A Fierce Green Fire: The Battle for a Living Planet Premiers Earth Day on PBS
Mark Kitchell’s 1990 Oscar nominated documentary, Berkeley in the Sixties, covered the campus activism that disrupted the House Un-American Activities Committee’s hearings, launched the Free Speech Movement, fought the police at People’s Park and inspired student spokesman Mario Savio to declare: “There comes a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can’t take part … You’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop.”
Now Kitchell is back with another stand up and cheer nonfiction film about a different movement: environmentalism and its eco-warriors who, as Savio put it, “indicate to the people who run it, the people who own it, that unless you’re free, the machine will be prevented from working at all.”
Like a classical Greek drama, Kitchell’s well-crafted and briskly paced A Fierce Green Fire has a five-act structure, as each segment focuses on different aspects and leaders of the environmental movement over the past half a century, with narration by a prominent artist or activist. The title is derived from a section in environmental philosopher Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac in which he describes his ecological awakening after shooting a wolf while working as a U.S. Forest Service Ranger: “We reached the old wolf in time to watch a fierce green fire dying in her eyes.”
The documentary—which will air Tuesday, Earth Day, on PBS stations nationwide—opens with a stirring montage of idyllic nature, followed by ecosystem despoliation and devastation, such as mountaintop removal coal mining in West Virginia. Scenes of global activism appear, including NASA scientist Jim Hansen getting busted at the White House for protesting the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline and of Nobel Peace Prize winner Wangari Maathai declaring: “We will shed blood for land!” This riveting, rapidly cut sequence is set to the pulsating beat of the Chamber Brothers’ “Time Has Come Today.”
Oscar-winning actor and activist Robert Redford—who is also a Natural Resources Defense Council trustee and honorary board member of the Mikhail Gorbachev-founded Green Cross—narrates Act 1. This first section is all about the founding roots of what used to be called the conservation movement. It concentrates on the Sierra Club’s struggles to conserve land, beginning with founder John Muir’s 1913 opposition to damming Yosemite National Park’s Hetch Hetchy valley. Then it fast-forwards to the 1960s, when the Sierra Club and its first executive director, Berkeley-born David Brower, spearheaded another crusade to prevent the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation from building dams in the Grand Canyon.
Full-page Washington Post and New York Times ads plaintively asked: “Should we also flood the Sistine Chapel so tourists can get nearer to the ceiling?” Decades before the current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) flap, the feds retaliated by suspending the Sierra Club’s non-profit status—a move that backfired when membership exploded. The dams were defeated.
As Redford notes, “The sixties brought the flowering of conservation.” Other period highlights, such as the burning of the polluted Cuyahoga River in Cleveland and the first photos of planet Earth from outer space, are noted. Cue Joni Mitchell’s “Big Yellow Taxi”: “Don’t it always seem to go/That you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone?/ They paved paradise put up a parking lot.”
A Fierce Green Fire screenshot
Masses of people are seen rising up to keep what they’ve got. Twenty million people participated in the first Earth Day—April 22, 1970—the largest one-day demonstration in human history. We see Senator Gaylord Nelson, who first conceived of Earth Day, the poet Alan Ginsburg and black organizer James Farmer, who denounces an “equality of extinction.”
In Act 2, narrated by actress Ashley Judd, an unlikely hero of sorts emerges: President Richard Nixon, who, as he seeks to respond to the rising tide of activism and awareness, establishes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Although Tricky Dick opposes the Clean Water Act his veto is overridden, and other environmental measures, such as the Endangered Species Act, become law.
A decade after Rachel Carson’s cautionary Silent Spring the EPA bans DDT in 1972. This section shines a light on the late seventies’ outrage over Love Canal, the Upstate New York community which Hooker Chemical Company used as a toxic dump, causing widespread sickness among children and birth defects. Fiery housewife Lois Gibbs leads the opposition to the powers that be, and the struggle culminates in another eco-victory when Gibbs meets with President Jimmy Carter and Congress passes Superfund legislation for hazardous waste site cleanups. But a rollback occurs with the election to the White House of reactionary Ronald Reagan, who as California’s governor had called the cops out on those Berkeley students and as president denounced “environmental extremism.”
Van Jones—who for a few months in 2009 was the Obama Administration’s Special Advisor for Green Jobs before red-baiting forced him out and now co-hosts CNN’s Crossfire—narrates Act 3. With its focus on the early days of Greenpeace, this is probably A Fierce Green Fire’s fiercest, most action-packed segment. Paul Watson, Rex Weyler, Bob Hunter and other eco-warriors wage war on whalers and those slaughtering seals in the Arctic. Espousing a militant philosophy with confrontational tactics, Watson boldly declares: “I work for whales and turtles, not people.”
Since saving Earth is truly a planetary undertaking, Act 4 goes beyond the U.S. in an episode entitled “Going Global” narrated by novelist Isabel Allende. Much of the story centers on the fight to protect the Brazilian Amazon. The hero is union organizer and rubber tree tapper Chico Mendes, who opposed deforestation, logging, road paving and supported forest preserves and Indigenous rights until he was murdered in 1988. Allende closes her segment by introducing the next one, referring to Act 5 as “the mother of all environmental issues.”
That, of course, means climate change. The documentary’s grand finale is narrated by none other than Meryl Streep as she examines the science and politics of global warming. We see NASA physicist James Hansen testifying before Congress way back in 1988 and warning that “the greenhouse effect has been detected.” Indian anti-globalization author and 1993 Right Livelihood Award winner Dr. Vandana Shiva speaks briefly, and The End of Nature author Bill McKibben denounces Washington’s inaction. The co-founder of 350.org is a pioneer in the struggle against climate change and visceral opponent of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline who participated in civil disobedience against it, for which he was jailed in Washington.
Although one can’t cover everything in an hour-long documentary that spans 50 years, the film is hamstrung by some serious omissions. For example, three of environmentalism’s current bêtes noir—the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, fracking and nuclear power—are little mentioned, if at all, in A Fierce Green Fire.
To pay tribute to Earth Day, A Fierce Green Fire is scheduled to air nationwide at 9 p.m. on April 22 on PBS stations (check local listings).
Asked about these omissions director/producer/writer Mark Kitchell responded via email: “We made the film before Keystone began—and we tried to work it into the film as we edited. But it kept getting pushed to the ending and the ending became that mosaic of protest all over the world. That’s where a bunch of more contemporary activism ended up,” including the “Keystone XL protest when they surround the White House.”
Some activists might consider the film’s scant or absent coverage of current issues to be shortcomings, if not major oversights. But aside from these lapses, A Fierce Green Fire offers a rousing overview of the movement that just might, literally, save the world.
Kitchell’s documentary is part of the American Masters biography series, which is a production of THIRTEEN (its parent company, WNET, is New York’s PBS member TV station). The distinguished American Masters series—which has won 26 Emmys, 12 Peabodys, three Grammys plus an Oscar—generally celebrates and profiles institutions and individuals who have made outstanding contributions to America’s arts and culture. Past subjects include Arthur Miller, Ella Fitzgerald, Albert Einstein, the Joffrey Ballet, Walter Cronkite, Martha Graham, the Actor’s Studio, John Lennon and John James Audubon. It is certainly a high honor, and completely appropriate, for the environmental movement and its leading champions to be among such esteemed and exalted company.
YOU ALSO MIGHT LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
The U.S. reported more than 55,000 new coronavirus cases on Thursday, in a sign that the outbreak is not letting up as the Fourth of July weekend kicks off.
- The U.S. Isn't in a Second Wave of Coronavirus – The First Wave ... ›
- Navajo Nation Has Highest Covid-19 Infection Rate in the U.S. ... ›
- U.S. Coronavirus Cases Top 2 Million as All 50 States Start ... ›
By Jason Bruck
Human actions have taken a steep toll on whales and dolphins. Some studies estimate that small whale abundance, which includes dolphins, has fallen 87% since 1980 and thousands of whales die from rope entanglement annually. But humans also cause less obvious harm. Researchers have found changes in the stress levels, reproductive health and respiratory health of these animals, but this valuable data is extremely hard to collect.
Researchers work with trained dolphins to learn more about their sensory abilities, seen here testing a dolphin's hearing. Jason Bruck / CC BY-ND
A Lot to Learn From Hormones<p>When sampling the blow, we are looking for hormones in mucus as these can be used to gauge psychological and physiological health. We are specifically interested in <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0114062" target="_blank">hormones like cortisol</a> and <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.04.003" target="_blank">progesterone</a>, which indicate stress levels and reproductive ability respectively, but can also help determine overall health.</p><p>Additionally, blow samples can detect <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1128%2FmSystems.00119-17" target="_blank">respiratory pathogens</a> in the lungs or nasal passages - blowholes evolved from noses after all.</p><p>This health analysis is especially important in areas with oil spills as the chemicals can cause hormonal problems that harm <a href="https://www.carmmha.org/investigating-how-oil-spills-affect-dolphins-and-whales/" target="_blank">development, metabolism and reproduction</a> in dolphins.</p><p>Hormone samples can provide scientists with valuable data, but collecting them from intelligent and unpredictable animals is challenging.</p>
Cetacean Collaborators<p>To build a drone that can stealthily collect spray from moving dolphins, we needed more data on their eyesight and hearing, and this is data that couldn't be collected in the wild nor simulated in a lab.</p><p>We worked with dolphins at facilities like Dolphin Quest in Bermuda, which provides guests opportunities to learn about dolphins while allowing <a href="https://dolphinquest.com/about-us/our-story/" target="_blank">scientists access to animals for noninvasive research</a>. Here the dolphins can swim away if they choose not to work with us, so we had to design the study like a game; the way a kindergarten teacher entertains a class. If the dolphins aren't interested, we don't get to do the science.</p><p>Over the course of hundreds of sessions, we sought to answer two questions: What can dolphins hear and what can they see around their heads?</p><p>To test dolphin hearing, we set up microphones and cameras to record dolphin behavior as we played drone noise in the air. We analyzed the responses to each noise – such as how many dolphins looked at the speaker – and used these as a proxy for their ability to hear the sounds.</p>
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="5f31daf07a652b8d64a093b993ee4e96"><iframe lazy-loadable="true" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/UjmQeH3vXHI?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
Robodolphin doesn't look like a real dolphin, but it doesn't need to in order to train our drone pilots. C.J. Barton / Oklahoma State University / CC BY-ND<p>To build robodolphin, we worked with dolphins trained to "chuff" or sneeze on command to measure spray characteristics. We used high-speed photography to see the dolphins' breath as it moved through the air. Then we conducted high resolution CT scans of a dolphin head and 3D-printed a replica of a nasal passage.</p><p>Now, we have a complete robodolphin and are tweaking its sprays to be nearly identical to the real thing. This will allow us to determine how close we need to get to collect the samples, and therefore, how quiet our drone needs to be.</p>
The replica dolphin blowhole was designed from a scan of a real blowhole passage, and the spray it produces closely matches the real thing. Alvin Ngo, Mitch Ford and CJ Barton / Oklahoma State University / CC BY-ND
A Bit of Practice, Then Into the Wild<p>In the next few months, we will test flights over robodolphin with existing drones to determine the timing and strategy for collection. From there, we will fabricate a low-noise drone that can fly fast enough and with sufficient maneuverability to capture samples from wild dolphins. Like a video game, we will use the visual field data to develop approach trajectories to stay in the visual blindspots.</p><p>We plan to test our drones on a truck-mounted robodolphin moving down a runway, then using a boat to simulate realistic conditions. The next steps will involve ocean testing with dolphins trained for open ocean swimming. These tests will determine if our devices can catch and hold the hormones as the drone flies back to a researcher's boat.</p><p>Finally, we will deploy the system to collect data on wild dolphins. Our first goal is to test resident dolphins – animals that live on the coasts and deal directly with boat and oil industry noise – which will allow us to learn more about stress resulting from human impacts.</p><p>Those samples are a way off, but if all goes well we will have a specially built drone capable of flying long distances and capturing samples undetected in a few years. The samples collected will allow researchers to do better science with impact on the animals they study.</p>
- Drone Footage Captures Rare Finless Porpoises in Hong Kong ... ›
- Brazil's Amazon River Dolphin Faces Extinction After Fishing ... ›
- 10 Surprising Dolphin 'Superpowers' - EcoWatch ›
Sunscreen pollution is accelerating the demise of coral reefs globally by causing permanent DNA damage to coral. gonzalo martinez / iStock / Getty Images Plus
On July 29, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed into law a controversial bill prohibiting local governments from banning certain types of sunscreens.
- Your Guide to Reef Friendly Sunscreens - EcoWatch ›
- Hundreds of Sunscreens Don't Work or Have Unsafe Ingredients ... ›
- FDA Study: Sunscreen Chemicals Seep Into the Bloodstream ... ›
By Kelli McGrane
Oat milk is popping up at coffee shops and grocery stores alike, quickly becoming one of the trendiest plant-based milks.
- Is Oat Milk Gluten-Free? - EcoWatch ›
- What Nutritionists Think About Starbucks' Three New Plant-Based ... ›
- 6 Alternatives to Milk: Which Is the Healthiest? - EcoWatch ›
"Emissions from pyrotechnic displays are composed of numerous organic compounds as well as metals," a new study reports. Nodar Chernishev / EyeEm / Getty Images
Fireworks have taken a lot of heat recently. In South Dakota, fire experts have said President Trump's plan to hold a fireworks show is dangerous and public health experts have criticized the lack of plans to enforce mask wearing or social distancing. Now, a new study shows that shooting off fireworks at home may expose you and your family to dangerous levels of lead, copper and other toxins.
- No Social Distancing or Mask Requirement at Trump's Mt ... ›
- Trump's Fireworks Show at Mt. Rushmore Is a Dangerous Idea, Fire ... ›
By Ashutosh Pandey
Billions worth of valuable metals such as gold, silver and copper were dumped or burned last year as electronic waste produced globally jumped to a record 53.6 million tons (Mt), or 7.3 kilogram per person, a UN report showed on Thursday.
Environmental and Health Hazard<p>Experts say e-waste, which is now the world's fastest-growing domestic waste stream, poses serious environmental and health risks.</p><p>Simply throwing away electronic items without ensuring they get properly recycled leads to the loss of key materials such as iron, copper and gold, which can otherwise be recovered and used as primary raw materials to make new equipment, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions from extraction and refinement of raw materials.</p><p>Refrigerants found in electronic equipment such as fridge and air conditioners also contribute to global warming. A total of 98 Mt of CO2-equivalents, or about 0.3% of global energy-related emissions, were released into the atmosphere in 2019 from discarded refrigerators and ACs that were not recycled properly, the report said.</p><p>E-waste contains several toxic additives or hazardous substances, such as mercury and brominated flame retardants (BFR), and simply burning it or throwing it away could lead to serious health issues. Several studies have linked unregulated recycling of e-waste to adverse birth outcomes like stillbirth and premature birth, damages to the human brain or nervous system and in some cases hearing loss and heart troubles.</p><p>"Informal and improper e-waste recycling is a major emerging hazard silently affecting our health and that of future generations. One in four children are dying from avoidable environmental exposures," said Maria Neira, director of the Environment, Climate Change and Health Department at the World Health Organization. "One in four children could be saved, if we take action to protect their health and ensure a safe environment."</p>
Europe Leads the Way<p>While most of the e-waste was generated in Asia (24.9 Mt) in 2019, Europe led the charts on a per person basis with 16.2 kg per capita, the report said.</p><p>But the continent also recorded the <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/the-eu-declares-war-on-e-waste/a-51108790" target="_blank">highest documented formal e-waste collection and recycling</a> rate at 42.5%, still below its target of 65%. Europe was well ahead of the others on this front. Asia ranked second with 11.7%.</p><p>The authors said while more that 70% of the world's population was covered by some form of e-waste policy or laws, not much was being done toward implementation and enforcement of the regulations to encourage the take-up of a collection and recycling infrastructure due to lack of investment and political motivation.</p><p>"You have to think about new economic systems," said Kühr.</p><p>One approach could be that consumers no longer buy the products, but only the service they offer. The device would remain the property of the maker, who would then have an interest in offering his customers the best service and the necessary equipment. The maker would also be interested in designing his products in such a way that they are easier to repair and easier to recycle, Kühr said.</p>
- Dangerous Chemicals From E-Waste Found in Black Plastics From ... ›
- Electronic Waste Study Finds $65 Billion in Raw Materials ... ›
- Electronic Waste: New EU Rules Target Throwaway Culture ... ›
- COVID-19 Masks Are Polluting Beaches and Oceans - EcoWatch ›
- Plastic Packaging Use Increases During the Coronavirus - EcoWatch ›
- Coronavirus Worsens Thailand's Plastic Waste Crisis - EcoWatch ›
- Coronavirus Plastic Waste Polluting the Environment - EcoWatch ›