Twenty four states and a coal company filed lawsuits yesterday over President Obama's Clean Power Plan, which was formally published Friday. "The Clean Power Plan, which requires states to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants 32 percent by 2030, is intended to help slow climate change resulting from the burning of fossil fuels," explains InsideClimate News. "The plan has been the target of legal challenges and legislative campaigns since it was proposed in 2014 and finalized in August."
What is the #CleanPowerPlan & why is it such an important step on climate change? Find out: https://t.co/Q8dlUvvDQz https://t.co/Gv5lYFsZXi— Facts On Climate (@Facts On Climate)1445614211.0
The two dozen states and Murray Energy have accused the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of "going far beyond the authority Congress granted to it," according to The Hill. They are calling on the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to overturn the rule, and they are asking the court to "immediately stop its implementation" while the lawsuit plays out."
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, who is leading the charge, called it “the single most onerous and illegal regulations that we’ve seen coming out of DC in a long time." He added, "the EPA cannot do what it intends to do legally.”
Morrisey is joined by attorneys general from Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Arizona and North Carolina.
Utility Dive: Final Clean Power Plan rule published; 24 states sue EPA; Indiana… https://t.co/6W7nGd7nqU https://t.co/7yttWza32D— Laura Ann Arnold (@Laura Ann Arnold)1445615615.0
The EPA maintains that its rule is legal. “The Clean Power Plan has strong scientific and legal foundations, provides states with broad flexibilities to design and implement plans, and is clearly within EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act,” U.S. EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said in a statement.
Fifteen other states, including Washington, DC, say they plan to intervene on behalf of the EPA, arguing that the rules are not only legal, they are necessary. “Significant reductions in these emissions must occur to prevent increases in the frequency, magnitude and scale of the adverse impacts of climate change,” wrote New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman in a letter to the EPA in August.
Though the rule's opponents cry foul, "officials in practically every state have been doing some amount of work [to comply with the standards]," Kyle Danish, a partner at Van Ness Feldman law firm, told InsideClimate News. Danish is helping the industry comply with the regulations and says, "many states have been taking a number of steps to start putting together compliance plans."
Think Progress writes:
The arguments will likely come down to debates over whether the EPA has overstepped its jurisdiction by allowing flexible state plans to include “outside the fence” measures such as efficiency and renewable energy, and whether another section of the Clean Air Act, which governs mercury emissions from power plants, renders the EPA unable to also regulate carbon.
Michael Myers, assistant attorney general of New York, disputed both those claims. The mercury or carbon argument “doesn’t make any sense,” Myers told ThinkProgress. “The contention that Congress intended the EPA to pick one of those, not both of them, is not an argument that is going to prevail in court.”
Environmental groups, including Earthjustice, Natural Resource Defense Council, Sierra Club and Environmental Defense Fund have also vowed to intervene on behalf of the EPA.
“Its opponents are on the wrong side of the law and the wrong side of history,” Howard Fox, an attorney with Earthjustice, told Think Progress.
We need people like you to stand up for the #CleanPowerPlan. Download our free activist kit: https://t.co/j8NL70zpRb https://t.co/mtwNI7xMa4— Climate Reality (@Climate Reality)1445532650.0
Mary Anne Hitt, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign, said in a statement:
Time and again, we’ve seen Big Polluters and their allies attack the lifesaving protections that let our loved ones breathe easier and keep our clean energy economy thriving, and this challenge to the Clean Power Plan is no different. The Clean Power Plan will help us move toward a new era of clean, affordable energy that protects the health of our communities, grows our economy and signals to the rest of the world that the U.S. is serious about combating the climate crisis ahead of international negotiations in Paris later this year. It’s a huge step in taking action against climate disruption by pulling together state-level carbon pollution reduction plans and holding polluters accountable for doing their fair share.
They can throw everything and the kitchen sink at this standard, but the Clean Power Plan’s push to cut dangerous carbon pollution from power plants for the first time ever is based on a law passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court, and it has the overwhelming support of the American people.
Many have noted that it's no surprise that most of the opponents come from coal-heavy states and that all but three of those states (Kentucky, Missouri and North Carolina) have Republican attorneys general.
Rhea Suh at the Natural Resources Defense Council says, "Big Coal and its political allies" are "not going to get away with it — the stakes are too high for that."
She writes:
We just finished the hottest summer since global record-keeping began in 1880, with world land and sea temperatures 1.53 degrees Fahrenheit above the 20th-century average. Last year was the hottest year ever recorded. And 19 of the hottest years on record have all occurred in the past two decades.
Small wonder that seven in 10 Americans understand the planet is warming. No surprise, either, that the pool of doubters who dismiss the definitive science on the issue has reached a shallow 16 percent of the population— the lowest in modern time. Those are the findings of a poll taken in September by the University of Michigan and Muhlenberg College, another sign the tide is turning toward real action on climate change.
Joanne Spalding, chief climate counsel for Sierra Club, told Think Progress: “We are confident that the Clean Power Plan is on legally sound footing. EPA does have the authority. The law says so and the Supreme Court has said so, twice. The matter, I believe, should be put to rest."
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Mexico Braces for Hurricane Patricia: ‘Strongest Storm Ever Measured’
Why Bill Gates’ Position on Divesting From Fossil Fuels Is Wrong
Donald Trump Blames Intern for Tweet Insulting Monsanto, Ben Carson and Iowa Republicans
By Anna Huber
- The importance of water – and its vital role in tackling global challenges – is not fully understood or communicated within water-rich nations.
- On a personal, political and global level, there are many actions we can take to change the way we use and manage water.
- World Water Day 2021 focuses on the value of water and how it impacts our everyday life, social and economic stability, climate change and the achievement of SDGs.
Today's World Water Day revolves around the social, economic and environmental value of water, and the essential role it plays in everyone's life. From determining where the world's oldest cities were built and where conflicts break out, to ensuring that we can access internet services and stop the spread of COVID-19 today, the significance of the role that water plays in the world cannot be understated. Water means equality: local water resources and separate toilets can determine whether a girl accesses education, while globally, it impacts the distribution of wealth.
1. Steps Individuals Can Take to Prioritize Water
<p>Valuing water as an individual means we must stop polluting and start reducing daily water use (SDG 3, 13, 14).</p><p>Did you know that millions of people still dispose of their medicines in toilets, and that discarded plastics pollute our rivers and oceans, with microplastics found in <a target="_blank"></a><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"></a><a href="https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32245" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">81% of our urban drinking water</a>. Or that contrary to popular belief, water pollution does not decrease with economic growth, but expands? Tackling water quality can be simple: <a href="https://thinkbeforeyouflush.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">think before you flush</a> or throw anything into waterways.</p>2. Measures Governments Can Take
<p><span>Valuing water on the policy level implies featuring water as a key element in cross-sectoral policy documents and enforcements (SDG 10, 11, 16).</span></p><p>Only a few countries, such as South Africa and Slovenia, have water access written into their constitution as a human right. Many have signed a water charter, such as the US or the European Union, that recognizes the importance of water, but do not enforce their guidelines.</p><p>Governments can raise awareness of their citizens' water footprint and offer tax incentives to be less wasteful e.g. <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-10/make-money-by-showering-less" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">financially rewarding water conservation</a> rather than charging for its consumption, while also engaging businesses to establish water-positive behavior. This might include<a href="https://waterfootprint.org/en/water-footprint/national-water-footprint/what-can-governments-do/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"> setting limits for water consumptions and pollution</a>, but also collecting data on the national water footprint. A clearer water statistic can help inform water resource management, governance and policies.</p><p>Globally, governments can demand that water be featured as the enabler to achieve the SDGs and Paris Agreement.</p>3. What Companies Can Do to Improve Their Water Management
<p>Valuing water in the private sector relates to practices, pollution and partnerships (SDG 7, 8, 9, 12 and 17).</p><p>Many companies have improved their water usage in innovative ways. Companies such as Colgate- Palmolive have set their own <a href="https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/water/water-security-how-can-pricing-drive-change" target="_blank">internal water pricing</a>, paying more than the current below-cost price for industrial water supply. Not only does that prepare companies for the inevitable cost increase, but it also signals that water should be valued more. Others have committed to give back more water than they consume, such as <a href="https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2020/09/21/microsoft-will-replenish-more-water-than-it-consumes-by-2030/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Microsoft</a>, or are working on a transformational investment framework for water, such as <a href="https://www.dws.com/insights/global-research-institute/a-transformational-framework-for-water-risk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">DWS</a>.</p>Private sector action to reduce water pollution is still dangerously lacking. Water pollution: CDP, 2020
<p>There has been much less progress in relation to water quality, however, with only 4.4% businesses showing improvement in their water pollution reduction targets. If current available technologies were fully utilized, companies could aim to release water in an even cleaner state to the environment than how it was extracted.</p><p>Finally, valuing water means to <a href="https://blogs.worldbank.org/water/eight-reasons-why-partnerships-are-vital-water" target="_blank">foster partnerships</a>, such as <a href="https://50lhome.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">50L Home</a> or the <a href="https://www.weforum.org/platforms/covid-action-platform/projects/mobilizing-hand-hygiene-for-all-initiative" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mobilizing Hand Hygiene for All Initiative</a>. This includes engaging local communities that sit at the source of water, following policy guidelines and collaborating with other private-sector companies.</p><p><span></span>In a nutshell, if individuals, governments and companies want to tackle our biggest global challenges, we should start by taking concrete actions to value water.</p><p><span></span><em>Reposted with permission from the <a href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/03/water-how-to-stop-undervaluing-a-precious-resource-and-be-ready-for-the-future/" target="_blank">World Economic Forum</a>. </em></p>- California Faces 'Critically Dry Year' - EcoWatch ›
- Severe Drought Could Impact Yellowstone's Old Faithful Geyser ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Installing solar panels over California's network of water canals could save the state an estimated 63 billion gallons of water and produce 13 gigawatts of renewable power every year, according to a feasibility study published in Nature Sustainability.
Trending
By Stuart Braun
The melting of the polar ice caps has often been portrayed as a tsunami-inducing Armageddon in popular culture. In the 2004 disaster movie The Day After Tomorrow, the warming Gulf Stream and North Atlantic currents cause rapid polar melting. The result is a massive wall of ocean water that swamps New York City and beyond, killing millions in the process. And like the recent polar vortex in the Northern Hemisphere, freezing air then rushes in from the poles to spark another ice age.
The sea ice cover in Canada's Gulf of St. Lawrence is the lowest it has ever been since measurements began, and that is seriously bad news for the harp seals that are typically born on the ice.
- Sea Ice Still Hasn't Formed off of Siberia and Scientists Are Worried ... ›
- Arctic Warming Endangers Ringed Seals - EcoWatch ›
By Brian Lovett
As winter phases into spring across the U.S., gardeners are laying in supplies and making plans. Meanwhile, as the weather warms, common garden insects such as bees, beetles and butterflies will emerge from underground burrows or nests within or on plants.
Giant swallowtail (left) and Palamedes swallowtail (right) drinking water from a puddle. K. Draper / Flickr / CC BY-ND

