EcoWatch
Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k Subscribe Subscribe
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Renewables
  • Culture
  • Science
  • Go Solar Today
      • Top Companies By State
        • California Solar Companies
        • Texas Solar Companies
        • New York Solar Companies
        • Florida Solar Companies
        • See All States
      • Top Incentives By State
        • California Solar Incentives
        • Texas Solar Incentives
        • New York Solar Incentives
        • Florida Solar Incentives
        • See All States
      • Solar Panel Costs By State
        • Solar Panel Costs in California
        • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
        • Solar Panel Costs in New York
        • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
        • See All States
      • Value of Solar by State
        • Is Solar Worth It In California?
        • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
        • Is Solar Worth It New York?
        • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
        • See All States
      • Company Reviews
        • Tesla Solar Review
        • Sunrun Solar Review
        • SunPower Solar Review
        • Vivint Solar Review
        • See All Companies
      • Common Solar Questions
        • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
        • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
        • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
        • Can You Finance Solar?
        • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
        • Payback On Solar Panels?
      • Solar Resources
        • Interactive Solar Calculator
        • Federal Solar Tax Credit 2023
        • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
        • Tesla Solar Roof Review
        • Cheapest Solar Panels
      • Companies Compared
        • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs SunPower
        • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
        • SunPower vs ADT Solar
EcoWatch
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Renewables
  • Culture
  • Science
  • Go Solar Today
    • Go Solar Today
    • Top Companies By State
      • California Solar Companies
      • Texas Solar Companies
      • New York Solar Companies
      • Florida Solar Companies
      • See All States
    • Top Incentives By State
      • California Solar Incentives
      • Texas Solar Incentives
      • New York Solar Incentives
      • Florida Solar Incentives
      • See All States
    • Solar Panel Costs By State
      • Solar Panel Costs in California
      • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
      • Solar Panel Costs in New York
      • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
      • See All States
    • Value of Solar by State
      • Is Solar Worth It In California?
      • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
      • Is Solar Worth It New York?
      • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
      • See All States
    • Company Reviews
      • Tesla Solar Review
      • Sunrun Solar Review
      • SunPower Solar Review
      • Vivint Solar Review
      • See All Companies
    • Common Solar Questions
      • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
      • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
      • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
      • Can You Finance Solar?
      • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
      • Payback On Solar Panels?
    • Solar Resources
      • Interactive Solar Calculator
      • Federal Solar Tax Credit 2023
      • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
      • Tesla Solar Roof Review
      • Cheapest Solar Panels
    • Companies Compared
      • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs SunPower
      • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
      • SunPower vs ADT Solar

The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k
    EcoWatch
    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k
    Home Renewable Energy

    Grid Credits for California’s Home Solar Users Could Fall 75% Under New Proposal

    By: Olivia Rosane
    Updated: November 13, 2022
    Edited by Irma Omerhodzic
    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon
    Solar Panels on terrace
    Rooftop solar in California. Raimund Koch / Getty Images
    Why you can trust us

    Founded in 2005 as an Ohio-based environmental newspaper, EcoWatch is a digital platform dedicated to publishing quality, science-based content on environmental issues, causes, and solutions.

    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

    California has more rooftop solar than any other state in the U.S., generating as much electricity through this renewable energy source as 12 nuclear power plants, according to figures reported by The New York Times.

    But the current way rooftop solar is regulated causes a conundrum. Right now, homeowners who install solar panels are able to receive a substantial credit for energy they sell back to the grid. This creates an incentive to adopt solar power, which is important for meeting the state’s ambitious climate goals. But there’s a catch: the credit ends up being unfair to low-income Californians who cannot afford to install solar panels and are stuck paying for relatively more of the cost of powering the state. 

    “The crux of the problem is that rooftop solar households don’t fully contribute to utility fixed costs: transmission and distribution, wildfire mitigation and compensation, energy efficiency programs, low-income subsidies and early technology investments, to name a few. So, households without rooftop solar pay higher rates to meet the revenue needs for fixed costs,”  former senior energy advisor for the U.S. Agency for International Development Robert Archer explained in a recent OpEd to the Marin Independent Journal. “This is the real ‘solar tax.’”

    To address these issues, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) proposed new rules Thursday for governing what is known as the Net Energy Metering (NEM) solar tariff. 

    The new proposal would, according to Cal Matters:

    1. Reduce the credit that solar-panel users receive for selling electricity back to the grid by as much as 75 percent, though this would not apply to people already taking advantage of the credit.
    2. Encourage customers to install solar panels with a battery system.
    3. Adjust rates so that customers use power at times of day which increase the reliability of the grid.
    4. Provide $900 million in solar incentive payments, with $630 million going towards low-income Californians.

    CPUC said that, under the new proposal, the average customer of California utilities Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison or San Diego Gas & Electric will save $100 a month on their electricity bill if they install solar going forward and at least $136 a month if they install solar panels and a battery. This would be enough savings for people to pay off the installation costs in nine years or less.

    Under the CPUC's proposal issued today, new residential solar customers can save $100/month on average on their electricity bills & there are also upfront incentives available for battery storage. California is supporting rooftop solar & battery storage. https://t.co/9KsADeUCKU pic.twitter.com/rWu4UU2v31

    — California PUC (@californiapuc) November 11, 2022

    “The update launches the solar industry into the future so that it can support the modern grid by incentivizing solar paired with battery storage and the adoption of electric vehicles, heat pump water heaters, and other electrification appliances while making rates more affordable for Californians,” CPUC said in a press release.

    The new update is a revision of a previous proposal that would have charged homeowners with new solar installations  $8 per kilowatt a month, according to Cal Matters. The solar industry and other clean energy advocates said this would have made it much harder for California to meet its goal of getting  90 percent of its energy from carbon-free sources by 2035 and 100 percent by 2045.

    While the solar industry is glad the fee has been removed, it also criticized the reduction in credits. 

    “If passed as is, the C.P.U.C.’s proposal would protect utility monopolies and boost their profits, while making solar less affordable and delaying the goal of 100 percent clean energy,” California Solar and Storage Association Executive Director Bernadette Del Chiaro told The New York Times. 

    On the other side of the argument, pro-equity group Affordable Clean Energy for All–a coalition of 120 groups representing low-income Californians, environmentalists and labor–was equally dissatisfied. 

    “It is extremely disappointing that under this proposal, low-income families and all customers without solar will continue to pay a hidden tax on their electricity bills to subsidize rooftop solar for mostly wealthier Californians,” Affordable Clean Energy For All spokesperson Kathy Fairbanks said in a press release. “The failure to finally eliminate the growing cost burden carried by non-solar customers in California is particularly troublesome given the billions of dollars in new federal clean energy subsidies that will ensure continued growth and healthy profits for large solar corporations for the next decade.”

    The Inflation Reduction Act and bipartisan infrastructure law provide incentives for both large utilities building clean energy installations and tax credits for individuals installing home solar or purchasing electric cars, The New York Times noted.

    Affordable Clean Energy for All cited figures stating that around 70 percent of home solar users in California are in the wealthiest 40 percent of the population. Further, Californians without home solar pay an extra $3.4 billion per year in electricity bills as a group and $245 for the average customer. At current rates, that would rise to $10.7 billion per year collectively and more than $550 per year individually by 2030. 

    The new proposal will be voted on by the CPUC in December and put into effect in April if approved, according to Cal Matters. The public will be able to comment at a meeting Wednesday, November 16. 

    Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

      By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy & to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

      Olivia Rosane

      Olivia Rosane is a freelance writer and reporter with a decade’s worth of experience. She has been contributing to EcoWatch daily since 2018 and has also covered environmental themes for Treehugger, The Trouble, YES! Magazine and Real Life. She holds a Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Cambridge and a master’s in Art and Politics from Goldsmiths, University of London.
      Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

      Read More

      Volkswagen Announces Plans for a More Affordable Electric Car
      German carmaker Volkswagen (VW) has announced the details of a
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
      Property Values of Homes Near Solar Farms Appraised in New Study
      Some opponents to solar farms have argued that they will
      By Paige Bennett
      Silicon Valley Bank Collapse Could Hurt Renewables
      The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is generating questions
      By Climate Nexus

      Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

        By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy & to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

        Latest Articles

        • Arctic Sea Ice Maximum Extent Is Fifth Lowest on Record
          by Olivia Rosane
          March 17, 2023
        • Global Freshwater Demand Will Exceed Supply 40% by 2030, Experts Warn
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          March 17, 2023
        • Train Derails, Leaks an Estimated 5,000 Gallons of Fuel on Reservation in Washington
          by Paige Bennett
          March 17, 2023
        • Forest Recovery Can Offset Some Tropical Deforestation Emissions, But Not All
          by Olivia Rosane
          March 17, 2023
        • Two Aging UK Coal Plants to Shutter in March Despite Government Requests to Remain on Standby
          by Olivia Rosane
          March 17, 2023
        • Meet Europe’s Latest National Park, A Wild River in the Heart of Albania
          by Olivia Rosane
          March 17, 2023
        • Volkswagen Announces Plans for a More Affordable Electric Car
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          March 16, 2023
        • Property Values of Homes Near Solar Farms Appraised in New Study
          by Paige Bennett
          March 16, 2023
        EcoWatch

        The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

          • Climate Climate
          • Animals Animals
          • Health + Wellness Health + Wellness
          • Insights + Opinion Insights + Opinion
          • Adventure Adventure
          • Oceans Oceans
          • Business Business
          • Solar Solar
          • About EcoWatch
          • Contact EcoWatch
          • EcoWatch Reviews
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy Policy
          • Learn About Solar Energy
          • Learn About Deregulated Energy
          • EcoWatch UK
          Follow Us
          Facebook 573k
          Twitter 238k
          Instagram 37k
          Subscribe Subscribe

          Experts for a healthier planet and life.

          Mentioned by:
          Learn more