Judge Says Trump’s Plan to Allow Drilling in Arctic Ocean Is ‘Unlawful and Invalid’
A federal judge has restored prohibitions against drilling in the Arctic Ocean designed to protect polar bears and other wildlife. Universal History Archive / UIG via Getty Images
A federal judge in Alaska ruled on Friday that President Donald Trump “exceeded the president’s authority” when he signed an executive order to allow offshore oil drilling in around 125 million acres of the Arctic Ocean, CNN reported.
U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason’s decision restores a ban on drilling in 98 percent of the U.S.-controlled Arctic Ocean, according to Earthjustice, which sued to stop Trump’s order on behalf of several environmental groups and Alaska Native communities.
The ruling “shows that the president cannot just trample on the constitution to do the bidding of his cronies in the fossil fuel industry at the expense of our oceans, wildlife and climate,” Earthjustice attorney Erik Grafe said in a statement reported by the Associated Press.
VICTORY: Last night a judge struck down President Trump's Executive Order purporting to undo President Obama's permanent protections of the Arctic Ocean and key parts of the Atlantic from drilling. Read about this Northern Fight >> https://t.co/nDWo4uvpUN pic.twitter.com/v7hYhGeJRI
— Earthjustice (@Earthjustice) March 30, 2019
Former president Barack Obama had instituted the ban via three memoranda and one executive order, protecting much of the Arctic Ocean and parts of the Atlantic as well. In her ruling Friday, Gleason said that the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act allows the president to withdraw lands from leasing, but not to reverse a previous withdrawal. That, she said, can only be done by Congress.
“The wording of President Obama’s 2015 and 2016 withdrawals indicates that he intended them to extend indefinitely, and therefore be revocable only by an act of Congress,” Gleason said, according to CNN. She said the executive order allowing drilling was therefore “unlawful and invalid.”
Obama had intended the bans to protect polar bears, walruses, ice seals and the Native Alaskan communities that depend on these animals. He also banned exploration in 5,937 square miles of canyons in the Atlantic to protect deep-water corals, migrating whales and other marine mammals and fish populations, the Associated Press reported.
“This victory shows that no one, not even Trump, is above the law,” League of Conservation Voters President Gene Karpinski said in a statement reported by CNN. “Offshore drilling and the associated threat of devastating oil spills puts coastal economies and ways of life at risk while worsening the consequences of climate change. President Trump wanted to erase all the environmental progress we’ve made, but we fought back and we won.”
The Trump administration, the state of Alaska and the American Petroleum Institute all defended the executive order in court.
“While we disagree with the decision, our nation still has a significant opportunity before us in the development of the next offshore leasing plan to truly embrace our nation’s energy potential and ensure American consumers and businesses continue to benefit from U.S. energy leadership,” an American Petroleum Institute spokesperson told CNN in a statement.
Judge Gleason’s decision is likely to be appealed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
We can stop drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge! @alaskawildact @sierraclublive https://t.co/Ac9nxbmNu2
— EcoWatch (@EcoWatch) February 13, 2019
- Not Enough Ice! Arctic Drilling a 'Disaster Waiting to Happen ...
- Trump Administration's Alaska Oil and Gas Lease Sale a 'Major Flop ...
- Trump Admin Pushes Final Drilling Plan for Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - EcoWatch