This Year's E-Waste to Outweigh Great Wall of China
2021's mountain of waste didn't grow out of nowhere.
October 14th is International E-Waste Day, and, to raise awareness about this growing problem, the waste electrical and electronic equipment forum, or WEEE Forum, has published an alarming statistic.
In 2021, human beings will discard an estimated 57.4 million tonnes (approximately 63.3 million U.S. tons) of electronic waste. That waste will outweigh the Great Wall of China, the world's heaviest human construction. This is why the WEEE Forum is calling for these items to be repaired or recycled instead of discarded.
"This year's focus for International E-Waste Day is the crucial role each of us has in making circularity a reality for e-products," WEEE Forum Director General Pascal Leroy said in a statement. "This is more important than ever as our Governments go into COP26 to discuss global action to reduce carbon emissions. Every tonne of WEEE recycled avoids around 2 tonnes of CO2 emissions. If we all do the right thing with our e-waste we help to reduce harmful CO2 emissions."
2021's mountain of waste didn't grow out of nowhere. In 2019, humans generated 53.6 million tonnes (approximately 59.1 million tons), up 21 percent from 2014. If nothing changes, that number is supposed to hit 74 million tonnes (approximately 81.6 million tons) by 2030, meaning that e-waste is growing by about three to four percent every year.
WEEE Forum attributes this growth to the growing consumption of electronics, smaller periods between new product releases and limited options for repairing broken items.
One example of this cycle is the development and marketing of cell phones.
"Fast mobile phone development, for example, has led to a market dependency on rapid replacement of older devices," Leroy told BBC News.
In the U.S., around 151 million phones end up in landfills or incinerators every year, which amounts to 416,000 a day, WEEE Forum said. Overall, only 17.4 percent of electronic waste is properly recycled worldwide.
This is a major waste both financially and ecologically.
"A tonne of discarded mobile phones is richer in gold than a tonne of gold ore," Dr. Ruediger Kuehr, director of the UN's Sustainable Cycles (SCYCLE) Programme, said in a statement. "Embedded in 1 million cell phones, for example, are 24 kg of gold, 16,000 kg of copper, 350 kg of silver, and 14 kg of palladium — resources that could be recovered and returned to the production cycle. And if we fail to recycle these materials, new supplies need to be mined, harming the environment."
Recovering these metals from electronic waste would also burn fewer greenhouse gas emissions than mining for new materials.
In honor of International E-Waste Day, the WEEE Forum is calling on individuals to do their part by making sure they dispose of their waste correctly.
"We hope to raise awareness among citizens of the importance of returning electricals that are no longer functioning or are unused," Leroy told Australia's ABC News. "In Europe, one out of seven electricals in the household is sitting in drawers because they are not used or not functioning."
However, industry and policymakers have important roles to play in creating the recycling and repair systems consumers can easily use.
"Consumers want to do the right thing but need to be adequately informed and a convenient infrastructure should be easily available to them so that disposing of e-waste correctly becomes the social norm in communities," Magdalena Charytanowicz of the WEEE Forum said in a statement.
Olivia has been writing on the internet for more than five years and has covered social movements for YES! Magazine and ecological themes for Real Life. For her recent master's in Art and Politics at Goldsmiths, University of London, she completed a creative dissertation imagining sustainable communities surviving in post-climate-change London.
She has lived in New York, Vermont, London, and Seattle, but wherever she lives, she likes to go to the greenest place she can find, take long, meandering walks, and write poems about its wildflowers.
Follow her on Twitter @orosane.
- Video: Planned Obsolescence Sucks. Here's Why It Still Exists. ›
- Electronic Waste: New EU Rules Target Throwaway Culture ... ›
- E-Waste Management Is Not Keeping Pace With Consumer ... ›
Are you getting enough vitamin D? Statistically, probably not. One billion people worldwide and 42 percent of people in the United States are vitamin D deficient — and most don't even know it.
The NIH recommends 600-800 IU per day, but it is recommended that vegetarians and vegans shoot for the top of that range. The amount every person needs depends on their age and other factors as well. Babies need less (400), while most kids and adults need 600. If you are a senior citizen, consider upping your intake to at least 800, but keep in mind the upper limit of how much anyone should take is 4,000. After that, you could experience nausea, vomiting and weakness.
But that's not an issue for most people. More often than not, the vitamin D levels are too low. Black and Hispanic populations are at greatest risk. If you aren't getting enough vitamin D, you might feel fatigue, muscle pain, and weakened bones. Vitamin D deficiency can also cause stunted growth in children.
Yes, we can get vitamin D from sunlight, but with more and more of us living and working inside, getting our daily dose of sun is getting harder. Getting it through your diet can be tricky — especially if you are a vegetarian or vegan because most foods containing the vitamin are animal-based. But don't despair! There are vegetarian and vegan-friendly foods that can help you increase your Vitamin D levels.
1. Mushrooms

Mushrooms are the only plant-based sources of vitamin D found in nature. They have a compound which when exposed to sunlight converts into vitamin D2. The FDA has even approved UV-treated mushrooms as an additive to other foods to increase vitamin D intake.
Of course, mushrooms typically grow in darkness, but that doesn't mean you can't boost their vitamin D levels on your own. Simply spread them out on a baking sheet and put them in the sun from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. These D levels don't decrease when cooked, either. And the vitamin D levels have a long shelf life, too, so you can prepare them and then cook or eat them anytime.
Be careful when consuming mushrooms — especially wild ones. Not all wild mushrooms are edible and consuming poisonous mushrooms can make you sick or even kill you, so make sure you buy yours at the grocery store or trusted farmers market.
2. Fortified Cereals

Just because it's not found in nature, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Many foods are fortified with vitamin D, including almost every mainstream cereal you can buy. This includes dry cereals and most oatmeal.
3. Fortified Nondairy Milks

And what do you wash that cereal down with? Plant-based milks like almond, soy, rice and even cashew milk, are fortified with vitamin D, too. One cup can get you 10-25 percent of your daily value. Keep in mind that if the milk doesn't specifically say that it is fortified, it will have very low levels of vitamin D because the vitamin doesn't occur naturally in the substance.
4. Fortified Orange Juice

Not a milk fan? When it comes to orange juice, there are a lot of options. Not all are fortified with vitamin D but you can almost always find one that has both calcium and vitamin D3. It's been shown that drinking fortified orange juice can raise your D levels the same amount as if you were taking supplements. While they can provide you with 10-25 percent of your D intake, you don't want to rely on juice alone for vitamin D. It has a lot of sugar and no fiber to buffer that sucrose spike. To counteract this, consider using OJ as part of a vitamin and protein-rich smoothie.
5. Tofu

The best thing about tofu is how versatile it is. You can include it in a variety of meals, for any time of day. Not all tofu is fortified but some can contain up to 20 percent of your daily vitamin D requirements. It also has vitamin B12 and omega 3 fats, which are also necessary for vegetarian diets. You can scramble it in the morning for breakfast, throw it in a soup or stew or curry, or spice it and toss it with rice or other plant-based dinner options.
6. Sunshine

You can be your own source of vitamin D! In fact, this is how most people get quite a bit of it. The National Institutes of Health says that exposure of your face, arms, legs or back for 5-30 minutes twice a week is usually enough to get proper vitamin D levels. The exposure has to be without sunscreen though, so make sure not to stay out in those rays too long.
Depending on the time of year and where you live, the UV rays from the sun vary, so keep that in mind. Another factor is the amount of melanin you have. The more you have the longer you have to expose yourself to the sun's rays to get the desired result. Because of the cancer risks, it's recommended you get some of your vitamin D from other sources.
Takeaway
Vitamin D is fat-soluble so eating it alongside fatty foods will help with its absorption. Vitamin D helps bone growth, regulates the immune system, reduces inflammation, improves mood and helps metabolize glucose in the body. It also helps your body absorb calcium and helps regulate blood pressure and cholesterol, so not having enough of it can severely impact your health.
Make sure you are getting the amount you need to have energy and good health throughout the day.
Darlena Cunha is a freelance writer and a professor at the University of Florida, with degrees in communications and ecology.
The cost of solar panels has declined roughly 80% in the last decade, bolstering the technology's reputation as an affordable energy source like never before. Now that solar power has reached this cost-effective price point, customers and businesses looking to capitalize on the benefits of solar energy are flooding the market looking for cheap solar panels.
In this article, we'll discuss the most affordable solar panels available and whether it's better to save money upfront or invest in high-quality models. We'll also give recommendations for solar panels at the crossroads of affordability and efficiency, providing the best bang for your buck.
If you're looking for cheap solar panels, one way to find them is to get free quotes from multiple installation companies. By comparing pricing from a few local installers, you can make sure you're getting the best deal. To get started, fill out the simple form below.
Are Cheap Solar Panels Any Good?
The cheapest panels are typically manufactured in China (with the U.S. and Germany close behind), and some are cheap for a reason. They can come with underlying issues, most concerningly in the form of environmental and workers' rights violations in their production process.
Cheap solar panels also tend to be less durable and will likely come with a shorter lifespan. In fact, the cheapest upfront options sometimes end up being the most expensive in the long run. A good comparison is buying a car. Though the cheap initial cost of a beater may be the most tempting, frequent repairs, poor gas mileage and checkups can outweigh the initial savings within a few short years.
However, for those whose most important consideration is price, there are still some good options for cheap solar panels on the market today to turn your home into a renewable energy source.
Top 5 Cheap Solar Panels
Below are the five of the cheapest photovoltaic solar panels (that are rated at least 100W) on the market. Bear in mind that the current industry minimum for solar panels capable of powering a home is around 300W. Panels between 100W and 300W may be suitable for DIY solar projects, off-grid systems and charging things like portable generators or small appliances.
Note that prices and availability fluctuate with inventory, demand and supply chain issues. Prices change often when vendors have surplus supply, so sales are frequent. Customers will not be able to purchase some brands' panels directly, as they must be ordered from a distributor.
| Cheap Solar Panel | Price Per Panel | Power Rating | Price Per Watt | Efficiency Rating | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Renogy
100W 12 Volt Solar Panel |
$125 | 100W | $1.25 | 21% | 1-year materials warranty |
|
LONGi
#LR6-60-HPB-350M |
$225 | 350W | $0.60 | 20.3% | Limited 25-year warranty |
|
Canadian Solar
Model #CS1H-315MS |
$225 | 315W | $0.71 | 18.68% | 25-year output warranty |
|
Silfab Solar
- SIL-330 NL |
$250 | 330W | $0.76 | 17.3% | 12-year module warranty |
|
LONGi
#LR4-60-HPH-360M |
$260 | 360W | $0.72 | 19.8% | 25-year output warranty |
Cheap Vs. Affordable Solar Panels
There's a key distinction between cheap solar panels and the most affordable solar panels. Cheap considers only the price tag. Affordability involves factors beyond initial price, such as price per watt (aka bang for your buck), efficiency of the panel and warranty. A cheap solar panel isn't worth anything if it breaks without a warranty to replace it.
The cost of a solar panel is set by the manufacturer and involves a variety of factors, from cost of production to expected lifetime. Let's break down the factors that go into solar panel costs.
Solar Panel Efficiency
The greater a panel's efficiency, the more energy each solar cell's power output will be. Efficiency matters, as a homeowner will have to buy far fewer panels to meet their energy needs with higher-efficiency panels. The most solar efficient panels usually cost more to manufacture, raising their price point and total installed cost.
Solar Panel Power
The power, or wattage, of a solar panel reflects how many watts (W) of energy the panel is capable of generating when producing at maximum capacity. Most modern residential solar panels have power factors between 300 and 350W. As is true with high-efficiency panels, a customer needs to purchase fewer panels overall if they have a higher power output. While they'll typically have a greater upfront cost, high-output panels will provide better value over time.
Solar Panel Warranty
A warranty is simple to understand, yet no less important to consider. Bearing in mind that the average lifetime of a solar panel system is about 25 years, warranties are essential in ensuring reliable energy output. Though solar panels are very durable, a lot can happen over 25 years. Falling tree branches can crack a panel, rooftop critters can chew up wiring and untreated water damage can corrode a system. Some of the cheapest panels will come with the worst warranties, and costs can add up quickly if a solar power system runs into trouble.
Solar Panel Quality
Similar to solar panel efficiency and power, the cost of a solar panel has much to do with its quality. The cheapest solar panels on the market will be of the poorest quality, making them far more prone to breaks, issues and quick aging. The higher the quality of the parts in a solar panel, the more expensive it becomes. However, this is just another time when "cheap" panels are far from the most affordable solar panels in the long run.
5 Best Value Solar Panels
With all this in mind, below are our recommendations for the most affordable home solar panels on the market in 2021.
|
Most Affordable Solar Panel |
Price Per Panel | Power Rating | Price Per Watt | Efficiency Rating | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONGi
#LR6-60-HPB-350M |
$225 | 350W | $0.60 | 20.3% | Limited 25-year warranty |
|
Hanwha Q Cell
340W Q.PEAK DUO |
$240 | 340W | $0.70 | 19% | 25-year warranty |
|
Canadian Solar
Model #CS1H-315MS |
$225 | 315W | $0.71 | 18.68% | 25-year output warranty |
|
LONGi
#LR4-60-HPH-360M |
$260 | 360W | $0.72 | 19.8% | 25-year output warranty |
|
JA Solar Technology
JAM60S10 -340/MR |
$240 | 330W | $0.73 | 20.2% | 25-year output warranty |
LONGi and Q Cell are two of the most affordable solar brands that maintain reputations for good quality at a low price. As you can see, they both provide exceptional price per watt and efficiency without sacrificing warranty.
A solar installation with low price per watt and high efficiency provides a number of benefits for a solar customer. With more power and efficiency per panel, a homeowner won't need to purchase as many panels to meet their household energy needs.
FAQ: Cheap Solar Panels
What kind of solar panels are the cheapest?
Polycrystalline solar panels tend to be cheaper (and lower quality) than monocrystalline panels. You can read more about the difference between these types of panels in our monocrystalline vs. polycrystalline solar panel review.
What is the cheapest way to get solar panels?
The cheapest way to acquire solar panels is to purchase them through a distributor in bulk. Though one can save a significant amount of money purchasing and installing solar panels on their own, solar companies can access a wider range of products and get them for lower prices than what's available to the general public.
Should I buy cheap solar panels?
There are many excellent affordable options for solar panels due to the rapid advancement of the technology and industry behind them. There are also a great number of cheap panels that are unreliable, break easily and are likely produced unethically. The best solar panels balance quality and price.
What are the best brands of cheap solar panels?
For DIY installations of off-grid uses, Renogy produces and sells excellent solar panels that are around 100 watts. For residential applications, LONGi and Q Cell have the best reputation for affordable, high-quality solar panels.
The cost of solar panels has declined roughly 80% in the last decade, bolstering the technology's reputation as an affordable energy source like never before. Now that solar power has reached this cost-effective price point, customers and businesses looking to capitalize on the benefits of solar energy are flooding the market looking for cheap solar panels.
In this article, we'll discuss the most affordable solar panels available and whether it's better to save money upfront or invest in high-quality models. We'll also give recommendations for solar panels at the crossroads of affordability and efficiency, providing the best bang for your buck.
If you're looking for cheap solar panels, one way to find them is to get free quotes from multiple installation companies. By comparing pricing from a few local installers, you can make sure you're getting the best deal. To get started, fill out the simple form below.
Are Cheap Solar Panels Any Good?
The cheapest panels are typically manufactured in China (with the U.S. and Germany close behind), and some are cheap for a reason. They can come with underlying issues, most concerningly in the form of environmental and workers' rights violations in their production process.
Cheap solar panels also tend to be less durable and will likely come with a shorter lifespan. In fact, the cheapest upfront options sometimes end up being the most expensive in the long run. A good comparison is buying a car. Though the cheap initial cost of a beater may be the most tempting, frequent repairs, poor gas mileage and checkups can outweigh the initial savings within a few short years.
However, for those whose most important consideration is price, there are still some good options for cheap solar panels on the market today to turn your home into a renewable energy source.
Top 5 Cheap Solar Panels
Below are the five of the cheapest photovoltaic solar panels (that are rated at least 100W) on the market. Bear in mind that the current industry minimum for solar panels capable of powering a home is around 300W. Panels between 100W and 300W may be suitable for DIY solar projects, off-grid systems and charging things like portable generators or small appliances.
Note that prices and availability fluctuate with inventory, demand and supply chain issues. Prices change often when vendors have surplus supply, so sales are frequent. Customers will not be able to purchase some brands' panels directly, as they must be ordered from a distributor.
| Cheap Solar Panel | Price Per Panel | Power Rating | Price Per Watt | Efficiency Rating | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Renogy
100W 12 Volt Solar Panel |
$125 | 100W | $1.25 | 21% | 1-year materials warranty |
|
LONGi
#LR6-60-HPB-350M |
$225 | 350W | $0.60 | 20.3% | Limited 25-year warranty |
|
Canadian Solar
Model #CS1H-315MS |
$225 | 315W | $0.71 | 18.68% | 25-year output warranty |
|
Silfab Solar
- SIL-330 NL |
$250 | 330W | $0.76 | 17.3% | 12-year module warranty |
|
LONGi
#LR4-60-HPH-360M |
$260 | 360W | $0.72 | 19.8% | 25-year output warranty |
Cheap Vs. Affordable Solar Panels
There's a key distinction between cheap solar panels and the most affordable solar panels. Cheap considers only the price tag. Affordability involves factors beyond initial price, such as price per watt (aka bang for your buck), efficiency of the panel and warranty. A cheap solar panel isn't worth anything if it breaks without a warranty to replace it.
The cost of a solar panel is set by the manufacturer and involves a variety of factors, from cost of production to expected lifetime. Let's break down the factors that go into solar panel costs.
Solar Panel Efficiency
The greater a panel's efficiency, the more energy each solar cell's power output will be. Efficiency matters, as a homeowner will have to buy far fewer panels to meet their energy needs with higher-efficiency panels. The most solar efficient panels usually cost more to manufacture, raising their price point and total installed cost.
Solar Panel Power
The power, or wattage, of a solar panel reflects how many watts (W) of energy the panel is capable of generating when producing at maximum capacity. Most modern residential solar panels have power factors between 300 and 350W. As is true with high-efficiency panels, a customer needs to purchase fewer panels overall if they have a higher power output. While they'll typically have a greater upfront cost, high-output panels will provide better value over time.
Solar Panel Warranty
A warranty is simple to understand, yet no less important to consider. Bearing in mind that the average lifetime of a solar panel system is about 25 years, warranties are essential in ensuring reliable energy output. Though solar panels are very durable, a lot can happen over 25 years. Falling tree branches can crack a panel, rooftop critters can chew up wiring and untreated water damage can corrode a system. Some of the cheapest panels will come with the worst warranties, and costs can add up quickly if a solar power system runs into trouble.
Solar Panel Quality
Similar to solar panel efficiency and power, the cost of a solar panel has much to do with its quality. The cheapest solar panels on the market will be of the poorest quality, making them far more prone to breaks, issues and quick aging. The higher the quality of the parts in a solar panel, the more expensive it becomes. However, this is just another time when "cheap" panels are far from the most affordable solar panels in the long run.
5 Best Value Solar Panels
With all this in mind, below are our recommendations for the most affordable home solar panels on the market in 2021.
|
Most Affordable Solar Panel |
Price Per Panel | Power Rating | Price Per Watt | Efficiency Rating | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LONGi
#LR6-60-HPB-350M |
$225 | 350W | $0.60 | 20.3% | Limited 25-year warranty |
|
Hanwha Q Cell
340W Q.PEAK DUO |
$240 | 340W | $0.70 | 19% | 25-year warranty |
|
Canadian Solar
Model #CS1H-315MS |
$225 | 315W | $0.71 | 18.68% | 25-year output warranty |
|
LONGi
#LR4-60-HPH-360M |
$260 | 360W | $0.72 | 19.8% | 25-year output warranty |
|
JA Solar Technology
JAM60S10 -340/MR |
$240 | 330W | $0.73 | 20.2% | 25-year output warranty |
LONGi and Q Cell are two of the most affordable solar brands that maintain reputations for good quality at a low price. As you can see, they both provide exceptional price per watt and efficiency without sacrificing warranty.
A solar installation with low price per watt and high efficiency provides a number of benefits for a solar customer. With more power and efficiency per panel, a homeowner won't need to purchase as many panels to meet their household energy needs.
FAQ: Cheap Solar Panels
What kind of solar panels are the cheapest?
Polycrystalline solar panels tend to be cheaper (and lower quality) than monocrystalline panels. You can read more about the difference between these types of panels in our monocrystalline vs. polycrystalline solar panel review.
What is the cheapest way to get solar panels?
The cheapest way to acquire solar panels is to purchase them through a distributor in bulk. Though one can save a significant amount of money purchasing and installing solar panels on their own, solar companies can access a wider range of products and get them for lower prices than what's available to the general public.
Should I buy cheap solar panels?
There are many excellent affordable options for solar panels due to the rapid advancement of the technology and industry behind them. There are also a great number of cheap panels that are unreliable, break easily and are likely produced unethically. The best solar panels balance quality and price.
What are the best brands of cheap solar panels?
For DIY installations of off-grid uses, Renogy produces and sells excellent solar panels that are around 100 watts. For residential applications, LONGi and Q Cell have the best reputation for affordable, high-quality solar panels.
Canada's northernmost capital has declared a local state of emergency because of suspected gasoline contamination in the water supply.
Residents of Iqaluit, the capital of the Arctic territory of Nunavut, have been warned not to drink, boil or cook with the city's water.
"Due to the possibility of petroleum hydrocarbons at the Iqaluit water treatment plant, the Department of Health is advising Iqalummiut not to consume tap water for drinking or cooking, until further notice," the territory's government wrote in a public health advisory published Tuesday.
https://t.co/3hdvDvzWfl— Government of Nunavut (@Government of Nunavut) 1634076488.0
An investigation into the city's water supply began late last week, when residents complained that their tap water smelled like gasoline, The Guardian reported. At first, tests suggested the water was safe. But a more recent test conducted in Ottawa turned up evidence of microbes in the water.
In a city council meeting Tuesday evening, chief administrative officer Amy Elgersma also said that staff had located "concentrated odors" in the city's water treatment plant, CBC News reported.
"We suspect there is some type of petroleum product that has entered the water system," Elgersma said at the meeting.
Samples from the treatment plant have been sent in for testing, and results should be due in five business days.
The health advisory said that the city's tap water could be used for laundry, cleaning and showers. However, pregnant women, newborns and infants should not bathe in the water, and it should not be added to infant formulae.
Iqaluit Mayor Kenny Bell further warned that all residents were impacted, no matter how they received their water.
"It's everything. Any treated water," Bell told Nunatsiaq News.
This means the city's more than 7,000 residents will all need alternative water sources, CBC News noted.
This is occurring in a remote area where food and bottled water costs are extremely high, The Guardian reported. A liter bottle of water costs around $7.25 and a pack of a dozen smaller bottles costs $24.
"It is extremely expensive, everything is extremely expensive here," Bell told CBC North, as The Guardian reported. "Right now, we're in limbo because there is not enough jugs to fill with water to give to people."
The city had set up two water distribution points Tuesday with water from the Sylvia Grinnell River, Nunatsiaq News reported. However, residents are required to bring their own jugs.
The territory is also planning to fly in 80,000 liters (approximately 21,133.8 liquid gallons) of water over the next three days, and to bypass the potentially contaminated tank to restore the city's normal water supply, The Guardian reported.
- Bottled Water, Brought to You by Fracking? - EcoWatch ›
- Kinder Morgan Pipeline Spills up to 42,000 Gallons of Gasoline Into ... ›
The Interior Department will sell offshore wind leases off both coasts and the Gulf of Mexico by 2025, the Biden administration announced Wednesday.
The seven lease sales are part of Biden's plan to generate 30 gigawatts of offshore wind energy in the next nine years and could create up to 77,000 jobs — the U.S. currently generates just 2MW of offshore wind energy.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, a division of DOI, officially approved the 800MW Vineyard Wind project earlier this year and has nine additional projects currently under review.
Filling those 77,000 jobs will be a massive undertaking but Billy Vietze and his union are ready. "Everybody knows there's a finite amount of fossil fuels, and burning it is no good for our environment," Vietze, currently training to work on the Vineyard Wind project, told E&E news. "This is reliable, clean, renewable energy that can help support our country as we go on and provide a good future for our kids."
For a deeper dive:
AP, The New York Times, The Hill, Reuters, Reuters; Workers: E&E News and NPR
For more climate change and clean energy news, you can follow Climate Nexus on Twitter and Facebook, sign up for daily Hot News, and visit their news site, Nexus Media News.
- Domestic Legislating Carries COP26 Implications for Biden ... ›
- Biden Admin Advances First Major US Offshore Wind Farm - EcoWatch ›
Clean energy is growing faster than ever before, but fossil fuel demand — and climate pollution — is also growing and the world's nations must dramatically increase both their ambition and execution in order to meet the targets set out in the Paris agreement, according to the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook released Wednesday.
At the current pace, aggregate global climate pollution cuts will only reach 40% by 2050 — scientists agree net emissions must be cut by 100% by 2050 to avoid the worst and most cataclysmic impacts of climate change.
As reported by The Guardian:
Despite the IEA's warnings about inadequate progress towards net zero, the organisation – set up by major economies in the wake of the 1973 oil crisis – said much of the extra investment required to reach the target could be done relatively easily.
More than 40% of the required reduction in emissions could come from measures that "pay for themselves", the IEA said, such as improving efficiency, limiting gas leakage, or installing wind or solar in places where they are already cheap and efficient.
The IEA also pointed to the potential economic opportunities of net zero. It said existing pledges to reduce emissions would create 13m jobs but that stepping up the measures to meet the target would double that figure.
The required investment would create a market for wind turbines, solar panels, lithium-ion batteries, electrolysers and fuel cells of well over $1tn a year, comparable with the current oil market, it said.
For a deeper dive:
Energy Transition: TIME, Reuters, The Verge, The Wall Street Journal, Washington Examiner; Emissions: The Guardian, Axios, Thomson Reuters Foundation, The Hill, The Wall Street Journal, Axios
For more climate change and clean energy news, you can follow Climate Nexus on Twitter and Facebook, sign up for daily Hot News, and visit their news site, Nexus Media News.
- Offshore Wind Power Could Produce More Electricity Than World ... ›
- Renewables were the world's cheapest source of energy in 2020 ›
Kunming Declaration: Nature Defenders Warn Global Biodiversity Pledge Lacks Urgency
While welcoming a pledge by more than 100 countries to make "transformative change," conservationists say governments must turn "words into reality."
By Jessica Corbett
More than 100 countries on Wednesday concluded a round of negotiations on global efforts to restore and protect the variety of life on Earth by pledging "urgent and integrated action" to achieve "transformative change, across all sectors of the economy and all parts of society."
While conservation advocacy groups worldwide welcomed the "Kunming Declaration" on biodiversity, they also made clear that its 17 specific commitments must be met with immediate, bold, and concrete steps to fully address the existential crisis the natural world now faces from human activity.
The pledge came out of a United Nations conference in Kunming, China that was attended in person and remotely—due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, which has underscored the need to reform humanity's relationship with nature—by parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), an international treaty ratified by nearly all U.N. member nations, but not the United States.
The new declaration recognizes that "putting biodiversity on a path to recovery is a defining challenge of this decade" and the "strong political momentum" required to develop, adopt, and implement an ambitious post-2020 global biodiversity framework, which governments are set to negotiate further in January 2022 then approve at a May meeting in China.
An Lambrechts, a senior campaign strategist at Greenpeace International, was critical of the pledge, noting the unprecedented nature of the current crisis and warning that "vague commitments that lack accountability are hardly a step forward" from 2010 biodiversity targets that the international community failed to meet.
"The Kunming Declaration could have provided a major boost to the slow-moving U.N. biodiversity negotiations. It offers a preview of what's to come in 2022 and makes modest attempts in some areas, but doesn't show enough progress on most of the contentious issues," Lambrechts said. "Ambition urgently needs to ramp up from here before the spring 2022 session."
The campaigner highlighted the "critical" importance of implementation strategies for goals such as 30x30 — or protecting at least 30% of land and marine areas by 2030—and emphasized that "targets must recognize the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities, and their key role in the preservation of nature and biodiversity."
Adoption of Kunming Declaration at at the High-Level Segment of the 1st part of @UNBiodiversity #COP15 builds hope… https://t.co/kbmyqlyN6V— UN News (@UN News) 1634145000.0
Lin Li, director of global policy and advocacy at World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) said the declaration "is a show of political will and adds much-needed momentum by clearly signaling the direction of travel to address biodiversity loss," but "its impacts will lie in how it is put into action" and "it is still critical for governments to turn these words into reality.
"In Kunming next May, this declaration must be turned into an action plan for nature which not only protects land, freshwater and seas, but also fundamentally addresses our unsustainable agricultural system, embraces nature-based solutions, ensures adequate funding and is robustly implemented," the WWF leader said.
"The world is waking up to the fact that the nature crisis is as serious as the climate crisis, but unfortunately this is not happening fast enough," she added. "Biodiversity loss is threatening human health and livelihoods, and increasing the risk of the next pandemic, yet leaders' pledges are yet to be translated into ambition in the negotiation room. Now is the time to step up."
Elizabeth Maruma Mrema, executive secretary of the CBD, struck an optimistic tone in a statement Wednesday, saying that "the adoption of the Kunming Declaration is a clear indication of the worldwide support for the level of ambition that needs to be reflected in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework to be finalized next spring in Kunming."
Mrema also recognized Chinese President Xi Jinping's announcement Tuesday that his nation is committing about $230 million U.S. dollars to establish the Kunming Biodiversity Fund, and said she looks forward to more financial and technical commitments in support of the framework.
Li Shuo, global policy adviser at Greenpeace East Asia, said the Kunming Declaration "gives us a hint on China's leadership style" and that the country's new "commitment to fund biodiversity protection at a larger scale could be the impetus others need to direct finance towards protecting biodiversity."
"But much remains to be seen on whether Beijing can spearhead a delicate multilateral process," Li added. "The contrast between China's ambitious domestic agenda and its modest diplomatic approach is striking. It's time to bridge that gap."
Reposted with permission from Common Dreams.
The Tesla Powerwall is arguably the best-known solar battery for homes, but does it live up to the hype? In this Tesla Powerwall review, we'll discuss the main features of this popular energy storage system and compare it with some competing battery backup devices.
What Is the Tesla Powerwall, and How Does it Work?
The Tesla Powerwall is a lithium-ion battery that's most often associated with storing energy generated by Tesla solar panels. However, you can actually charge these batteries with any electricity source to use as a backup during a power outage. You can also connect up to 10 Powerwall units as a single energy storage system, making them viable for small and medium businesses as well as homes.
You can currently purchase a Tesla Powerwall 2 or Powerwall+. The Powerwall 1 has been discontinued since 2016, but the newer versions are much better products: a single Powerwall 2 or Powerwall+ can store 13.5 kilowatt-hours of power, while the Powerwall 1 only had 6.4 kWh of usable capacity. The newer versions also have a higher power output (5.6 kW vs 3.3 kW), which means they can provide electricity for more devices at once.
The Powerwall 2 and Powerwall+ have the same storage capacity, but the Powerwall+ includes an inverter for easier integration with solar PV panels. The Powerwall+ can also deliver more kilowatts when panels are in full sunshine, while the Powerwall 2 offers the same output regardless of solar generation.
Here's a summary of Tesla Powerwall output:
- Originally, the Powerwall 2 offered 5 kW of continuous power and 7 kW of peak power.
- The Powerwall+ and later versions of the Powerwall 2 have 5.8 kW of continuous power and 10 kW of peak power.
- When solar panels are under full sunshine, the Powerwall+ reaches 7.6 kW of continuous power and 22 kW of peak power.
If you already have a home solar energy system with its own inverter, the Powerwall 2 is a great option to add energy storage without modifications. However, the Powerwall+ is easier to install with new solar panels, since there is no need to add a separate inverter. In this article, we refer to the Tesla Powerwall 2 as simply the Powerwall, since the first version is no longer available.
How Powerwall Batteries Work
All batteries store DC (direct current) power, and solar panels produce DC power. But home appliances use AC (alternating current) power. This is where inverters and rectifiers come into play.
When solar panels produce DC power, it runs through an inverter, where it's converted to AC, then flows through your house. If you have a backup power system, excess energy that's not used in the home will keep flowing to charge your battery. It will need to run through a rectifier to be converted back to DC power in order to be stored in the battery.
The Powerwall 2 and Powerwall+ both have an internal inverter and rectifier to convert electricity between AC and DC. The inverter in the Powerwall 2 is only for the battery, and an external inverter is required for solar panels. On the other hand, the Powerwall+ includes a solar inverter. Both models can also charge from the grid when solar panels are not producing electricity.
The energy stored in a Tesla Powerwall can be used at any time. However, there are certain times of the day when stored electricity is more valuable. For example, many electricity providers charge expensive peak tariffs after sunset, when homes tend to use more power. By pulling from your Powerwall instead of the grid at this time of the day, you can maximize your electricity savings.
The number of solar panels needed to fully charge a Tesla Powerwall will depend on how much sunshine you get. Consider that the Powerwall has a 90% round-trip efficiency when charging and discharging — to get the usable capacity of 13.5 kWh, you must have 15 kWh available from your solar panels.
Here's how that breaks down in a typical solar panel system:
- Assuming a solar panel capacity of 330 to 360 watts, you will need around 10 to 14 panels to generate 15 kWh of usable energy per day.
- The exact number of solar panels needed to charge a Tesla Powerwall will depend on the specific model and local sunshine conditions.
Keep in mind that your home uses some solar electricity during the day, while the Powerwall is charging. You must have enough solar panels to cover your daytime consumption and charge the battery as well.
Tesla Powerwall Specs
The Tesla Powerwall has some of the best specifications in the home battery market. There are many energy storage systems with excellent performance, but the Powerwall is among the top products in terms of storage capacity and power output.
This is in part because the batteries use a lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide chemistry, or NMC for short. Lithium-ion batteries with NMC technology are characterized by their high power and storage capacity relative to their size.
Here's a snapshot of key Tesla Powerwall specs:
- Energy storage capacity: 13.5 kWh
- Continuous power: 5.8 kW (5 kW on earlier Powerwall 2 units)
- Peak power: 10 kW (7 kW on earlier Powerwall 2 units)
- Size: 45.3 in x 29.6 in x 5.75 in
- Weight: 251.3 pounds
- Operating temperature range: -4°F to 122°F
- Warranty: 10 years
If you have a Powerwall+ connected to solar panels or solar roof shingles, it can achieve a higher output with full sunshine. The Powerwall+ is also larger and heavier than the standard unit since it includes a solar inverter:
- Energy storage capacity: 13.5 kWh
- Continuous power with no sun: 5.8 kW
- Peak power with no sun: 10 kW
- Continuous power with full sun: 7.6 kW
- Peak power with full sun: 22 kW
- Size: 62.8 in x 29.7 in x 6.3 in
- Weight: 343.9 pounds
- Operating temperature range: -4°F to 122°F
- Warranty: 10 years
The solar inverter on the Powerwall+ has an efficiency of 97.5% and four Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT) circuits. This means you can group solar panels with up to four different orientations and connect each group to a different MPPT circuit to maximize power generation.

Tesla Powerwall Cost
The Tesla Powerwall has a higher price than many other battery systems, but you also get a high storage capacity and power output. The price is calculated based on how many units you order: a single Powerwall sells for $10,500, but two units will cost $17,000 ($8,500 each). They can be purchased directly from Tesla, but you can also get them from third-party providers and solar installers near you.
Powerwalls and other battery systems qualify for the 26% federal solar tax credit, which effectively reduces the price of a single unit to $7,770 (down from $10,500). However, you must meet some requirements to be eligible:
- The Powerwall must be used with solar panels (or another renewable energy system) to get credit. In other words, a stand-alone unit that only pulls charge from the grid does not qualify.
- If you're using the Powerwall in a home, it must get 100% of its charge from solar panels.
- If you're using it in a business, it must get at least 75% of its charge from solar panels.
Depending on where you live, there may be additional solar tax exemptions or other financial incentives from your state government or utility company. Before installing a Tesla Powerwall, look for information about local incentives and their eligibility requirements.
If you're interested in buying a Powerwall, there are a few additional things to keep in mind:
- Since the Powerwall has become very popular, there are often long wait times to get products in after ordering them.
- Tesla is no longer selling Powerwalls individually — they can only be purchased with new solar roof shingle or panel installations.
- If you want to add a Powerwall to an existing solar array, or you want to use solar panels and inverters from another manufacturer, you will need to contact a third-party provider.
Many top solar companies are authorized Tesla Powerwall retailers. To connect with a certified installer near you and get a free quote for a Powerwall or other installation, fill out the 30-second form below.
Is Tesla's Battery Really Better Than Competitors' Products?
Without a doubt, the Tesla Powerwall is ahead of the competition in terms of market share, and Tesla Powerwall reviews from customers consistently give the batteries high marks. However, when you compare technical specifications, there are many home batteries with excellent performance out there.
Here's how two other market-leading batteries — the Enphase Encharge 10 and the Generac PWRcell — stack up against the Powerwall:
| Tesla Powerwall | Enphase Encharge 10* | Generac PWRcell | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $10,500 |
$18,000+
($6,000+ for a single Enphase 3) |
$9,999+
(modular design, price increases based on capacity) |
| Storage Capacity | 13.5 kWh |
10.08 kWh
(3.36 kWh with a single Enphase 3) |
9+ kWh |
| Continuous Power | 5.6 kW |
3.84 kW
(1.28 kW with a single Enphase 3) |
3.4+ kW |
| Warranty | 10 years | 10 years | 10 years |
| Size | 45.3 x 29.6 x 5.75 in | 42.13 x 26.14 x 12.56 in | 22 x 10 x 68 in |
| Weight | 251.3 pounds | 341 pounds | 287+ pounds |
| Monitoring | Tesla app | Enlighten Manager and MyEnlighten app | PWRview app |
*The Encharge 10 is an integrated AC system that uses three smaller Enphase 3 units.
As you can see, the Powerwall's storage capacity and continuous power output beat out the competition, as does its straightforward pricing. Lower-end batteries may save you money in the short term, but over the lifetime of your solar system, you'd be hard-pressed to find a model as cost-effective as the Powerwall.
FAQ: Tesla Powerwall
How much does a Tesla Powerwall cost?
A single Tesla Powerwall has a price of $10,500. The system price increases based on how many units are connected together (up to 10), and the price per Powerwall is lower when installing two or more.
Can a Tesla Powerwall power a home?
Yes, a Tesla Powerwall can power a home during a short-term blackout or overnight, but you will normally achieve a better return on investment by staying connected to the grid.
An on-grid Powerwall with solar panels can greatly reduce your electricity bills, covering a large part of your consumption during the day and night and pulling from your utility grid if you need more power. However, if you're planning to go off-grid, you'll need at least two (but most likely more) Powerwalls to power your home continuously when the sun isn't shining.
How long does a Tesla Powerwall last?
The Tesla Powerwall comes with a 10-year warranty, which ensures the battery will keep at least 70% of its rated storage capacity after 10 years (equivalent to 9.45 kWh). When used only for solar self-consumption and backup, the Powerwall warranty does not have a cycle limit during the warranty period.
When the Powerwall is used for other applications beyond solar self-consumption and backup, the warranty covers a battery throughput of 37.8 megawatt-hours. In other words, the warranty ends when the battery has stored and provided a total of 37,800 kWh.
Will a Tesla Powerwall save me money?
A standalone Powerwall can save money if your electricity provider charges time-of-use prices. You can charge the Powerwall when grid electricity is cheap, and you can use it when grid electricity is expensive. If your utility company has demand charges, you can also use the Powerwall to cut the peak demand measured by the power meter, and this will be reflected as a lower demand charge on your next bill.
A Powerwall with solar panels or roof shingles can achieve greater savings, as it charges locally with solar power. Instead of exporting your surplus generation to the grid, you can store that energy in the Powerwall and use it when its value is higher. Like in the previous case, you can use the Powerwall to avoid peak tariffs or reduce demand charges.
Leonardo David is an electromechanical engineer, MBA, energy consultant and technical writer. His energy-efficiency and solar consulting experience covers sectors including banking, textile manufacturing, plastics processing, pharmaceutics, education, food processing, fast food, real estate and retail. He has also been writing articles about energy and engineering topics since 2015.
Where Does PFAS Pollution Come From? New Study Identifies Nearly 42,000 Potential Sources
Is your drinking water contaminated with toxic forever chemicals?
A new study published in a special issue of the American Water Works Association Water Science journal Tuesday found that there were nearly 42,000 potential sources of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pollution that could contaminate surface water or drinking water in the U.S.
"It is critical that the EPA start regulating PFAS – now," lead study author and Environmental Working Group (EWG) senior scientist David Andrews, Ph.D. said in a press release announcing the research. "Every community in the U.S. is likely affected by PFAS contamination, but those living near or downstream from industrial facilities may be more at risk."
PFAS are a class of chemicals often used in stain or water repellents, non-stick products and firefighting foam, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). They are known as forever chemicals because they do not break down over time and tend to persist and accumulate in the environment and the human body. They are also constantly turning up in more and more locations, from rain, to cosmetics to the air we breathe.
The new study, which was conducted by EWG scientists, looked at potential sources of PFAS contamination based on public data from the EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online database. It found that the most common potential pollution sources were solid waste landfills, wastewater treatment plants, oil refineries and electroplaters and metal finishers.
The new research also looked at case studies from Michigan and California, in which testing revealed a wide range of PFAS sources.
"The results from states like Michigan show there is a wide variety of sources of PFAS in surface water," Andrews said in the EWG release. "Many landfills and industrial sites release PFAS at detectable concentrations that may exceed state limits or health guidelines for PFAS in water."
There is currently no national limit for PFAS contamination in water, according to the study authors, though the EPA says it is currently working on setting one. In the meantime, six states have set their own limits. However, research is continually showing health impacts from PFAS at lower and lower levels.
"For example, state guidelines for exposure to PFOA have decreased approximately three orders of magnitude from 7000 ng/L [nanograms per liter], set by Minnesota in 2002, to 8 ng/L, set by Michigan in 2020," the study authors wrote.
Still, the latest research puts the safe concentration even lower, at 1 ng/L. Drinking PFAS-contaminated water at even low levels has been linked with health risks including immune suppression, cancer and reproductive or developmental problems, according to the EWG release.
In response to the study results, EWG called for greater industry and government action on PFAS.
"We need to turn off the tap of PFAS pollution from these industrial discharges, which affects more and more Americans every day. That's the first step," Scott Faber, EWG's senior vice president for government affairs, said in the press release. "The second step is for the EPA to set a national PFAS drinking water standard. And the third is to clean up legacy pollution."
The study authors thought that it would be possible to reduce PFAS in the U.S. water supply by rigorously testing drinking and surface water, as well as the emissions from potential sources of PFAS pollution.
The report, a collaboration of ClimateVoice and InfluenceMap found none of the top 20 "climate positive" companies have endorsed the climate policies of the Build Back Better Act, supported its revenue raising provisions, and opposed lobbying against the bill by trade associations; 12 met none of those requirements. Those companies — 3M, Cisco Systems, Coca-Cola, Google, HP, Johnson & Johnson, McDonald's, Nike, PepsiCo, Pfizer, Qualcomm, and Tesla — are "missing the moment," the report said. "This is our shot at national policy," ClimateVoice founder Bill Weihl told Grist. If these companies don't step up, "they are going to be held to account for years to come."
As reported by Grist:
The White House and progressive senators say the Build Back Better Act is the nation's best chance of mitigating future climate change-related suffering and costs, which promise to be astronomically higher than the upfront cost of reducing emissions now. But the bill, which contains funding for various green initiatives, tax credits for clean energy, and a program that would slash roughly 80 percent of the emissions from the electricity sector by the end of this decade, is on the rocks. Democrats can't decide amongst themselves how much to spend on the package or even exactly which programs should be included in it. If the climate portion gets declawed or cut entirely, the left may not get another opportunity to pass climate policy for a very long time.
For a deeper dive:
For more climate change and clean energy news, you can follow Climate Nexus on Twitter and Facebook, sign up for daily Hot News, and visit their news site, Nexus Media News.
- Climate Polluters Are Greenwashing Sports Sponsorships - EcoWatch ›
- Biden Urged to Take 10 Immediate Steps to Address Climate Crisis ... ›
- Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Disney Among Major Corporations Lying ... ›
Hurricane Ida's storm surge left the multiple-ton vaults strewn around the town, "like they were cardboard boxes," Rev. Haywood Johnson Jr. told the AP. The lingering coffins are a visceral illustration of the trauma and abandonment of small communities like Ironton after the massive storm. "Once you bury a relative, you expect that to be the permanent resting place," Rev. Johnson lamented.
Louisiana recovering the dead after Hurricane Ida. youtu.be
As reported by The Associated Press:
Families sometimes strap down graves or use sandbags to keep them in place ahead of a storm, said Arbie Goings, a task force member who is also a retired funeral director. When they do get displaced, identifying remains can be challenging, especially in cases of long dead people with fewer, if any, ways to match things like dental records or DNA.
Some caskets have a little plastic tube — called a memory tube — screwed into its end where a funeral home can put identifying information, Goings said. In some cases, they've found the name at the foot of the casket or embroidered into a piece of cloth covering the bottom part of the person, he said.
Often family members can give key identifying details. He recalled one case where they identified a woman's remains by the marbles her grandchildren put in her casket in honor of her love of the game.

For a deeper dive:
AP; Climate Signals background: 2021 Atlantic hurricane season, Storm surge increase
For more climate change and clean energy news, you can follow Climate Nexus on Twitter and Facebook, sign up for daily Hot News, and visit their news site, Nexus Media News.
- Hurricane Ida Continues to Impact Louisiana Students and Schools ... ›
- Rooftop Solar Systems Fared Better Than Big Energy Companies in ... ›
Greta Thunberg Is 'Open' to Meeting Biden at the UN Climate Summit
In the lead-up to COP26, the Swedish activist talked about Biden's climate plan, the media's responsibility, and what gives her hope.
By Mark Hertsgaard
This story originally appeared in The Nation and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global media collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. The interview with Greta Thunberg was conducted by CCNow partners NBC News, Reuters, and The Nation.
Greta Thunberg is "open" to meeting with United States President Joe Biden at the United Nations climate summit in Glasgow, though the young Swedish activist does not expect much from either the US leader or the make-or-break summit that runs October 31 to November 12.
In an interview with the global media collaboration Covering Climate Now last Wednesday, Thunberg expressed surprise at the idea that Biden, or any world leader, might want to sit down with her at COP26, but said she was open to the possibility, if asked. "I guess that will depend on the situation," she said. "I don't see why these people want to meet with me, but yeah."
A week before she entertained the question about whether she would meet with Biden, Thunberg had accused the US president and other world leaders of offering pretty words but no real action on climate, only "blah blah blah," in a speech to the Youth4Climate summit. That September 28 clip went viral. In the CCNow interview, conducted by NBC News, Reuters, and The Nation, she complained that youth climate activists "are not being taken seriously" by world leaders. "They're just saying, 'We listen to you,' and then they applaud us, and then they go on just like before."
The suggestion that Biden has not only spoken strongly about the climate crisis but is also trying to pass the most ambitious climate legislation in US history does not impress Thunberg. The climate measures in the Democrats' spending plan now under ferocious negotiation in Washington have "been so much watered down by lobbyists," she said; "so we should not pretend that this would be a solution to the climate crisis." Biden's political problem—that as president in a democracy, he shares power with a legislative body where he faces unanimous Republican opposition that is determined to block his agenda—does not interest her. She judges by results only: "Emissions are still going up."
The notion of meeting with the president of the world's other climate change superpower, Xi Jinping of China, seemed even more distant to Thunberg than a meeting with Biden. Calling Xi "a leader of a dictatorship," she nevertheless did not rule out the idea. She stressed, however, that "democracy is the only solution to the climate crisis, since the only thing that could get us out of this situation is…massive public pressure."
Wearing a grey hoodie and speaking from her kitchen table in Stockholm, Thunberg said that she will attend November's COP26 despite the summit's potential for "empty talk" and "greenwashing" because the gathering of thousands of government officials, activists, scientists, and journalists is an opportunity "to show that we are in an emergency, and…we are going to try to mobilize people around this."
"In such an emergency as we are in right now, everyone needs to take their moral responsibility, at least I think so, and use whatever power they have, whatever platform they have, to try to influence and push in the right direction, to make a change," she said. "I think that's our duty as human beings."
Making COP26 a success, Thunberg suggested, requires unflinching honesty about "the gap between what we are saying and what we are actually doing.… That's not what we are doing now. We are trying to find concrete, small solutions that are symbolic in order to make it seem like we are doing something, without actually confronting the problem at all. We are still not counting all the emissions when we are announcing targets. We are still using creative accounting when it comes to emissions cuts, and so on. As long as that's the case, we will not get very far."
Thunberg endorsed the many lawsuits demanding compensation from fossil fuel companies for their decades of lying about climate change and the resulting damage and suffering, especially in frontline communities. "I think that these people need to be held accountable for all the damage that they have caused…especially for the people whose communities and whose health and livelihoods have been devastated by the actions of these companies," she said. "I think that's the bare minimum to ask for."
The activist also called out the world's media, which she said has largely "failed…to communicate the emergency that we are in." She noted that "there are many, many news organizations and journalists that are trying" to do more, and she called the media "one of my biggest sources of hope right now." Citing the coronavirus, she said that "when the media decided to treat this pandemic as an emergency, that changed social norms overnight. If the media decided, with all the resources that they have, to use their platform…they could reach countless people in no time, and that could have huge consequences, positive consequences."
Thunberg's core message has been consistent from the time she first emerged on the world stage with a fiery denunciation of global elites at the World Economic Forum in Davos in January of 2019: Listen to the science and do what it requires; the science says our planetary house is literally on fire, and world leaders and everyone else should act like it.
The fact that world leaders, by her own account, are not doing what she and millions of activists are demanding has not led her and other movement leaders to consider new strategies and tactics, at least not yet. "Right now, we are just repeating the same message, like a broken record," she said. "And we are going out on the streets because you need to repeat the same message…until people get it. I guess that's the only option that we have. If we find other ways of doing it in the future that work better, then maybe we will shift."
Thunberg emphasized that she sees "many, many bright spots" in the climate emergency, citing the millions of people around the world who are taking action. "When I'm taking action, I don't feel like I am helpless and that things are hopeless, because then I feel like I'm doing everything I can," she said. "And that gives me very much hope, especially to see all the other people all around the world, the activists, who are taking action and who are fighting for their present and for their future."
Asked where she sees herself, and humanity, 10 years from now, Greta Thunberg smiled and said, "I have no idea. I think as long as I'm doing everything I can, as long as we are doing everything we can, we can just live in the moment and try to change the future while we still can, instead of trying to predict the future."
Mark Hertsgaard is the executive director of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism initiative committed to more and better coverage of the climate story. He is also the environment correspondent for The Nation and author of books including HOT: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth.