loss is reported to have slowed in recent years</a>, reforesting the world to help stem climate change is a massive task.</p><p><span>That's why the World Economic Forum launched the Trillion Trees Challenge (</span><a href="https://www.1t.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">1t.org</a><span>) and is engaging organizations and individuals across the globe through its </span><a href="https://uplink.weforum.org/uplink/s/uplink-issue/a002o00000vOf09AAC/trillion-trees" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Uplink innovation crowdsourcing platform</a><span> to support the project.</span></p><p>That's backed up by research led by ETH Zurich/Crowther Lab showing there's potential to restore tree coverage across 2.2 billion acres of degraded land.</p><p>"Forests are critical to the health of the planet," according to <a href="https://www.1t.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">1t.org</a>. "They sequester carbon, regulate global temperatures and freshwater flows, recharge groundwater, anchor fertile soil and act as flood barriers."</p><p><em data-redactor-tag="em" data-verified="redactor">Reposted with permission from the </em><span><em data-redactor-tag="em" data-verified="redactor"><a href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/03/redwoods-store-more-co2-and-are-more-enormous-than-we-thought/" target="_blank">World Economic Forum</a>.</em></span></p>
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
- Offshore Wind Power Is Ready to Boom. Here's What That Means for ... ›
- American Skyscrapers Kill an Estimated 600 Million Migratory Birds ... ›
Kentucky is coping with historic flooding after a weekend of record-breaking rainfall, enduring water rescues, evacuations and emergency declarations.
<div id="0f31c" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="4290ab3e7ec4e142f8bce774bab39f03"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1366307788155219969" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Just got back from my office... downtown Beattyville Kentucky is not a pretty sight. @KySportsRadio… https://t.co/6nXwyMKtRb</div> — Tom Jones (@Tom Jones)<a href="https://twitter.com/8atticus/statuses/1366307788155219969">1614588136.0</a></blockquote></div>
<div class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="b41a2da6bf23cc19a5f38c2dc6c5f9fc"><div class="fb-post" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/dekalbtnfire/photos/a.924258171004562/3713119618785056/"></div></div>
Spring is coming. And soon, tree swallows will start building nests. But as the climate changes, the birds are nesting earlier in the spring.
- Spring Is Arriving Earlier Across the U.S. - EcoWatch ›
- Climate Change Leading to Fatal Bird Conflicts - EcoWatch ›
- The Unsettling Reason Why We're Seeing More Snowy Owls ... ›
Citigroup will strive to reach net-zero greenhouse gas pollution across its lending portfolio by 2050 and in its own operations by 2030, the investment group announced Monday.
- 20 Attorneys General Launch Climate Fraud Investigation of Exxon ... ›
- Exxon Plans to Increase Its Climate Pollution - EcoWatch ›
- Exxon to Slash 14,000 Jobs Worldwide as Oil Demand Drops ... ›