Bill Nye Says 'Give a F**k' About Climate Change and Forget 'Deflategate'
Everybody is talking about "Deflategate"—the tantalizing question of whether someone connected with the New England Patriots deflated their footballs prior to their game against the Indianapolis Colts that earned them a slot in the Super Bowl this weekend. Sportscasters and fans have been buzzing since that Jan. 18 game how this could have happened and how much of an advantage the easier-to-catch balls might have conferred on the Patriots.
Bill Nye the Science Guy is talking about it too, and—no surprise, he decided to get all science-y about the issue. Testing a claim by Patriots coach Bill Belichick that the deflation was due to natural weather conditions, he decided to see if placing room-temperature footballs in a refrigerator set at the game-day temperature of 51 degrees would cause them to deflate.
While he was waiting for the balls to cool down, Nye took the opportunity to remind listeners about something else: climate change is a lot more important than deflated footballs.
"While we're all obsessed with deflategate, let's keep in mind that there's something about which you should give a f**k," he said. "Yes, like [Patriots quarterback] Tom Brady, the world is getting hotter and hotter, and you know why? Because we human beings are pumping carbon dioxide in the atmosphere every time we burn fossil fuels, when we burn gasoline in our cars, and when Tom Brady and Bill Belichick start talking for two-and-a half-hours in press conferences, spewing out carbon dioxide, making climate change that much worse."
"What should we do about this?" he said. "You should vote for congressmen and senators that appreciate the threat of climate change and the rate at which the world is getting warmer so that we can preserve the earth for humankind for generations to come."
Clearly not high on his list of people you should vote for is Tennessee Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn whom he took down in a video a few months ago saying that "it sounded like she’s been coached on denial bullet points."
Oh—and the footballs? Nye didn't find any significant change in them after cooling.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
By Robin Scher
Beyond the questions surrounding the availability, effectiveness and safety of a vaccine, the COVID-19 pandemic has led us to question where our food is coming from and whether we will have enough.
- Can Urban Farms Prevent Hunger in 54 Million People in the U.S. ... ›
- New Report Finds Malnutrition World's Top Killer Amid Pandemic ... ›
- Oxfam Warns 12,000 Could Die Per Day From Hunger Due to ... ›
- Three Ways to Support a Healthy Food System During the COVID ... ›
- Trump USDA Resumes Effort to Cut Food Stamp Benefits - EcoWatch ›
- Pandemic Threatens Food Security for Many College Students ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Tearing through the crowded streets of Philadelphia, an electric car and a gas-powered car sought to win a heated race. One that mimicked how cars are actually used. The cars had to stop at stoplights, wait for pedestrians to cross the street, and swerve in and out of the hundreds of horse-drawn buggies. That's right, horse-drawn buggies. Because this race took place in 1908. It wanted to settle once and for all which car was the superior urban vehicle. Although the gas-powered car was more powerful, the electric car was more versatile. As the cars passed over the finish line, the defeat was stunning. The 1908 Studebaker electric car won by 10 minutes. If in 1908, the electric car was clearly the better form of transportation, why don't we drive them now? Today, I'm going to answer that question by diving into the history of electric cars and what I discovered may surprise you.
As bitcoin's fortunes and prominence rise, so do concerns about its environmental impact.
- 15 Top Conservation Issues of 2021 Include Big Threats, Potential ... ›
- How Blockchain Could Boost Clean Energy - EcoWatch ›
By David Drake and Jeffrey York
The Research Brief is a short take about interesting academic work.
The Big Idea
People often point to plunging natural gas prices as the reason U.S. coal-fired power plants have been shutting down at a faster pace in recent years. However, new research shows two other forces had a much larger effect: federal regulation and a well-funded activist campaign that launched in 2011 with the goal of ending coal power.
- Major Milestone: More than 100,000 MW Worth of Coal-Fired Power ... ›
- Coal Will Not Bring Appalachia Back to Life, But Tech and ... ›
- Renewables Beat Coal in the U.S. for the First Time This April ... ›