EcoWatch
Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k Subscribe Subscribe
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Conservation
  • Food + Agriculture
  • Renewables
  • Oceans
  • Policy
  • Insights + Opinion
  • Go Solar Today
      • Top Companies By State
        • California Solar Companies
        • Texas Solar Companies
        • New York Solar Companies
        • Florida Solar Companies
        • See All States
      • Top Incentives By State
        • California Solar Incentives
        • Texas Solar Incentives
        • New York Solar Incentives
        • Florida Solar Incentives
        • See All States
      • Solar Panel Costs By State
        • Solar Panel Costs in California
        • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
        • Solar Panel Costs in New York
        • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
        • See All States
      • Value of Solar by State
        • Is Solar Worth It In California?
        • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
        • Is Solar Worth It New York?
        • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
        • See All States
      • Company Reviews
        • Tesla Solar Review
        • Sunrun Solar Review
        • SunPower Solar Review
        • Vivint Solar Review
        • See All Companies
      • Common Solar Questions
        • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
        • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
        • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
        • Can You Finance Solar?
        • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
        • Payback On Solar Panels?
      • Solar Resources
        • Interactive Solar Calculator
        • Federal Solar Tax Credit
        • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
        • Tesla Solar Roof Review
        • Cheapest Solar Panels
      • Companies Compared
        • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs SunPower
        • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
        • SunPower vs ADT Solar
EcoWatch
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Conservation
  • Food + Agriculture
  • Renewables
  • Oceans
  • Policy
  • Insights + Opinion
  • Go Solar Today
    • Go Solar Today
    • Top Companies By State
      • California Solar Companies
      • Texas Solar Companies
      • New York Solar Companies
      • Florida Solar Companies
      • See All States
    • Top Incentives By State
      • California Solar Incentives
      • Texas Solar Incentives
      • New York Solar Incentives
      • Florida Solar Incentives
      • See All States
    • Solar Panel Costs By State
      • Solar Panel Costs in California
      • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
      • Solar Panel Costs in New York
      • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
      • See All States
    • Value of Solar by State
      • Is Solar Worth It In California?
      • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
      • Is Solar Worth It New York?
      • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
      • See All States
    • Company Reviews
      • Tesla Solar Review
      • Sunrun Solar Review
      • SunPower Solar Review
      • Vivint Solar Review
      • See All Companies
    • Common Solar Questions
      • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
      • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
      • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
      • Can You Finance Solar?
      • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
      • Payback On Solar Panels?
    • Solar Resources
      • Interactive Solar Calculator
      • Federal Solar Tax Credit
      • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
      • Tesla Solar Roof Review
      • Cheapest Solar Panels
    • Companies Compared
      • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs SunPower
      • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
      • SunPower vs ADT Solar

The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k
    EcoWatch
    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k
    Home Pollution

    3M Knew PFAS ‘Forever Chemicals’ in Its Firefighting Foams Were Toxic for Decades, Documents Reveal

    By: Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
    Published: January 16, 2025
    Edited by Chris McDermott
    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon
    Firemen work to extinguish a fire with foam
    Firemen work to extinguish a fire with foam. sunara / E+ / Getty Images
    Why you can trust us

    Founded in 2005 as an Ohio-based environmental newspaper, EcoWatch is a digital platform dedicated to publishing quality, science-based content on environmental issues, causes, and solutions.

    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

    For decades, 3M — a multibillion-dollar chemical company based in Minnesota — sold its firefighting foams as safe and biodegradable, while having knowledge that they contained toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), according to newly uncovered documents, reported The Guardian.

    Starting in the 1960s and continuing until 2003, 3M’s firefighting foams contained perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), two types of PFAS “forever chemicals.”

    The synthetic chemical compounds have been linked to a variety of health problems like thyroid disease, hormonal and fertility problems, high cholesterol and cancer. They are called “forever chemicals” because it can take thousands of years for them to break down in the environment.

    The Guardian and Watershed Investigations discovered that evidence of the inability of PFOS to naturally biodegrade began to surface as early as 1949. However, 3M continued to publish brochures and information for customers that said the firefighting foams would break down in the environment until the 1990s.

    3M firefighting foam brochures from 1979 described the foams as “environmental neutral” and “biodegradable, low in toxicity, and… can be treated in biological treatment systems,” The Guardian reported.

    In 1993, 3M data sheets were still claiming that the foams were “treatable in a biological wastewater treatment system,” though they admitted some elements might persist in treated wastewater.

    PFAS expert professor Ian Cousins with Stockholm University described the disposal of foams in sewer systems as “disastrous,” since the chemicals would have gone “straight through the wastewater treatment process, either ending up in the effluent from the wastewater treatment plant or in the sludge,” as reported by The Guardian.

    From there the effluent was released into rivers, while the sludge was frequently applied to crops.

    In 1949, a piece in Scientific American stated that fluorocarbons — which include PFAS — “do not burn, corrode, mold or decay. Neither rodents nor insects nor fungi can find any nourishment in them.”

    By 1964, it had been determined by HG Bryce, an employee of 3M, that fluorocarbons were “physiologically inert,” meaning they did not biodegrade.

    Lab tests conducted in 1983 showed that PFAS did not degrade, specifying that biodegradation could not be expected “in an aquatic environment.”

    In 2018, 3M paid $890 million in settlements following a lawsuit by Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson against the company for PFAS pollution.

    Five years later, 3M paid over $10 billion in settlements for suits concerning contamination of numerous public drinking water systems without admitting liability.

    In addition to the evidence of 3M having early knowledge that toxic PFAS did not degrade, company meeting minutes from 1978 reviewing studies inflicted upon rats and monkeys said PFOA and PFOS “should be regarded as toxic although the degree of toxicity was left undefined.”

    The misleading information 3M provided to customers for decades has resulted in an unknown quantity of firefighting foams having been misused globally, contaminating water, soils and human bloodstreams with PFAS.

    “When you have a contaminated site, you can clean it up,” Elsie Sunderland, a Harvard University environmental chemist, told ProPublica. “When you ubiquitously introduce a toxicant at a global scale, so that it’s detectable in everyone… we’re reducing public health on an incredibly large scale.”

    3M announced in 2000 that certain PFAS compounds, including PFOA and PFOS, would be phased out in products like Light Water Brand aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF). The company said it has “long since phased both materials out of its operations and also permanently discontinued production of AFFF,” The Guardian reported.

    Two years later, 3M said it would stop the manufacture of all PFAS worldwide “by the end of 2025 and are on schedule to do so… We have engaged in site remediation at our facilities and have invested in state-of-the-art water treatment technologies at sites where we have historically manufactured PFAS.”

    The PFOS-laden foams were finally banned in the UK in 2011, but foams that contain PFOA will not be totally phased out until July of this year. Foams made with other PFAS compounds are still being used by the company.

    PFAS pollution is now found in water, soils, animals and humans all over the world.

    “PFAS chemicals have been used extensively for over 70 years and their persistence once in the environment unfortunately means there are no quick fixes. We have already begun investigating whether to restrict PFAS in firefighting foams and will set out more detail in due course,” said a UK government spokesperson, as reported by The Guardian.

    Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

      By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, and to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

      Cristen Hemingway Jaynes

      Cristen is a writer of fiction and nonfiction. She holds a JD and an Ocean & Coastal Law Certificate from University of Oregon School of Law and an MA in Creative Writing from Birkbeck, University of London. She is the author of the short story collection The Smallest of Entryways, as well as the travel biography, Ernest’s Way: An International Journey Through Hemingway’s Life.
      Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

      Read More

      Methane 101: Understanding the Second Most Important Greenhouse Gas
      By Olivia Rosane and Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
      By EcoWatch
      Mass Die-Off of Western Monarch Butterflies Linked to Pesticides, Study Finds
      A new peer-reviewed study has linked pesticides as a likely
      By Paige Bennett
      Deepest-Known Animal Communities Found Almost Six Miles Below Sea Level
      Thousands of mollusks and worms have been discovered by a
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes

      Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

        By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, and to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

        Latest Articles

        • Methane 101: Understanding the Second Most Important Greenhouse Gas
          by EcoWatch
          August 5, 2025
        • New York Finalizes Rule for New Buildings to Be Electric
          by Paige Bennett
          August 4, 2025
        • Mass Die-Off of Western Monarch Butterflies Linked to Pesticides, Study Finds
          by Paige Bennett
          August 1, 2025
        • Deepest-Known Animal Communities Found Almost Six Miles Below Sea Level
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          August 1, 2025
        • Pristine Forest and Endangered Gorilla Habitat at Risk as Half of DRC Opened to Bids for Oil and Gas Drilling: Report
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          July 31, 2025
        • Global Hunger Fell Overall in 2024, but Rose in Africa and Western Asia as Climate and Conflict Threaten Progress: UN Report
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          July 30, 2025
        • Probiotic Found to Slow Disease Spread Among Florida Coral
          by Paige Bennett
          July 29, 2025
        • Earth Overshoot Day Reaches Record for Earliest Date
          by Paige Bennett
          July 28, 2025
        EcoWatch

        The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

          • Climate Climate
          • Animals Animals
          • Health + Wellness Health + Wellness
          • Insights + Opinion Insights + Opinion
          • Adventure Adventure
          • Oceans Oceans
          • Business Business
          • Solar Solar
          • About EcoWatch
          • Contact EcoWatch
          • EcoWatch Reviews
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy Policy
          • Learn About Solar Energy
          • Learn About Deregulated Energy
          • EcoWatch UK
          Follow Us
          Facebook 558k
          Twitter 222k
          Instagram 52k
          Subscribe Subscribe

          Experts for a healthier planet and life.

          Mentioned by:
          Learn more
          • Privacy Policy
          • Terms of Use
          • Cookie Preferences
          • Do Not Sell My Information
          © 2026 EcoWatch. All Rights Reserved.

          Advertiser Disclosure

          Our editorial team is committed to creating independent and objective content focused on helping our readers make informed decisions. To help support these efforts we receive compensation from companies that advertise with us.

          The compensation we receive from these companies may impact how and where products appear on this site. This compensation does not influence the recommendations or advice our editorial team provides within our content. We do not include all companies, products or offers that may be available.