A month after issuing a stay on the Clean Power Plan, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to another one of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) power plant rules this week.
The Mercury and Air Toxic Standards rule, which tightens restrictions on harmful pollutants that are byproducts of burning coal, was challenged by 20 states, which argue that the regulations are too expensive. Photo credit: Shutterstock
Many see this as a major victory for the Obama administration and an indication that the Clean Power Plan decision was “highly extraordinary.” Obama administration officials praised the court’s decision and EPA spokeswoman Melissa Harrison said the agency was “very pleased.”
The Mercury and Air Toxic Standards rule, which tightens restrictions on harmful pollutants that are byproducts of burning coal, was challenged by 20 states, which argue that the regulations are too expensive. The EPA will issue an economic analysis of the rule in April, but power plants must begin compliance measures now, thanks to the ruling.
For a deeper dive: New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Atlantic, The Hill, Think Progress, GreenWire
For more climate change and clean energy news, you can follow Climate Nexus on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for daily Hot News.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Aubrey McClendon’s Legacy Serves as Another Warning That the Age of Oil Barons Must End
Bankruptcy Filing Shows Arch Coal Funded Climate Denial Group
Oregon Passes Historic Bill to Phase Out Coal and Double Down on Renewables
Trees Cut as Maple Syrup Farmers Lose Eminent Domain Battle Over Constitution Pipeline