9 Climate-Denying Republicans Who Might Run for President
With Texas Sen. Ted Cruz announcing his candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination this week, political watchers are waiting with bated breath for the next shoe to drop—that is, the next candidate to announce his run. And while no announcements seem to be immediately on the horizon, other than possibly that of non-serious candidate Donald Trump who said last week he's forming an exploratory committee, it might be time to look at where the other candidates stand on climate change and other environmental issues.
Guessing who might be a frontrunner a year from now—or even a month from now—in such a crowded field is a thankless game, especially with no formal announcements. But former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is collecting money hand over fist, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Brown attracted some favorable attention at a recent summit in the key primary state of Iowa, and both former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and ex-Texas Gov. Rick Perry have made it obvious they'd be open to a second run (both were candidates in 2012).
There's also New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, once considered an easy frontrunner but now damaged by home-state scandals. There's Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and for those hungry for a new name to specular about, Ohio Gov. John Kasich who's indicated his openness to a run by traveling to another critical primary state, New Hampshire, when he should be back home doing something about his state's lagging economy.
Assessing the climate positions of so many candidates isn't as hard as you'd think—virtually all are climate deniers, although many haven't made it a major cornerstone of their public utterances. And there's good reason: with the fossil fuel multibillionaire Koch Brothers having vowed to spend close to a billion dollars putting a Republican in the White House in 2016, all the candidates are eying that cash covetously. And the attached string is having positions that are unwaveringly anti-environmental and pro unlimited fossil fuel development.
So we saw Monday when Cruz announced that he touted oil and gas development as a cornerstone of his campaign. But he's not the only one.
Bush said in an interview in 2011, "It is not unanimous among scientists that [climate change] is disproportionately manmade. What I get a little tired of on the left is this idea that somehow science has decided all this so you can’t have a view."
Yet one of his backers is pushing him to separate himself from the deniers, according to the Wall Street Journal. Andrew Sabin, who owns a precious-metals refining business, told the paper, "I want him to be the next Teddy Roosevelt. We want to show that conservation is conservative and get Republicans back to their environmental roots without hurting jobs."
In response, a Bush spokesperson said, "He believes the climate is changing but research is less conclusive on the extent to which humans contribute,” Ms. Campbell said. “He does not believe alarmist, far-left environmental policies are the answer.”
Walker has been getting heat in the last few days as it's come out during an ongoing probe of his private emails that he received $1.5 million in "dark" money from billionaire John Menard Jr. One of Menard's top priorities was reining in enforcement by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources such as the $1.7 million in fines against both Menard and his company for violating state environmental laws, and the Walker administration has obliged.
And Walker revealed his fealty to the Koch brothers when he was punked back in 2011 by activist journalist Ian Murphy, who called him and pretended to be David Koch. In the call, Walker spilled his guts about his contempt for the public workers staging massive protests at the state capitol in response to Walker's drive to eliminate bargaining rights. "Well, I’ll tell you what, Scott, once you crush these bastards, I’ll fly you out to Cali and really show you a good time," "Koch" tells Walker, who responds, "That would be outstanding. Thanks for all the support in helping us to move the cause forward."
Photo credit: Shutterstock
Then there's Trump, whom no one takes seriously as a candidate except himself. He's busy giving the birther treatment to Cruz, claiming his having been born in Canada—to a U.S. Citizen mother—might prohibit him from running for President. (It doesn't).
Donald Trump questions if Ted Cruz can run for President http://t.co/DGeq2WqvSV via @dailykos/ CRUZ IS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN & CAN NOT RUN!!!!
— Michael (@Mikew1767) March 25, 2015
His climate positions are no more reality-based. Last winter, he posted a string of tweets saying things like, "Any and all weather events are used by the GLOBAL WARMING HOAXSTERS to justify higher taxes to save our planet! They don't believe it $$$$!" and "NBC News just called it the great freeze—coldest weather in years. Is our country still spending money on the GLOBAL WARMING HOAX?"
This very expensive GLOBAL WARMING bullshit has got to stop. Our planet is freezing, record low temps,and our GW scientists are stuck in ice — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 2, 2014
Apparently, the tome The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future, written by Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, now chairman of the Senate Environment Committee, is required reading for GOP presidential candidates.
There's one long-shot hopeful who appears to be trying to position himself as the voice of sanity in the field, hoping apparently that the hardcore GOP base will do a 180 and be looking for that. Sen. Lindsey Graham has said, "I think there will be a political problem for the Republican Party going into 2016 if we don’t define what we are for the environment. I don’t know what the environmental policy of the Republican Party is."
It seems like some of his fellow party members have made it pretty clear.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
By Gudrun Heise
Just as scientists are scoring successes in coronavirus research, new problems are on their way. Fall is with us and winter is around the corner, so the season for colds and flu has begun — joining COVID-19.
Influenza Vaccination<p>A flu vaccination may thus be able to narrow down the diagnostic options when flu-like symptoms occur, but whether such a vaccination also has an influence on the behavior of the dangerous new virus is — like so much else — not clear. "It is conceivable that there is an indirect effect. But it is, I believe, a matter of speculation whether it has an immunological effect in the narrower sense," says Krause.</p><p>Every winter, doctors' waiting rooms are full of people who are coughing and sniffing but who mostly turn out to have only a severe respiratory infection. According to current knowledge, the virus that causes COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, is also likely to be subject to seasonal fluctuations. </p><p>In winter, cold viruses, at least, flourish because cold and dry air offers ideal conditions for their spread. In addition, it becomes more difficult to air rooms regularly and intensively — an important further measure to counteract the coronavirus and contain to some extent the danger posed by aerosols.</p><p>According to the <a href="https://www.rki.de/DE/Home/homepage_node.html" target="_blank">Robert Koch Institute, Germany's public health agency</a>, between 5% and 20% of people in Germany become infected with flu viruses every year. These viruses are also dangerous and can be fatal. The flu vaccination must be adapted to the influenza viruses every year, because they mutate. But at least there is a vaccination.</p><p>Most experts agree that there is unlikely to be a vaccine against the coronavirus by the time the next wave of influenza comes around. And even if a vaccine were to be approved, many unknowns remain.</p>
COVID-19 and Flu Simultaneously<p>For example, there is a lack of practical experience in dealing simultaneously with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza. It is possible to speculate that having influenza could facilitate the entry of the coronavirus into the human body. "The general weakening of the immune system during an influenza infection could increase the susceptibility of a patient to a SARS-CoV-2 infection," Krause says.</p><p>However, it is uncertain how dangerous this double infection could ultimately be and what can be done about it. Krause is of the opinion that we must arm ourselves against all three diseases — colds, flu and COVID-19. If we have a cold, bed rest, hot tea and cough medicine usually help. We can get vaccinated against flu. But how do we deal with COVID-19?</p><p><span></span>Probably people can only hope that if they get the illness, they will have a mild form with as few after-effects as possible. Here, it will certainly help to stick to suggested rules on hygiene to reduce or prevent our exposure to the virus. In an interview with DW, Bonn-based virology professor Hendrik Streeck made it clear that COVID-19 usually takes a more severe course when there is a high viral load at infection.</p>
Hygiene, Hygiene, Hygiene<p>The same hygiene measures with which we are trying to get at least some kind of grip on COVID-19 also apply to influenza. The less we come into contact with viruses, the greater the chance that we will be spared an infection or that it will be mild.</p><p>These measures include general hygiene precautions such as frequent hand washing and the wearing of protective face masks. "The various hygienic measures against COVID-19 will also reduce the spread of influenza," says Krause. "Possibly, further connections of a more immunological nature will be discovered."</p><p>Let us hope that is the case, because the flu season hasn't even started.</p>
- Fauci Warns Bad Second Wave of Coronavirus Could Hit U.S. ... ›
- U.S. Coronavirus Death Toll Tops 170,000 Ahead of Flu Season ... ›
- COVID-19 Makes Getting a Flu Shot More Important Than Ever ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Rising temperatures in the air and the water surrounding Greenland are melting its massive ice sheet at a faster rate than anytime in the last 12 millennia, according to a new study published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
- Greenland and Antarctica Already Melting at 'Worst-Case-Scenario ... ›
- Warmer Current Is Carving Away Greenland Ice Sheet From Below ... ›
- Greenland's Ice Sheet Is Melting at Rate That Surpasses Scientists ... ›
- Greenland's Ice Sheet Has Reached 'Point of No Return' - EcoWatch ›
- Record Shrinking of Greenland's Ice Sheet Raises Sea Levels ... ›
- Greenland Ice Sheet Melt Creates Huge Waterfalls, Increasing ... ›
A grim new assessment of the world's flora and fungi has found that two-fifths of its species are at risk of extinction as humans encroach on the natural world, as The Guardian reported. That puts the number of species at risk near 140,000.
- Climate Crisis Could Cause a Third of Plant and Animal Species to ... ›
- World Leaders Urged to 'Act Now' to Save Biodiversity - EcoWatch ›
- Bumblebees Face Extinction From the Climate Crisis - EcoWatch ›
- Plant Extinction Is Happening 500x Faster Than Before the Industrial ... ›
As human activity transforms the atmosphere, flowers are changing their colors.
- The Best Plants to Attract Pollinators, by Region - EcoWatch ›
- Corals Turn Bright Neon in Last-Ditch Effort to Survive - EcoWatch ›
- Hummingbirds Live in a More Colorful World, Study Confirms ... ›
By Sharon Zhang
Back in March, when the pandemic had just planted its roots in the U.S., President Donald Trump directed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to do something devastating: The agency was to indefinitely and cruelly suspend environmental rule enforcement. The EPA complied, and for just under half a year, it provided over 3,000 waivers that granted facilities clemency from state-level environmental rule compliance.