Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) has been surging in the polls lately, leading more and more political strategists to predict (R-FL) for the Republican nomination. He was tied for first place with Trump in a poll of Republicans in Iowa last week. Cruz—well known for his over-the-top rhetoric—has made some outrageous statements on climate change in recent months.
1. On Wednesday, Cruz mocked President Obama's assertion that the COP21 climate summit in Paris was a "powerful rebuke" to terrorists and said the President and Hillary Clinton's stance on climate change as a security threat is "nutty, fruitcake stuff."
“What nonsense. I mean, President Obama and Hillary Clinton believe that the SUV in your driveway is a greater threat to our safety and security than are radical Islamic terrorists who are crucifying Christians and beheading children and pledging to wage jihad on the United States of America,” he said, repeating an attack line he has used before.
2. Cruz is using his position as Senate chairman of the Commerce Subcommittee on Space, Science and Competitiveness to hold a hearing on whether climate science is "data or dogma."
The hearing, Data or Dogma? Promoting Open Inquiry in the Debate over the Magnitude of Human Impact on Earth’s Climate, is scheduled for Tuesday. Cruz rejects the scientific consensus on global warming, arguing "there is still a healthy and vigorous debate about the causes and nature of climate change based on the data and scientific evidence." He also contends that observed satellite data shows no significant warming trend in the last 18 years, despite findings from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration which specifically prove that there has been no "pause" in global warming.
Scientific conclusions should be based on the evidence & data, not the wishes of liberal global warming alarmists - https://t.co/8T9STFIF8K— Senator Ted Cruz (@Senator Ted Cruz)1449088425.0
3. The so-called "data or dogma" hearing certainly won't be the first time the Texas senator has used a Senate hearing to debate climate science.
During a Senate hearing, Opportunity Denied: How Overregulation Harms Minorities, Cruz (chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts, as well) stonewalled the entire discussion. Sierra Club President Aaron Mair, who testified, said he was there to talk about "how communities of color, which are disproportionately affected by pollution and climate disruption, rely on these safeguards to protect them." Instead, Cruz used the opportunity to badger Mair about the existence of global warming.
Watch the hearing here:
And check out Sierra Club President Aaron Mair's response here:
Mears, a physicist and senior scientist at Remote Sensing Systems, wrote:
Mr. Cruz … likes to cite statistics about the last 17 years because 17 years ago, the … observed temperatures were substantially above normal … When one starts their analysis on an extraordinarily warm year, the resulting trend is below the true long term trend. It’s like a pro baseball player deciding he’s having a batting slump three weeks after a game when he hit three homers because he’s only considering those three weeks instead of the whole season.
5. Cruz called President Obama's Clean Power Plan a "radical attempt to destabilize the nation’s energy system," "illegal" and "the sort of power grab that our founders would have recognized as tyranny.” The remarks were delivered last month at the Texas Public Policy Foundation's second annual at the Crossroads: Energy & Climate Policy Summit.
6. He joined fellow right wing politicians in comparing climate change to religion, which has “become a go-to GOP talking point during the run-up to next year’s elections,” according to a post from the University of Southern California’s Religion Dispatches. In October, Cruz told Glenn Beck: for “global warming alarmists ... climate change is not science, it's religion."
7. The Associated Press asked eight climate and biological scientists to grade (on a 0-100 scale) the comments of top presidential candidates for their scientific accuracy. Cruz ranked dead last with six percent.
The names of the candidates were removed to eliminate bias, so the scientists were scrutinizing them merely on scientific grounds. One of the scientists, Penn State University professor Michael Mann, said of Cruz's record: “This individual understands less about science [and climate change] than the average kindergartner. That sort of ignorance would be dangerous in a doorman, let alone a president.”
On climate science, Democratic candidates excel, while Republicans trail further behind: https://t.co/7nYoGz4OQq https://t.co/oOdzlSZ5YB— AP Interactive (@AP Interactive)1448373770.0
8. Conversely, Koch Brothers-backed group American Energy Alliance gave Cruz its highest ranking, labeling him a “hero” (he was the only candidate to receive the dubious distinction). The group produced a scorecard ranking the 2016 presidential candidates "based on their opposition to policies meant to tackle climate change, such as the Environmental Protection Agency regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, a renewable fuels standard and a tax credit that benefits wind energy," according to The Guardian. As for Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley? They're "villains," according to American Energy Alliance.
9. Salon's Simon Maloy called the GOP's (particularly Cruz and Rubio) rejection of climate science a radical departure from what is now seen as the more moderate stances of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, thanks to classified memos from each of their administrations obtained on Thursday by The Washington Post.
The evidence of a crisis is literally everywhere, so not seeing it requires a huge degree of willful blindness. This obstinate, ideology-driven refusal to even recognize that anthropogenic climate change is happening is one of the more powerful indicators of just how radicalized the Republican Party has become over the last 25 years. The GOP’s denialism on climate change is a rebuke of scientific evidence, global consensus and the Republican Party as it existed before the crazy people took over.
10. In an op-ed for The New York Times, Frank Bruni said, "anyone but Ted Cruz" would be a better candidate for the presidency. He compared picking a presidential candidate to hiring someone to work for you. He asked, would you hire someone even though everyone who has worked with him "loathes him." Citing several examples, he argued that's the case with Cruz. "He’s the antithesis of a team player. His thirst for the spotlight is unquenchable. His arrogance is unalloyed," said Bruni. "He actually takes pride in being abrasive, as if a person’s tally of detractors measures his fearlessness, not his obnoxiousness."
Several of his own party members despise him. George W. Bush, who Cruz worked for on his 2000 campaign, recently told Republican donors, "I just don't like the guy." Those sentiments could be chalked up to politicking, but even his former classmates at both Princeton and Harvard don't like him, saying he was "arrogant," "strident" and "creepy." One went so far as to say that the thought of him becoming President was "horrifying." His freshman roommate, Craig Mazin, couldn't stand him. “I would rather have anybody else be the president of the United States. Anyone. I would rather pick somebody from the phone book,” Mazin told The Daily Beast.
"I did not like him at all in college ... And you know, I want to be clear, because Ted Cruz is a nightmare of a human being," Mazin said in an interview. "I have plenty of problems with his politics, but truthfully his personality is so awful that 99 percent of why I hate him is just his personality. If he agreed with me on every issue, I would hate him only one percent less."
11. On Thursday night, Trevor Noah, host of The Daily Show, lambasted "the Republican party's new it-girl" (aka Ted Cruz) for being a "radical conservative, budget-slashing, anti-immigrant, climate denier." He called Cruz an "asshole" for his response to the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California earlier this week and showed a clip from an MSNBC commentator saying, "he's probably one of the most hated people in the Senate. Both Democrats and Republicans do not like this guy."
Watch the clip here:
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
A tornado tore through a city north of Birmingham, Alabama, Monday night, killing one person and injuring at least 30.
- Tornadoes and Climate Change: What Does the Science Say ... ›
- Tornadoes Hit Unusually Wide Swaths of U.S., Alarming Climate ... ›
- 23 Dead as Tornado Pummels Lee County, AL in Further Sign ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By David Konisky
On his first day in office President Joe Biden started signing executive orders to reverse Trump administration policies. One sweeping directive calls for stronger action to protect public health and the environment and hold polluters accountable, including those who "disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities."
Michael S. Regan, President Biden's nominee to lead the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, grew up near a coal-burning power plant in North Carolina and has pledged to "enact an environmental justice framework that empowers people in all communities." NCDEQ
- Report Urges Biden to Reverse Trump's Environmental Rollbacks ›
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ›
- Biden's EPA Pick Michael Regan Urged to Address Environmental ... ›
- Biden Faces Pressure to Tackle 'Unfunded' Toxic Waste Sites ... ›
By Katherine Kornei
Clear-cutting a forest is relatively easy—just pick a tree and start chopping. But there are benefits to more sophisticated forest management. One technique—which involves repeatedly harvesting smaller trees every 30 or so years but leaving an upper story of larger trees for longer periods (60, 90, or 120 years)—ensures a steady supply of both firewood and construction timber.
A Pattern in the Rings<p>The <a href="https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/coppice-standards-0" target="_blank">coppice-with-standards</a> management practice produces a two-story forest, said <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bernhard_Muigg" target="_blank">Bernhard Muigg</a>, a dendrochronologist at the University of Freiburg in Germany. "You have an upper story of single trees that are allowed to grow for several understory generations."</p><p>That arrangement imprints a characteristic tree ring pattern in a forest's upper story trees (the "standards"): thick rings indicative of heavy growth, which show up at regular intervals as the surrounding smaller trees are cut down. "The trees are growing faster," said Muigg. "You can really see it with your naked eye."</p><p>Muigg and his collaborators characterized that <a href="https://ltrr.arizona.edu/about/treerings" target="_blank">dendrochronological pattern</a> in 161 oak trees growing in central Germany, one of the few remaining sites in Europe with actively managed coppice-with-standards forests. They found up to nine cycles of heavy growth in the trees, the oldest of which was planted in 1761. The researchers then turned to a historical data set — more than 2,000 oak <a href="https://eos.org/articles/podcast-discovering-europes-history-through-its-timbers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">timbers from buildings and archaeological sites</a> in Germany and France dating from between 300 and 2015 — to look for a similar pattern.</p>
A Gap of 500 Years<p>The team found wood with the characteristic coppice-with-standards tree ring pattern dating to as early as the 6th century. That was a surprise, Muigg and his colleagues concluded, because the first mention of this forest management practice in historical documents occurred only roughly 500 years later, in the 13th century.</p><p>It's probable that forest management practices were not well documented prior to the High Middle Ages (1000–1250), the researchers suggested. "Forests are mainly mentioned in the context of royal hunting interests or donations," said Muigg. Dendrochronological studies are particularly important because they can reveal information not captured by a sparse historical record, he added.</p><p>These results were <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-78933-8" target="_blank">published in December in <em>Scientific Reports</em></a>.</p><p>"It's nice to see the longevity and the history of coppice-with-standards," said <a href="https://www.teagasc.ie/contact/staff-directory/s/ian-short/" target="_blank">Ian Short</a>, a forestry researcher at Teagasc, the Agriculture and Food Development Authority in Ireland, not involved in the research. This technique is valuable because it promotes conservation and habitat biodiversity, Short said. "In the next 10 or 20 years, I think we'll see more coppice-with-standards coming back into production."</p><p>In the future, Muigg and his collaborators hope to analyze a larger sample of historic timbers to trace how the coppice-with-standards practice spread throughout Europe. It will be interesting to understand where this technique originated and how it propagated, said Muigg, and there are plenty of old pieces of wood waiting to be analyzed. "There [are] tons of dendrochronological data."</p><p><em><a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Katherine Kornei</a> is a freelance science journalist covering Earth and space science. Her bylines frequently appear in Eos, Science, and The New York Times. Katherine holds a Ph.D. in astronomy from the University of California, Los Angeles.</em></p><p><em>This story originally appeared in <a href="https://eos.org/articles/tree-rings-reveal-how-ancient-forests-were-managed" target="_blank">Eos</a></em> <em>and is republished here as part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story.</em></p>
Earth's ice is melting 57 percent faster than in the 1990s and the world has lost more than 28 trillion tons of ice since 1994, research published Monday in The Cryosphere shows.
By Jewel Fraser
Noreen Nunez lives in a middle-class neighborhood that rises up a hillside in Trinidad's Tunapuna-Piarco region.