
By Shilpa Patel and Giulia Christianson
One day after the momentous inauguration of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) earlier this month, World Resources Institute (WRI), Ministry of Strategy and Finance of the Republic of Korea and Korea Capital Market Institute co-hosted the Climate Finance and Private Sector: Investing in New Opportunities conference. More than 250 people—drawn from Korean and international business, finance, government and civil society communities—came to share their experience, discuss opportunities associated with climate-friendly investments, and provide insights to the GCF as it begins its operationalization process.
Climate change mitigation and adaptation investment needs are urgent, significant and growing. The world will need to devote trillions of dollars into clean energy, sustainable transport and other green infrastructure to limit global temperature rise to 2 degrees C and prevent the worsening effects of climate change. Private sector investment will be critical to achieving the type of low-carbon, climate-resilient growth necessary to secure a sustainable future.
The event featured four plenary discussions in addition to keynote speeches. Each session delivered important insights about the role that the GCF can play in mobilizing private investment. Here are the main messages that event participants shared:
1. The Vision: The GCF Can Be a Bridge to a Lower-Carbon, Climate-Resilient World.
Tackling climate change will need a new growth model that focuses on quality of economic growth. Climate and economy need not be trade-offs. Addressing climate change does not have to be a story of costs and burdens, but a story of investment and inclusive growth, jobs and resilience.
There has never been such a strong business case for action. Risks are rising and climate impacts are already being felt around the world. The paradigm of the past is not only under increasing pressure, but is actually already giving way. The new paradigm—the low-carbon, resilient, high-profitability paradigm—is slowly emerging, but has not yet taken hold across the world.
The private sector has a significant role in the new paradigm, but public finance is required to catalyze massive private investment. The GCF can play a key role in establishing this new growth model and, through its Private Sector Facility, encouraging the private sector to invest in sustainable development. By engaging both the public and private sectors, the GCF can help nudge the world onto a lower-carbon, resilient development path.
2. Many Opportunities Exist, but Not All Are Being Realized.
Event attendees heard from “first mover” corporate leaders who have already invested in climate-relevant activities in order to capitalize on a business opportunity. They pointed out that the business agenda is not about climate change; if it is not related to pure economics there will be no investments.Increasingly affordable solar photovoltaics or a number of opportunities in the supply chain—lithium-ion batteries for hybrid and electric vehicles, for example—make business sense and allow “first movers” to develop a valuable competitive edge in the market.
Yet there are still several existing opportunities that businesses have not capitalized on. Energy efficiency, for example, can deliver big climate benefits while reducing costs, yet it is not happening at the scale needed. Energy efficiency is like low-hanging fruit, according to one panelist, but it is almost as if it is hanging below eye-level, so it is often overlooked.
The GCF can help overcome barriers to realizing these opportunities by helping address credit risk perceptions, providing financing and by finding ways to aggregate a number of small transactions to reduce overall transaction costs.
3. Public and Private: In Step and Synchronized
Climate change is a challenge that needs both public and private intervention. The private sector is very good at identifying opportunities, maximizing profit and managing risks. Working with the private sector allows public institutions to multiply the number of partners to work with, thus enabling scale. But the public sector must empower the private sector to invest in climate-relevant activities and products. They can do this by creating enabling environments and enacting conducive policies that encourage investment, such as renewable energy targets or energy efficiency standards. The GCF can also help address structural issues by promoting climate-friendly policies in member countries. Fossil fuel energy subsidies, for example, make it difficult for renewable energy investments to compete, and they discourage energy-efficiency investments. The GCF presents an opportunity to create a real partnership between the public and private sectors to fund low-carbon, resilient development.
This partnership should be based on clear principles on the use of public funds to prevent moral hazard, including avoiding distorting markets and preventing prolonged dependence on the GCF. Given that public resources are scarce, the GCF needs to seek “bang for buck.” A key question is, how can we minimize financial support from the GCF while maximizing investment from the private sector? Innovation has a role to play, but an appropriate balance between the new and the tried-and-true needs to be found so that the GCF can start quickly, scale up rapidly, and deliver results.
4. The GCF Must Carve Out its Own Niche.
The GCF was established at the 2010 climate negotiations in Cancun to be the premier channel for climate finance. The international community wanted a new kind of institution with a new kind of governance to address climate change challenges. But it was never meant to be the only institution in this space. The GCF is the new kid on the block – and it needs to play with others while defining its niche.
To determine the most effective role for itself, the GCF should take a hard look at existing institutions—such as the Global Environment Facility or the Climate Investment Funds—and identify what works and what does not in the context of climate finance. When asked to describe the ideal aspirations of the GCF in a few words, panelists spoke of ambition, leadership, partnerships, impact—in short, a game-changer. Establishing a clear, value-added role is the only way to ensure that the GCF becomes the game-changer it’s intended to be.
5. The GCF Can Act as a GPS for the Climate Investment Community.
There are very large pools of institutional capital, but insignificant amounts are currently going into green investments. Partly this is due to lack of familiarity on the part of fund managers. Partly it is natural inertia: It is easier to make short-term money investing in the familiar rather than investing in a long-term green project such as solar power installations in the developing world. But money must flow to climate-relevant investments if we are to contain global temperature rise.
What will this take? Speakers mentioned:
Project pipeline: There are simply not enough viable, commercially competitive, climate-relevant projects out there to fund, so project development is needed. The GCF’s Readiness Facility can help in pipeline development.
Upside: Investors have to see the benefits to them, so projects must be commercially viable. This can be especially challenging in newer or smaller markets. The GCF’s Private Sector Facility can help provide concessional financial support.
Downside: Investors may be scared off by a project’s potential risks, such as uncertain financial viability, technical performance or mid-course policy changes. The GCF’s Private Sector Facility can help absorb some of these risks by providing tailored mitigation instruments and mechanisms—many of which are already available.
Ecosystem: For any new asset class, an ecosystem of players—fund managers, credit rating agencies, and benchmark indices—is needed. This does not yet exist for green infrastructure. With its presence and some early successes, the GCF can spur the development of such an ecosystem.
Becoming a Major Force in Climate Finance
The GCF has the potential to become a powerful force in unlocking private sector finance—if it takes the necessary steps to become a game-changer. The unique strength of the GCF should be its ability to intervene holistically and help investors navigate the complex climate finance landscape. By mobilizing and more effectively deploying climate finance—from both public and private sectors—the GCF can play a pivotal role in helping the world mitigate and adapt to climate impacts.
Visit EcoWatch’s CLIMATE CHANGE page for more related news on this topic.
New fossils uncovered in Argentina may belong to one of the largest animals to have walked on Earth.
- Groundbreaking Fossil Shows Prehistoric 15-Foot Reptile Tried to ... ›
- Skull of Smallest Known Dinosaur Found in 99-Million-Year Old Amber ›
- Giant 'Toothed' Birds Flew Over Antarctica 40 Million Years Ago ... ›
- World's Second-Largest Egg Found in Antarctica Probably Hatched ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
A federal court on Tuesday struck down the Trump administration's rollback of the Obama-era Clean Power Plan regulating greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.
- Pruitt Guts the Clean Power Plan: How Weak Will the New EPA ... ›
- It's Official: Trump Administration to Repeal Clean Power Plan ... ›
- 'Deadly' Clean Power Plan Replacement ›
Trending
By Jonathan Runstadler and Kaitlin Sawatzki
Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers have found coronavirus infections in pet cats and dogs and in multiple zoo animals, including big cats and gorillas. These infections have even happened when staff were using personal protective equipment.
Gorillas have been affected by human viruses in the past and are susceptible to the coronavirus. Thomas Fuhrmann via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA
- Gorillas in San Diego Test Positive for Coronavirus - EcoWatch ›
- Wildlife Rehabilitators Are Overwhelmed During the Pandemic. In ... ›
- Coronavirus Pandemic Linked to Destruction of Wildlife and World's ... ›
- Utah Mink Becomes First Wild Animal to Test Positive for Coronavirus ›
By Peter Giger
The speed and scale of the response to COVID-19 by governments, businesses and individuals seems to provide hope that we can react to the climate change crisis in a similarly decisive manner - but history tells us that humans do not react to slow-moving and distant threats.
A Game of Jenga
<p>Think of it as a game of Jenga and the planet's climate system as the tower. For generations, we have been slowly removing blocks. But at some point, we will remove a pivotal block, such as the collapse of one of the major global ocean circulation systems, for example the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), that will cause all or part of the global climate system to fall into a planetary emergency.</p><p>But worse still, it could cause runaway damage: Where the tipping points form a domino-like cascade, where breaching one triggers breaches of others, creating an unstoppable shift to a radically and swiftly changing climate.</p><p>One of the most concerning tipping points is mass methane release. Methane can be found in deep freeze storage within permafrost and at the bottom of the deepest oceans in the form of methane hydrates. But rising sea and air temperatures are beginning to thaw these stores of methane.</p><p>This would release a powerful greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, 30-times more potent than carbon dioxide as a global warming agent. This would drastically increase temperatures and rush us towards the breach of other tipping points.</p><p>This could include the acceleration of ice thaw on all three of the globe's large, land-based ice sheets – Greenland, West Antarctica and the Wilkes Basin in East Antarctica. The potential collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet is seen as a key tipping point, as its loss could eventually <a href="https://science.sciencemag.org/content/324/5929/901" target="_blank">raise global sea levels by 3.3 meters</a> with important regional variations.</p><p>More than that, we would be on the irreversible path to full land-ice melt, causing sea levels to rise by up to 30 meters, roughly at the rate of two meters per century, or maybe faster. Just look at the raised beaches around the world, at the last high stand of global sea level, at the end of the Pleistocene period around 120,0000 years ago, to see the evidence of such a warm world, which was just 2°C warmer than the present day.</p>Cutting Off Circulation
<p>As well as devastating low-lying and coastal areas around the world, melting polar ice could set off another tipping point: a disablement to the AMOC.</p><p>This circulation system drives a northward flow of warm, salty water on the upper layers of the ocean from the tropics to the northeast Atlantic region, and a southward flow of cold water deep in the ocean.</p><p>The ocean conveyor belt has a major effect on the climate, seasonal cycles and temperature in western and northern Europe. It means the region is warmer than other areas of similar latitude.</p><p>But melting ice from the Greenland ice sheet could threaten the AMOC system. It would dilute the salty sea water in the north Atlantic, making the water lighter and less able or unable to sink. This would slow the engine that drives this ocean circulation.</p><p><a href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/atlantic-conveyor-belt-has-slowed-15-per-cent-since-mid-twentieth-century" target="_blank">Recent research</a> suggests the AMOC has already weakened by around 15% since the middle of the 20th century. If this continues, it could have a major impact on the climate of the northern hemisphere, but particularly Europe. It may even lead to the <a href="https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/39731?show=full" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">cessation of arable farming</a> in the UK, for instance.</p><p>It may also reduce rainfall over the Amazon basin, impact the monsoon systems in Asia and, by bringing warm waters into the Southern Ocean, further destabilize ice in Antarctica and accelerate global sea level rise.</p>The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation has a major effect on the climate. Praetorius (2018)
Is it Time to Declare a Climate Emergency?
<p>At what stage, and at what rise in global temperatures, will these tipping points be reached? No one is entirely sure. It may take centuries, millennia or it could be imminent.</p><p>But as COVID-19 taught us, we need to prepare for the expected. We were aware of the risk of a pandemic. We also knew that we were not sufficiently prepared. But we didn't act in a meaningful manner. Thankfully, we have been able to fast-track the production of vaccines to combat COVID-19. But there is no vaccine for climate change once we have passed these tipping points.</p><p><a href="https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2021" target="_blank">We need to act now on our climate</a>. Act like these tipping points are imminent. And stop thinking of climate change as a slow-moving, long-term threat that enables us to kick the problem down the road and let future generations deal with it. We must take immediate action to reduce global warming and fulfill our commitments to the <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Paris Agreement</a>, and build resilience with these tipping points in mind.</p><p>We need to plan now to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, but we also need to plan for the impacts, such as the ability to feed everyone on the planet, develop plans to manage flood risk, as well as manage the social and geopolitical impacts of human migrations that will be a consequence of fight or flight decisions.</p><p>Breaching these tipping points would be cataclysmic and potentially far more devastating than COVID-19. Some may not enjoy hearing these messages, or consider them to be in the realm of science fiction. But if it injects a sense of urgency to make us respond to climate change like we have done to the pandemic, then we must talk more about what has happened before and will happen again.</p><p>Otherwise we will continue playing Jenga with our planet. And ultimately, there will only be one loser – us.</p>By John R. Platt
The period of the 45th presidency will go down as dark days for the United States — not just for the violent insurgency and impeachment that capped off Donald Trump's four years in office, but for every regressive action that came before.
- Biden Announces $2 Trillion Climate and Green Recovery Plan ... ›
- How Biden and Kerry Can Rebuild America's Climate Leadership ... ›
- Biden's EPA Pick Michael Regan Urged to Address Environmental ... ›
- How Joe Biden's Climate Plan Compares to the Green New Deal ... ›